Literature DB >> 28902862

Distinct genetic clades of enterovirus D68 detected in 2010, 2013, and 2015 in Osaka City, Japan.

Atsushi Kaida1, Nobuhiro Iritani1, Seiji P Yamamoto1, Daiki Kanbayashi1, Yuki Hirai1, Masao Togawa2, Kiyoko Amo2, Urara Kohdera3, Toshinori Nishigaki4, Masashi Shiomi5, Sadasaburo Asai6, Tsutomu Kageyama7, Hideyuki Kubo1.   

Abstract

The first upsurge of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), a causative agent of acute respiratory infections (ARIs), in Japan was reported in Osaka City in 2010. In this study, which began in 2010, we surveyed EV-D68 in children with ARIs and analyzed sequences of EV-D68 strains detected. Real-time PCR of 19 respiratory viruses or subtypes of viruses, including enterovirus, was performed on 2,215 specimens from ARI patients (<10 years of age) collected between November 2010 and December 2015 in Osaka City, Japan. EV-D68 was identified in 18 enterovirus-positive specimens (n = 4 in 2013, n = 1 in 2014, and n = 13 in 2015) by analysis of viral protein 1 (VP1) or VP4 sequences, followed by a BLAST search for similar sequences. All EV-D68 strains were detected between June and October (summer to autumn), except for one strain detected in 2014. A phylogenetic analysis of available VP1 sequences revealed that the Osaka strains detected in 2010, 2013, and 2015 belonged to distinct clusters (Clades C, A, and B [Subclade B3], respectively). Comparison of the 5' untranslated regions of these viruses showed that Osaka strains in Clades A, B (Subclade B3), and C commonly had deletions at nucleotide positions 681-703 corresponding to the prototype Fermon strain. Clades B and C had deletions from nucleotide positions 713-724. Since the EV-D68 epidemic in 2010, EV-D68 re-emerged in Osaka City, Japan, in 2013 and 2015. Results of this study indicate that distinct clades of EV-D68 contributed to re-emergences of this virus in 2010, 2013, and 2015 in this limited region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28902862      PMCID: PMC5597212          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus that belongs to the family Picornaviridae, genus Enterovirus, and species Enterovirus D [1]. EV-D68 was first isolated in the US in 1962 from four children with pneumonia and bronchitis [2]. EV-D68 was then rarely reported until the early 2000s. In fact, only 26 cases were reported in the US from 1975 to 2005 [3]. Around 2010, epidemics of EV-D68 coincident with acute respiratory infections (ARIs) were reported worldwide [4]. EV-D68 was also detected in patients with acute flaccid paralysis (AFP)/acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) in the US, Norway, and France from 2012 to 2014 [5-9]. The EV-D68 genome encodes a precursor polyprotein between the 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs). After proteolytic processing, the following mature proteins are synthesized: structural proteins (viral protein [VP] 4, VP2, VP3, and VP1) and non-structural proteins (2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D). The surface of the viral capsid is composed mainly of VP1, VP2, and VP3, and the nucleotide sequence of VP1 has been used for phylogenetic analyses because it corresponds with virus antigenicity [10]. Recently detected EV-D68 strains belong to four major genetic clades (A, B, C, and D), as determined by molecular analyses of the VP1 gene [11-14]. Clade B has three subclades (B1, B2, and B3) [11, 15, 16] The first reported EV-D68 upsurge in Japan occurred in Osaka City, the second largest city in Japan with 2.7 million residents, in 2010; a single genetic clade was responsible (Clade C) [17]. In this study, we surveyed EV-D68 in children with ARIs since that first epidemic in 2010 and molecularly analyzed the strains detected. This is the first report of longitudinal surveillance of EV-D68 in children with ARIs in a limited geographic area in Japan since the 2010 epidemic. Here, re-emergence of EV-D68 was observed in patients with ARIs mainly in 2013 and 2015, with distinct genetic clades responsible for epidemics in each of these years.

Materials and methods

Clinical specimens

From November 2010 to December 2015, 1,905 respiratory specimens were obtained by pediatricians from children (<10 years of age) suspected of having viral ARIs in a passive surveillance program (with influenza-diagnosed specimens were excluded) conducted in Osaka City, Japan [18]. In addition, 310 respiratory specimens were collected from hospitals and clinics from April to December 2015 for cooperative research. Surveillance in Osaka City was part of a national surveillance program for viral infectious diseases in Japan based on the Infectious Diseases Control Law. Specimens, collected as part of a passive surveillance, were residues after clinical use in hospitals and clinics. Specimens were anonymized before testing in our public health laboratory. Sample collection, detection of pathogens, and analysis of detected pathogens were approved by domestic law without additional permissions. Specifically, informed consent is considered unnecessary by domestic law and according to ethical guidelines for epidemiological research. However, sample collection for the cooperative research, which was not considered virus surveillance, required both informed consent and ethics committee review. Therefore, written consent was obtained from parents and guardians of the children whose specimens were included in the study. This part of the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan (no. 532).

