Literature DB >> 10224120

Evidence that the co-chaperone p23 regulates ligand responsiveness of the dioxin (Aryl hydrocarbon) receptor.

A Kazlauskas1, L Poellinger, I Pongratz.   

Abstract

The dioxin (aryl hydrocarbon) receptor is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that induces expression of a number of genes encoding drug metabolizing enzymes. In the absence of ligand the dioxin receptor is present in the cytoplasmic compartment of the cell associated with the molecular chaperone hsp90, which has been implicated in regulating the correct folding of the ligand binding domain of the receptor. In this study we have examined a potential role of the hsp90-associated p23 protein in the activation process of the dioxin receptor to a DNA binding form. In an in vitro model we show that addition of ligand alone to the dioxin receptor fails to induce release of hsp90 from the dioxin receptor. In the presence of ligand, this release was, however, induced upon addition of purified preparations of Arnt. Interestingly, p23 was also found to be associated with the nonactivated form of the dioxin receptor. Following fractionation on sucrose gradients p23 was dissociated from the receptor-hsp90 complex generating a receptor form, which showed ligand-independent release of hsp90 by Arnt and, consequently, ligand-independent activation of the DNA binding activity of the dioxin receptor. Ligand dependence was reconstituted in the presence of molybdate, a transition metal ion known to stabilize the interaction between the molecular chaperone hsp90 and p23. Taken together these experiments suggest a role of p23 in modulating ligand responsiveness in the activation process of the dioxin receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10224120     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.19.13519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  83 in total

1.  The hsp90 chaperone complex regulates intracellular localization of the dioxin receptor.

Authors:  A Kazlauskas; S Sundström; L Poellinger; I Pongratz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced MUC5AC expression: aryl hydrocarbon receptor-independent/EGFR/ERK/p38-dependent SP1-based transcription.

Authors:  Yong C Lee; Karen L Oslund; Philip Thai; Sharlene Velichko; Tomoyuki Fujisawa; Trang Duong; Michael S Denison; Reen Wu
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 6.914

3.  Gene cloning and expression analysis of AhR and CYP4 from Pinctada martensii after exposed to pyrene.

Authors:  Junqiao Du; Chenghong Liao; Hailong Zhou; Xiaoping Diao; Yuhu Li; Pengfei Zheng; Fuqiang Wang
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Canonical and non-canonical aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling pathways.

Authors:  Eric J Wright; Karen Pereira De Castro; Aditya D Joshi; Cornelis J Elferink
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-01-18

5.  Loss of hepatic aryl hydrocarbon receptor protein in adrenalectomized rats does not involve altered levels of the receptor's cytoplasmic chaperones.

Authors:  Chunja Lee; Anne K Mullen Grey; David S Riddick
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.273

6.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-mediated reporter gene expression systems in transgenic tobacco plants.

Authors:  Susumu Kodama; Kumiko Okada; Hideyuki Inui; Hideo Ohkawa
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  The crystal structure of the AhRR-ARNT heterodimer reveals the structural basis of the repression of AhR-mediated transcription.

Authors:  Shunya Sakurai; Toshiyuki Shimizu; Umeharu Ohto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Newspapers and newspaper ink contain agonists for the ah receptor.

Authors:  Jessica E S Bohonowych; Bin Zhao; Alicia Timme-Laragy; Dawoon Jung; Richard T Di Giulio; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Hypoxia and Mucosal Inflammation.

Authors:  Sean P Colgan; Eric L Campbell; Douglas J Kominsky
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 23.472

10.  The Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor does not require the p23 co-chaperone for ligand binding and target gene expression in vivo.

Authors:  Colin Flaveny; Gary H Perdew; Charles A Miller
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.