| Literature DB >> 27278628 |
Zichun Xiang1,2, Zhengde Xie3, Lulu Liu1, Lili Ren1,2, Yan Xiao1, Gláucia Paranhos-Baccalà4, Jianwei Wang1,2.
Abstract
The largest outbreak of human enterovirus 68 (EV-D68) infections associated with severe respiratory illness and neurological complications emerged from the United States in 2014. China reported the circulation of EV-D68 since 2006, but these cases were sporadic and did not display neurological symptoms. Yet viral determinants responsible for the difference in prevalence between China and the U.S. were not clear. We analyzed the genome of 64 reported Chinese EV-D68 strains and found that genogroup replacement has occurred in China since 2006. The six coding mutations (M291T, V341A, T860N, D927N, S1108G and R2005K) associated with neurovirulence reported in American strains were not found in Chinese strains. Moreover, 2014 Chinese strains had a unique R220A mutation in the puff region of VP2 while R220E mutation occurred in other strains. Like other enteroviruses, the loop sequences of the domain X and Y in the 3'-UTR of the Chinese strains are complementary. However, the X loop sequences of the 2014 American strains were not complementary but identical to Y loop sequences. These results indicate that different EV-D68 strains circulated in China and America and the mutations might be responsible for different prevalence. Our findings also provide new evidence for the sequence diversity of EV-D68.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27278628 PMCID: PMC4899779 DOI: 10.1038/srep27800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Temporal distribution and phylogenetic analysis of EV-D68 infections in the People’s Republic of China, August 2006-December 2014.
Genogroup A is indicated in blue and Genogroup B is indicated in red. (A) Monthly distribution of EV-D68 detected in China. Numbers of EV-D68 cases in each month during the study period are shown on the right-side y-axis. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of EV-D68 according to partial viral protein 1 (VP1) (338-bp fragments, which correspond to the locations of nt 2518–2855 of the EV-D68 prototype strain (GenBank accession no. AY426531)) nucleotide sequences. The Maximum Likelihood tree was generated with 500 bootstrap replicates using the Tamura-Nei model. The strains identified in this study are indicated by black solid circles. Chinese strains which had T207 and R220A substitutions are shaded. (C–E) Relative genetic diversity dynamics of Chinese EV-D68 strains using sequences of 64 EV-D68 partial VP1 genes obtained from 2006 to 2014. Bayesian skyline plot estimates depicting the past genetic diversity dynamics of EV-D68 were generated using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis implemented in Beast 1.8.1. The medians (g) are represented by the black lines and 95% high posterior densities are shown in the colored regions. (C) Genetic diversity of Genogroup A was determined using the HKY+G substitution model. (D) Genetic diversity of Genogroup B was determined using the TrN+G substitution model. (E) The total genetic diversity was determined using the TrN+G substitution model.
Figure 2Coding polymorphisms associated with EV-D68 (Greninger clade B17).
Multiple sequence alignment of the six coding polymorphisms using BioEdit software version 3.3.19.0. Conserved residues are represented by dots and Chinese strains are shaded.
Figure 3Multiple sequence alignment of puff region in VP2.
Multiple sequence alignment of puff region in VP2 was performed by using BioEdit software version 3.3.19.0. Conserved residues are represented by dots and Chinese strains are shaded.
Figure 4Sequence alignment and structure of the EV-D68 3′-UTR.
(A) Multiple sequence alignment of the EV-D68 3′-UTR was performed using BioEdit software version 3.3.19.0. The X, Y, and kissing-like (K) domains are indicated in the figure. (B) Secondary structure of the individual domains X and Y of the EV-D68 3′-UTR. The kissing-like pseudoknot interaction is designated as connecting lines between nucleotides in loops X and Y.