EV-D68 identification

Viral nucleic acid was extracted using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany). Then, cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript III (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) or PrimeScript Reverse Transcriptase (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) with random hexamer primers. Multiplex real-time PCR was performed using a kit (QuantiTect Multiplex PCR; Qiagen Inc.) to detect 19 viruses or subtypes of viruses, including human metapneumovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (A, B), human parainfluenza virus types 1–4, human bocavirus, human coronavirus (229E, OC43, HKU1, NL63), influenza virus (A [FLUAV], A H1N1 2009 [FLUA (H1N1) 2009], B [FLUBV], C [FLUCV]), human adenovirus, human enterovirus (HEV), and human rhinovirus, as described previously [18]. For enterovirus-positive specimens, the VP1 or VP4 region was amplified by conventional reverse transcription-PCR. VP1 was amplified by PCR using primers 224 (5′-GCIATGYTIGGIACICAYRT-3′) and 222 (5′-CICCIGGIGGIAYRWACAT-3′), followed by a nested PCR using primers AN89 (5′-CCAGCACTGACAGCAGYNGARAYNGG-3′) and AN88 (5′-TACTGGACCACCTGGNGGNAYRWACAT-3′) [19]. VP4 was amplified using primers OL68-1 (5′-GGTAAYTTCCACCACCANCC-3′) and EVP4 (5′-CTACTTTGGGTGTCCGTGTT-3′) [20]. PCR products were subjected to direct sequencing, and EV-D68 was identified by phylogenetic analysis.

EV-D68 genome sequence determination

The complete or nearly complete genome sequences of EV-D68 strains from Osaka in 2013 and 2015 were determined as follows: cDNA was synthesized using primers (random hexamer or sequence-specific) and SuperScript III; then, EV-D68 genomes were amplified in nine fragments using the primers shown in S1 Table. PCR was performed using KOD-plus Neo DNA Polymerase (TOYOBO, Tokyo, Japan) with the following conditions: 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35–45 cycles at 98°C for 10 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 68°C between 30 s and 4 min according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen Inc.). End-specific nucleotide sequences were determined using the 5′ RACE system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 3′ RACE with primer TX30SXN [21]. Nucleotide sequences were determined using an ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Molecular analysis

Available nucleotide sequences were obtained from GenBank. The nucleotide sequences of the 14 EV-D68 strains identified in this study were deposited into the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database (accession nos. LC068709–LC068711, LC107890–LC107897, LC107899–LC107901). Complete or near-complete genome sequences of 58 strains of EV-D68 obtained worldwide were used for the phylogenetic analyses. In addition, sequences of VP1 (927 nt, corresponding to nucleotide positions 2,389–3,315 of the Fermon strain) from 110 strains were used to construct the phylogenetic tree. Sequences were aligned in MUSCLE, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA 7.0 [22]. Genetic clades were applied based on a previous report [11]. To analyze the 5′ UTR sequences of the EV-D68 strains, sequences at nucleotide positions 501–1000 were aligned in MEGA 7.0 and visualized using Genetyx ver. 13 (Genetyx Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Results

Re-emergences of EV-D68 in children with ARIs in 2013, 2014, and 2015

The monthly distribution of EV-D68 from 2010 to 2015 is presented in Fig 1. Our previously reported data on EV-D68 strains detected in patients with ARI between January and October 2010 [17] were also added to the figure. After the upsurge of EV-D68 in 2010, no EV-D68 was detected in 2011 or 2012. However, re-emergences of EV-D68 were observed in 2013, 2014, and 2015. In all, 18 EV-D68 strains were detected (n = 4, 2.8% in 2013; n = 1, 0.4% in 2014; and n = 13, 1.9% in 2015). To exclude the effects of different sample sizes collected each month, the rate of EV-D68 positivity per month was calculated: 6.5% (June), 13.9% (July), 15.4% (August), and 6.4% (September) in 2010; 12.5% (September) and 25% (October) in 2013; 6.3% (December) in 2014; 1.4% (July), 5.9% (August), 13.2% (September), and 6.1% (October) in 2015. EV-D68 was detected from June to October (summer to autumn) in 2010, 2013, and 2015, but not in 2014.
Fig 1

Distribution of EV-D68 in Osaka City, Japan, from January 2010 to December 2015.

The unbroken line represents the number of specimens collected per month. The shaded bar shows EV-D68-positive specimens from patients with ARIs. Our previous data from January to October 2010 are also shown.

Distribution of EV-D68 in Osaka City, Japan, from January 2010 to December 2015.

