Literature DB >> 28902371

No Difference in Functional Outcomes after Total Knee Arthroplasty with or without Pinless Navigation.

Meng Zhu1, Jerry Yongqiang Chen1, Hwei Chi Chong2, Hee Nee Pang1, Darren Keng Jin Tay1, Shi-Lu Chia1, Ngai Nung Lo1, Seng Jin Yeo1.   

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the functional outcomes of pinless navigation (BrainLAB VectorVision Knee 2.5 navigation system; Munich, Germany) as an intraoperative alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A prospective, 24-month follow-up study of 100 patients who were scheduled and randomized into two groups, the pinless navigation and conventional surgery, was conducted. All TKAs were performed with the surgical aim of achieving neutral coronal alignment with the 180-degree mechanical axis. The outcomes measured in this study were Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and range of motion (ROM). At 24-month postoperatively, four and two patients were lost to follow-up from the pinless navigation group and conventional group, respectively. There were no significant differences in absolute scores of the OKS, KSS, and ROM, as well as changes from preoperative baseline, between pinless navigation and conventional groups at both 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Pinless navigation results in comparable functional outcomes as conventional TKA at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28902371     DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  5 in total

1.  Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Prashant Pawar; Lokesh Naik; Dipit Sahu; Vaibhav Bagaria
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-04-12

2.  Patient expectations and satisfaction in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective two-year outcome study.

Authors:  Christopher L Blum; Eric Lepkowsky; Adil Hussein; Edgar A Wakelin; Christopher Plaskos; Jan A Koenig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Clinical outcomes associated with robotic and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning-augmented systematic review.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Joe Clair; Nazanin Esmaili; Arshad Barmare; Siva Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-25

4.  Pre-operative prediction of soft tissue balancing in knee arthoplasty part 1: Effect of surgical parameters during level walking.

Authors:  Marco Viceconti; Daniele Ascani; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  A novel augmented reality-based surgical guidance system for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sandro F Fucentese; Peter P Koch
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.