The unbroken line represents the number of specimens collected per month. The shaded bar shows EV-D68-positive specimens from patients with ARIs. Our previous data from January to October 2010 are also shown. The 18 EV-D68-positive patients (9 males, 9 females) (nos. 1–18 in Table 1) belonged to different age groups: 0–11 months (n = 6, 33.3%), 1 year (n = 4, 22.2%), 2 years (n = 1, 5.6%), 3 years (n = 3, 22.2%), 4 years (n = 2, 11.1%), 6 years (n = 1, 5.6%), and 9 years (n = 1, 5.6%). Patients <2 years of age accounted for 55.6% of all EV-D68-positive cases in the study. Almost all patients showed signs of lower respiratory tract infections and were diagnosed with the following: pneumonia (n = 6), asthmatic bronchitis (n = 5), asthma (n = 2), bronchial asthma (n = 2), bronchitis (n = 1), respiratory failure (n = 1), and pertussis or viral ARI (suspected) (n = 1). Of the 18 EV-D68-positive patients, 15 (83.3%) were positive for EV-D68 alone. In the remaining three patients, co-infections of EV-D68 with adenovirus or rhinovirus (Table 1) were identified. No associations between genetic clade and clinical signs were observed.
Table 1

Information on EV-D68-positive patients and EV-D68 detected in 2010–2015 in Osaka City, Japan.

No.NameSpecimensAgeGenderDiagnosisSampling DateCo-detectionCladeSequenced RegionNucleotides sequencedGenBank No.
1705-OsakaC-JPN-2013Tracheal aspirate0 y 4 mMViral bronchitis, respiratory failure2013/9/30RhinovirusAComplete genome1–7341LC068709
2726-OsakaC-JPN-2013Nasal mucus2 y 0 mMAsthmatic bronchitis2013/10/8AdenovirusAComplete genome1–7341LC068710
3727-OsakaC-JPN-2013Nasal mucus6 y 0 mFPneumonia2013/10/4ANearly complete genome48–7342LC068711
4752-OsakaC-JPN-2013Throat swab9 y 1 mMAsthmatic bronchitis2013/10/22ND*VP4NR**NR**
51082-OsakaC-JPN-2014Nasal mucus1 y 7 mMPneumonia2014/12/1ND*VP4NR**NR**
6594-OsakaC-JPN-2015Nasal mucus4 y 1 mMAsthma, bronchitis2015/8/15B (Subclade B3)Nearly complete genome1–7296LC107895
7639-OsakaC-JPN-2015Nasal mucus3 y 10 mMAsthma, bronchitis2015/8/28B (Subclade B3)Nearly complete genome1–7286LC107896
8676-OsakaC-JPN-2015Nasal mucus0 y 9 mMAsthmatic bronchitis2015/9/11ND*Partial VP1NR**NR**
9712-OsakaC-JPN-2015Nasal mucus1 y 6 mFPneumonia2015/9/20ND*Partial VP1NR**NR**
10744-OsakaC-JPN-2015Nasal mucus1 y 7 mFAsthmatic bronchitis2015/10/5B (Subclade B3)Complete VP1927LC107890
11759-OsakaC-JPN-2015Nasal mucus3 y 8 mFAsthmatic bronchitis2015/10/8B (Subclade B3)Complete VP1927LC107891
12A184-OsakaC-JPN-2015Throat swab0 y 2 mFPertussis or viral ARI (suspected)2015/7/27B (Subclade B3)Nearly complete genome1–7286LC107897
13A194-OsakaC-JPN-2015Throat swab3 y 11 mFPneumonia, athma2015/8/4B (Subclade B3)Complete VP1927LC107892
14A216-OsakaC-JPN-2015Throat swab4 y 11 mFBronchial asthma2015/8/18B (Subclade B3)Complete VP1927LC107893
15A244-OsakaC-JPN-2015Nasopharyngeal aspirate0 y 7 mFPneumonia2015/9/11AdenovirusB (Subclade B3)Nearly complete genome1–7298LC107899
16A250-OsakaC-JPN-2015Nasopharyngeal aspirate1 y 2 mFPneumonia, athma2015/9/17B (Subclade B3)Nearly complete genome1–7112LC107900
17A252-OsakaC-JPN-2015Nasopharyngeal aspirate0 y 10 mMBronchitis2015/9/18B (Subclade B3)Nearly complete genome1–7110LC107901
18A274-OsakaC-JPN-2015Throat swab0 y 10 mMBronchial asthma2015/10/19B (Subclade B3)Complete VP1927LC107894
19200-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus4 yMBronchitis2010/6/4CComplete VP1927AB601872
20290-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus0 y 7 mFAsthmatic bronchitis2010/6/26CComplete genome1–7332AB601882
21373-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus3 y 6 mMBronchitis2010/7/17CComplete VP1927AB601873
22378-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus1 y 6 mFPneumonia2010/7/16CComplete genome1–7331AB601883
23396-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus4 y 6 mFPneumonia2010/7/22CNearly complete genome1–6764AB601884
24402-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus5 y 0 mFAsthma, respiratory failure2010/7/23CComplete VP1927AB601874
25412-OsakaC-JPN-2010Sputum3 y 9 mMLower respiratory tract infection2010/7/23CComplete VP1927AB601875
26441-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus1 y 3 mFAsthmatic bronchitis2010/8/1CComplete VP1927AB601876
27445-OsakaC-JPN-2010Sputum4 y 1 mMAsthmatic bronchitis2010/8/1CComplete VP1927AB601877
28471-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus1 y 6 mMBronchial pneumonia2010/8/5CComplete VP1927AB601878
29515-OsakaC-JPN-2010Throat swab0 y 3 mMUpper respiratory tract infection2010/8/19CPartial VP1NR**NR**
30573-OsakaC-JPN-2010Throat swab3 y 5 mMAsthmatic bronchitis2010/9/1CComplete VP1927AB601879
31616-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus0 y 7 mMAsthmatic bronchitis2010/9/13AdenovirusCComplete VP1927AB601880
32618-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus1 y 5 mMPneumonia2010/9/11CComplete VP1927AB601881
33404-OsakaC-JPN-2010Nasal mucus1 y 8 mMFebrile convulsion2010/7/25CNearly complete genome1–6764AB601885
34692-OsakaC-JPN-2013Nasal mucus0 y 9 mMAcute flaccid paralysis, diarrhea2013/9/24Human parechovirus 1AComplete genome1–7341LC068708
35685-OsakaC-JPN-2015Throat swab2 y 2 mMUnknown fever2015/9/15B (Subclade B3)Complete VP1927LC107889
36A166-OsakaC-JPN-2015Throat swab1 y 10 mFRash2015/7/10Human coronavirus OC43ND*Partial VP1NR**NR**
37A241-OsakaC-JPN-2015Throat swab0 y 2 mFFever2015/9/7B (Subclade B3)Nearly complete genome1–7196LC107898

ND*: Not determined

NR**: Not registered

ARI: Acute respiratory infection

No. 1–18: EV-D68 positives with respiratory symptoms in this study.

No. 19–32: EV-D68 positives with respiratory symptoms in our previous study (15).

No. 33–37: EV-D68 positives without respiratory symptoms.

ND*: Not determined NR**: Not registered ARI: Acute respiratory infection No. 1–18: EV-D68 positives with respiratory symptoms in this study. No. 19–32: EV-D68 positives with respiratory symptoms in our previous study (15). No. 33–37: EV-D68 positives without respiratory symptoms.

Phylogenetic analysis of the VP1 gene

The phylogenetic analysis was performed using available EV-D68 sequences obtained worldwide and Osaka strains obtained in 2010, 2013, and 2015. One EV-D68 strain detected in 2014 could not be amplified. Osaka strains detected in 2010, 2013, and 2015 belonged to Clade C, Clade A, and Clade B (Subclade B3), respectively (Fig 2). Clade names were assigned according to an earlier report [11].
Fig 2

Phylogeny of complete VP1 gene sequences.

Complete VP1 gene sequences (927 nt, corresponding to nucleotide positions 2,389–3,315 of the Fermon prototype strain of EV-D68) were analyzed. The phylogenetic tree was constructed and evaluated with 1,000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates using MEGA 7.0 software. Based on the Akaike information criterion with correction for finite sample sizes, a general time reversible (GTR) plus gamma distributed with invariant sites (G+I) model was used. Numbers at nodes, which indicate bootstrap support values (>85%), are shown. Sequences in GenBank were also included in the analysis. Strain name, country of origin, and year of detection are shown for each strain. GenBank accession numbers are presented in parentheses. The scale bar shows the genetic distance.

Phylogeny of complete VP1 gene sequences.

Complete VP1 gene sequences (927 nt, corresponding to nucleotide positions 2,389–3,315 of the Fermon prototype strain of EV-D68) were analyzed. The phylogenetic tree was constructed and evaluated with 1,000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates using MEGA 7.0 software. Based on the Akaike information criterion with correction for finite sample sizes, a general time reversible (GTR) plus gamma distributed with invariant sites (G+I) model was used. Numbers at nodes, which indicate bootstrap support values (>85%), are shown. Sequences in GenBank were also included in the analysis. Strain name, country of origin, and year of detection are shown for each strain. GenBank accession numbers are presented in parentheses. The scale bar shows the genetic distance. Nucleotide and amino acid sequence similarities among Osaka strains were the following: 98.2–100% (nt) and 98.7–100% (aa) in 2010; 98.5–99.0% (nt) and 100% (aa) in 2013; 97.3–99.8% (nt) and 98.0–100% (aa) in 2015; 89.3–90.5% (nt) and 94.8–95.4% (aa) between stains obtained in 2010 and 2013; 89.8–91.3% (nt) and 94.4–96.1% (aa) between strains obtained in 2010 and 2015; and 86.8–87.8% (nt) and 94.1–95.1% (aa) between strains obtained in 2013 and 2015. Osaka strains detected in the same year showed high similarities both in nucleotide and amino acid sequences; however, lower similarities were observed between strains detected in different years. When VP1 nucleotide and amino acid sequences of Osaka strains detected in 2015 (Subclade B3) were compared with recently reported strains from United States, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Yamagata, Japan, shown in Fig 2, they were found to be highly similar (96.5–100% [nt]; 97.1–100% [aa]) (Table 2).
Table 2

VP1 amino acid and nucleotide sequence identities between subclade B3 strains from Osaka and worldwide.

CountryNo. strainsYear of detectionNucleotide identity (%)Amino acid identity (%)
United States5201696.5–99.497.7–99.7
Taiwan3201497.5–98.398.1–99.7
Hong Kong5201497.7–99.099.0–100
China142013–201597.2–99.897.1–100
Yamagata, Japan3201597.4–10098.4–100

Phylogenetic analysis using complete or near-complete genome sequences of EV-D68 strains

To analyze and compare the strains detected in this study with strains reported earlier from around the world, complete genome sequences (7,341 nt) of two strains (705-OsakaC.JPN-2013, 726-OsakaC.JPN-2013) and near-complete genome sequences (7,110–7,298 nt) from seven strains (727-OsakaC.JPN-2013, 594-OsakaC.JPN-2015, 639-OsakaC.JPN-2015, A184-OsakaC.JPN-2015, A244-OsakaC.JPN-2015, A250-OsakaC.JPN-2015, A252-OsakaC.JPN-2015) were determined. The phylogenetic analysis of EV-D68 strains from Osaka showed that these strains belonged to three distinct clades (A, B, and C). Specifically, Osaka strains detected in 2010, 2013, and 2015 clustered into Clades C, A, and B (Subclade B3), respectively (Fig 3). This genogrouping was similar to that based on the VP1 analysis (Fig 2).
Fig 3

Phylogenetic analysis of complete or near-complete genome sequences of EV-D68 strains.

Complete or near-complete genome sequences of EV-D68 were used to construct a maximum likelihood phylogram. The phylogenetic tree was constructed and evaluated with 1,000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates using MEGA 7.0 software. Based on the Akaike information criterion with correction for finite sample sizes, a GTR plus G+I model was used. Numbers at nodes, which indicate bootstrap support values (>95%), are given. Sequences in GenBank were also included in the analysis. Strain name, country of origin, and year of detection are shown for each strain. GenBank accession numbers are presented in parentheses. The scale bar shows the genetic distance.

Phylogenetic analysis of complete or near-complete genome sequences of EV-D68 strains.

Complete or near-complete genome sequences of EV-D68 were used to construct a maximum likelihood phylogram. The phylogenetic tree was constructed and evaluated with 1,000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates using MEGA 7.0 software. Based on the Akaike information criterion with correction for finite sample sizes, a GTR plus G+I model was used. Numbers at nodes, which indicate bootstrap support values (>95%), are given. Sequences in GenBank were also included in the analysis. Strain name, country of origin, and year of detection are shown for each strain. GenBank accession numbers are presented in parentheses. The scale bar shows the genetic distance.

Amino acid alignment of the partial VP1 region

To analyze VP1 in detail, amino acid sequences were aligned and examined for substitutions. BC and DE loops located on the surface of the VP1 protein play important roles in the antigenicity of HEV, and two specific amino acid substitutions (N642D, S647A) were observed in the BC loop in Clade B, and one amino acid deletion (N692) was observed in the DE loop in Clade A and Clade D. In addition, a two-amino-acid insertion (arginineleucine) was also observed, but only at the 859–860 aa position in Clade D strains (Fig 4). Specific amino acid differences between clades or subclades in the same clade were also observed in the BC and DE loops, with substitutions such as N642D (Clade B), A644T (Clade B, C, D), S647E (Clade A, C, D), S647A (Clade B), T650A (excluding CA/AFP/11-1763 strains, Subclade B1 and B3), K662R (excluding A184-Osaka strain, Clade B, Clade C), and G693S and M700T (Clade A). The amino acid positions correspond to those of the Fermon strain.
Fig 4

Comparison of VP1 region amino acid sequences between EV-D68 strains in distinct genetic clades.

An alignment of partial amino acid sequences of the EV-D68 strains was analyzed. Strains in Fig 3 were used in this analysis.

Comparison of VP1 region amino acid sequences between EV-D68 strains in distinct genetic clades.

An alignment of partial amino acid sequences of the EV-D68 strains was analyzed. Strains in Fig 3 were used in this analysis.

Partial deletion of the 5′ UTR

To analyze the 5′ UTR of the complete or near-complete genome strains, nucleotide positions 501–1,000, corresponding to those of the Fermon strain, were analyzed. All clades (A, B, C, D) of EV-D68 showed deletions at positions 681–703 nt compared to the Fermon strain. As for Clade A, one nucleotide at position 680 was also deleted. Additionally, nucleotides 713–724 were deleted from strains in Clades B and C, except for in strain CA/AFP/11-1767 in Clade B, which also showed one nucleotide deletion at position 680 (Fig 5).
Fig 5

Alignment of nucleotide sequences of the 5′ UTR of strains in the three major genetic clades of EV-D68.

Nucleotide sequences (nucleotide positions 501–1,000, corresponding to those of the Fermon strain) were aligned in MEGA 7.0. A partial sequence (nucleotide positions 671–740 of Fermon strain) is shown. Hyphens denote deleted nucleotides.

Alignment of nucleotide sequences of the 5′ UTR of strains in the three major genetic clades of EV-D68.

Nucleotide sequences (nucleotide positions 501–1,000, corresponding to those of the Fermon strain) were aligned in MEGA 7.0. A partial sequence (nucleotide positions 671–740 of Fermon strain) is shown. Hyphens denote deleted nucleotides.

Discussion

This report is the first to describe longitudinal surveillance of EV-D68 in children with ARIs since the first epidemic in Japan in 2010. Of 18 EV-D68-positive patients, 15 (83.3%) were positive for EV-D68 alone. Therefore, EV-D68 is believed to be a cause of ARI in at least 15 of these cases. The specimens collected in 2013 were fewer than those collected in 2010–2012 or 2014–2015 because of fewer specimens collected from clinics and not because of a decreasing number of patients with ARI. The rates of EV-D68 positivity per year were 3.8%, 2.8%, and 1.9% in 2010, 2013, and 2015, respectively. The highest rates of EV-D68 were observed in August (15.4%) in 2010, October (25%) in 2013, and September (13.2%) in 2015. Taken together, these results indicate that EV-D68 epidemics in 2010, 2013, and 2015 in Osaka City might have occurred on a similar scale. Re-emergences of EV-D68 in Osaka City occurred mainly from June to October (summer to autumn) in 2013 and 2015, similar to its first appearance in 2010 [17]. Other epidemiological data on EV-D68 in Japan, Yamagata Prefecture, showed an upsurge of EV-D68 between summer and autumn in 2005–2010 [12]. Based on the available data, summer through autumn is believed to be the EV-D68 season in Japan. Multi-year studies on EV-D68 suggest that the EV-D68 epidemic season differs by country, with peak seasons of August—January in China [23], July—December in Australia [24], October—December in Germany [25], and July—October in the Netherlands [26], and variable seasons in Thailand and Hong Kong [15, 27]. Data from a multi-year study conducted worldwide are needed to precisely define EV-D68 seasonality. The phylogenetic analysis of complete or nearly complete genomes and VP1 sequences revealed that Osaka strains detected in 2010, 2013, and 2015 belonged to three genetic clades. Earlier reports describing receptor binding activity of EV-D68 strains in all genetic clades showed that distinct genetic clades have different antigenicities [28]. Therefore, differences in the prevalent genetic clade of EV-D68 each year in Osaka City might have contributed to its re-emergence in this limited geographic area. There were high similarities in VP1 nucleotide and amino acid sequences of Osaka strains detected in 2010, 2013, and 2015. However, lower similarities were observed for strains detected in 2010 vs. 2013, 2013 vs. 2015, and 2010 vs. 2015. This low similarity might be associated with differences in EV-D68 antigenicity. Lower herd immunity against strains in specific genetic clades of EV-D68 might have facilitated the rapid spread of a clade of EV-D68 that was not reported to be prevalent in the limited geographic area. Intriguingly, co-circulation of all three clades of EV-D68 was observed in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan, in the 2010 epidemic [12]. Based on these results, EV-D68 dynamics might differ in the same period in different parts of the country. One might infer that herd immunity against different clades of EV-D68 is associated with their prevalences in a limited geographic area. Certain amino acid changes and deletions in the BC and DE loops of the VP1 protein were observed between the clades of EV-D68. Moreover, characteristic amino acid substitutions were observed in a comparison of strains in subclades of the same clade. Considering the effects of the BC and DE loops on the surface of the VP1 protein, EV-D68 strains belonging to different subclades of the same clade might have different antigenicities. A partial deletion in the 5′ UTR was first reported based on our previous work [17]. Some characteristic partial deletions, relative to the prototype Fermon strain, were observed in the 5′ UTRs of EV-D68 strains in three clades. However, we did not analyze functional differences or the physiological importance of the deletion on EV-D68. To date, there has been no published report on the function of the EV-D68 5′ UTR. The 5′ UTR of an enterovirus contains an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) that is associated with translational efficiency and virulence [29-31]. Deletions in EV-D68 strains appeared to be in the region between the IRES and the open reading frame. Analysis of this deletion may yield important information about EV-D68. The 5′ UTR of EV-D68 strain CA/AFP/11-1767 in clade B showed a deletion similar to that of strains in Clade A. Du et al. analyzed 2014 North American EV-D68 outbreak using VP1, which revealed that CA/AFP/11-1767 strain was phylogenetically distant from other subclade B1 strains [32]. Their findings might partially explain one amino acid substitution (T650) in the BC loop of VP1 in strain CA/AFP/11-1767. However, the reason for the Clade A-like nucleotide deletion in the 5′UTR of strain CA/AFP/11-1767 remains unknown. Tan et al. reported intersubclade recombination events in the VP2 region between EV-D68 strains in clades B1 and B2 [33]. However, no intersubclade recombination was observed in EV-D68 strains from Osaka City in 2015 (data not shown). During the study period, four EV-D68-positive patients without signs of ARI were also found. These patients showed the following: AFP (n = 1 in 2013), fever (n = 1 in 2015), unknown fever (n = 1 in 2015), and rash (n = 1 in 2015) from respiratory specimens (Table 1). Although EV-D68 was detected in specimens from several individuals without ARI symptoms, whether EV-D68 was directly associated with specific clinical signs remains uncertain. EV-D68 in cases of AFM were reported in the US from 2012 to 2014. All of these strains belonged to Subclade B1 [5]. In addition, EV-D68 in cases of AFP/AFM were reported in Japan in 2015 [34, 35]. However, no EV-D68-positive AFP/AFM cases were observed in Osaka City in 2015. Only one Clade A strain in 2013 was detected from a case of AFP (692-OsakaC-JPN-2013). A few reports describing EV-D68 from patients with AFP/AFM were published in 2010 and 2013 in Japan, but genetic clades of the infecting strains were not determined [34]. Two AFM cases in France and Norway were associated with Subclade B2 EV-D68 infection [6, 9], as were two neurological cases in Kenya with Subclade A1 [36] described in an earlier report [33]. Considering previous reports of neurological conditions associated with the detection of strains in various clades of EV-D68, only Subclade B1 strain was found predominant in AFM cases. It is not a major cause of AFM. Overall, results of the analysis of complete or near-complete genome sequences suggest that the presence of strains in distinct lineages of EV-D68 in 2010, 2013, and 2015 might have contributed to the re-emergence of EV-D68 in this limited region because of lack of herd immunity. To analyze EV-D68 further, near-complete genome sequences of earlier reported strains from cases of ARI, AFM, encephalitis, central nervous system disorders, and other diseases must be determined. Recently, a novel genetic lineage of Subclade B3 was identified that now includes 2015 Osaka strains. Based on our phylogenetic analysis of VP1 (Fig 2), there are some strains (2013-0720-6-CHN, 2011-21186-CHN, CA/AFP/v12T00346-USA-2013, CU171-THA-2011, CU134-THA-2011) that do not clearly cluster in the currently recognized genetic subgroups in Clade B. Therefore, novel genetic subclades may be identified in the future. To date, it is uncertain whether specific clades of EV-D68 are associated with specific clinical signs. Accumulating epidemiological information and analyzing sequences of EV-D68 strains are important to understanding the recent upsurge in cases of EV-D68 infection and might suggest associations between specific genetic clades and clinical signs.

Nine primer pairs used to amplify the EV-D68 genomes.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  32 in total

1.  Phylogenetic analysis of the complete genome of 18 Norwalk-like viruses.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Katayama; Haruko Shirato-Horikoshi; Shigeyuki Kojima; Tsutomu Kageyama; Tomoichiro Oka; Fuminori Hoshino; Shuetsu Fukushi; Michiyo Shinohara; Kazue Uchida; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Takashi Gojobori; Naokazu Takeda
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.616

2.  A novel outbreak enterovirus D68 strain associated with acute flaccid myelitis cases in the USA (2012-14): a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alexander L Greninger; Samia N Naccache; Kevin Messacar; Anna Clayton; Guixia Yu; Sneha Somasekar; Scot Federman; Doug Stryke; Christopher Anderson; Shigeo Yagi; Sharon Messenger; Debra Wadford; Dongxiang Xia; James P Watt; Keith Van Haren; Samuel R Dominguez; Carol Glaser; Grace Aldrovandi; Charles Y Chiu
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Human rhinovirus 87 identified as human enterovirus 68 by VP4-based molecular diagnosis.

Authors:  Hiroaki Ishiko; Rika Miura; Yasushi Shimada; Akio Hayashi; Haruhiko Nakajima; Shudo Yamazaki; Naokazu Takeda
Journal:  Intervirology       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  Mutation of a single conserved nucleotide between the cloverleaf and internal ribosome entry site attenuates poliovirus neurovirulence.

Authors:  Nidia De Jesus; David Franco; Aniko Paul; Eckard Wimmer; Jeronimo Cello
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Associations between co-detected respiratory viruses in children with acute respiratory infections.

Authors:  Atsushi Kaida; Hideyuki Kubo; Koh-ichi Takakura; Jun-ichiro Sekiguchi; Seiji P Yamamoto; Urara Kohdera; Masao Togawa; Kiyoko Amo; Masashi Shiomi; Minori Ohyama; Kaoru Goto; Atsushi Hase; Tsutomu Kageyama; Nobuhiro Iritani
Journal:  Jpn J Infect Dis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.362

6.  MRI findings in children with acute flaccid paralysis and cranial nerve dysfunction occurring during the 2014 enterovirus D68 outbreak.

Authors:  J A Maloney; D M Mirsky; K Messacar; S R Dominguez; T Schreiner; N V Stence
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Enterovirus D68 disease and molecular epidemiology in Australia.

Authors:  Avram Levy; Jason Roberts; Jurissa Lang; Simone Tempone; Alison Kesson; Alfred Dofai; Andrew J Daley; Bruce Thorley; David J Speers
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.168

8.  Worldwide emergence of multiple clades of enterovirus 68.

Authors:  Rafal Tokarz; Cadhla Firth; Shabir A Madhi; Stephen R C Howie; Winfred Wu; Amadou Alpha Sall; Saddef Haq; Thomas Briese; W Ian Lipkin
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.891

9.  Antigenic and receptor binding properties of enterovirus 68.

Authors:  Tadatsugu Imamura; Michiko Okamoto; Shin-ichi Nakakita; Akira Suzuki; Mariko Saito; Raita Tamaki; Socorro Lupisan; Chandra Nath Roy; Hiroaki Hiramatsu; Kan-etsu Sugawara; Katsumi Mizuta; Yoko Matsuzaki; Yasuo Suzuki; Hitoshi Oshitani
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Genetic divergence of enterovirus D68 in China and the United States.

Authors:  Zichun Xiang; Zhengde Xie; Lulu Liu; Lili Ren; Yan Xiao; Gláucia Paranhos-Baccalà; Jianwei Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  10 in total

1.  Development of Novel PCR Assays for Improved Detection of Enterovirus D68.

Authors:  Tatsuki Ikuse; Yuta Aizawa; Hayato Takihara; Shujiro Okuda; Kanako Watanabe; Akihiko Saitoh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Genomic Analyses of Acute Flaccid Myelitis Cases among a Cluster in Arizona Provide Further Evidence of Enterovirus D68 Role.

Authors:  Jolene R Bowers; Michael Valentine; Veronica Harrison; Viacheslav Y Fofanov; John Gillece; Josie Delisle; Bethany Patton; James Schupp; Krystal Sheridan; Darrin Lemmer; Scott Ostdiek; Harlori K Bains; Jennifer Heim; Tammy Sylvester; Siru Prasai; Melissa Kretschmer; Nicole Fowle; Kenneth Komatsu; Shane Brady; Susan Robinson; Kathryn Fitzpatrick; Gholamabbas Amin Ostovar; Eric Alsop; Elizabeth Hutchins; Kendall Jensen; Paul Keim; David M Engelthaler
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 7.867

3.  Association of Enterovirus D68 with Acute Flaccid Myelitis, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2009-2018.

Authors:  Priyanka Uprety; Darcy Curtis; Michael Elkan; Jeffrey Fink; Ramakrishnan Rajagopalan; Chunyu Zhao; Kyle Bittinger; Stephanie Mitchell; Erlinda R Ulloa; Sarah Hopkins; Erin H Graf
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Molecular epidemiological study of enterovirus D68 in hospitalised children in Hong Kong in 2014-2015 and their complete coding sequences.

Authors:  Haichao Wang; Kinpong Tao; Cheuk Yin Leung; Kam Lun Hon; C M Apple Yeung; Zigui Chen; K S Paul Chan; Ting-Fan Leung; W Y Renee Chan
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2019-07-01

5.  Molecular and Clinical Comparison of Enterovirus D68 Outbreaks among Hospitalized Children, Ohio, USA, 2014 and 2018.

Authors:  Huanyu Wang; Alejandro Diaz; Katherine Moyer; Maria Mele-Casas; Maria Fatima Ara-Montojo; Isabel Torrus; Karen McCoy; Asuncion Mejias; Amy L Leber
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  Case report: painful exanthems caused by enterovirus D68 in an adolescent.

Authors:  Tu-Hsuan Chang; Tzu-I Yang; Wei-Yun Hsu; Li-Min Huang; Luan-Yin Chang; Chun-Yi Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Epidemiology and Sequence-Based Evolutionary Analysis of Circulating Non-Polio Enteroviruses.

Authors:  David M Brown; Yun Zhang; Richard H Scheuermann
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-11-25

8.  Global prevalence and case fatality rate of Enterovirus D68 infections, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amary Fall; Sebastien Kenmoe; Jean Thierry Ebogo-Belobo; Donatien Serge Mbaga; Arnol Bowo-Ngandji; Joseph Rodrigue Foe-Essomba; Serges Tchatchouang; Marie Amougou Atsama; Jacqueline Félicité Yéngué; Raoul Kenfack-Momo; Alfloditte Flore Feudjio; Alex Durand Nka; Chris Andre Mbongue Mikangue; Jean Bosco Taya-Fokou; Jeannette Nina Magoudjou-Pekam; Efietngab Atembeh Noura; Cromwel Zemnou-Tepap; Dowbiss Meta-Djomsi; Martin Maïdadi-Foudi; Ginette Irma Kame-Ngasse; Inès Nyebe; Larissa Gertrude Djukouo; Landry Kengne Gounmadje; Dimitri Tchami Ngongang; Martin Gael Oyono; Cynthia Paola Demeni Emoh; Hervé Raoul Tazokong; Gadji Mahamat; Cyprien Kengne-Ndé; Serge Alain Sadeuh-Mba; Ndongo Dia; Giuseppina La Rosa; Lucy Ndip; Richard Njouom
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-02-08

9.  Enterovirus D68 epidemic, UK, 2018, was caused by subclades B3 and D1, predominantly in children and adults, respectively, with both subclades exhibiting extensive genetic diversity.

Authors:  Hannah C Howson-Wells; Theocharis Tsoleridis; Izzah Zainuddin; Alexander W Tarr; William L Irving; Jonathan K Ball; Louise Berry; Gemma Clark; C Patrick McClure
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2022-05

Review 10.  Enterovirus D68 - The New Polio?

Authors:  Hayley Cassidy; Randy Poelman; Marjolein Knoester; Coretta C Van Leer-Buter; Hubert G M Niesters
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.