Literature DB >> 28902106

Fine-tuning the Predictive Model for Proximal Junctional Failure in Surgically Treated Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity.

Mitsuru Yagi1,2,3, Nobuyuki Fujita1,3, Eijiro Okada1,3, Osahiko Tsuji1,3, Narihito Nagoshi1,3, Takashi Asazuma2, Ken Ishii3,4, Masaya Nakamura1,3, Morio Matsumoto1,3, Kota Watanabe1,3.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To validate and improve the predictive model for proximal junctional failure (PJF) with or without the bone mineral density (BMD) score. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PJF is a serious complication of surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). A predictive model for PJF was recently reported that has good accuracy, but does not include BMD, a known PJF risk factor, as a variable.
METHODS: We included 145 surgically treated ASD patients who were older than 50 at the time of surgery and had been followed up for at least 2 years. Variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), fusion level, upper and lower instrumented vertebral (UIV and LIV) level, primary or revision surgery, pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), Schwab-SRS type, and BMD. PJF was defined as a ≥ 20° increase from baseline (immediately postoperative) of the proximal junctional angle with concomitant deterioration of at least 1 SRS-Schwab sagittal modifier grade, or any proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision. Decision-making trees were constructed using the C5.0 algorithm with 10 different bootstrapped models, and validated by a 7:3 data split for training and testing; 112 patients were categorized as training and 33 as testing samples.
RESULTS: PJF incidence was 20% in the training samples. Univariate analyses showed that BMD, BMI, pelvic tilt (PT), UIV level, and LIV level were PJF risk factors. Our predictive model was 100% accurate in the testing samples with an AUC of 1.0, indicating excellent fit. The best predictors were (strongest to weakest): PT, BMD, LIV level (pelvis), UIV level (lower thoracic), PSO, global alignment, BMI, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, and age.
CONCLUSION: A successful model was developed for predicting PJF that included BMD. Our model could inform physicians about patients with a high risk of developing PJF in the perioperative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28902106     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Proximal junctional fractures after long-segment instrumented fusion: comparisons between upper instrumented vertebrae and upper instrumented vertebrae + 1.

Authors:  Jen-Chung Liao; Wen-Jer Chen; Shiny Chih-Hsuan Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 2.677

2.  Factors influencing upper-most instrumented vertebrae selection in adult spinal deformity patients: qualitative case-based survey of deformity surgeons.

Authors:  Sohrab Virk; Uwe Platz; Shay Bess; Douglas Burton; Peter Passias; Munish Gupta; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Han Jo Kim; Justin S Smith; Robert Eastlack; Khaled Kebaish; Gregory M Mundis; Pierce Nunley; Christopher Shaffrey; Jeffrey Gum; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-03

Review 3.  A narrative review of machine learning as promising revolution in clinical practice of scoliosis.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Xiao Zhai; Kaiqiang Sun; Haojue Wang; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

4.  A predictive scoring system for proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior internal fixation in elderly patients with chronic osteoporotic vertebral fracture: A single-center diagnostic study.

Authors:  Xing Du; Guanyin Jiang; Yong Zhu; Wei Luo; Yunsheng Ou
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 5.  State-of-the-art reviews predictive modeling in adult spinal deformity: applications of advanced analytics.

Authors:  Rushikesh S Joshi; Darryl Lau; Justin K Scheer; Miquel Serra-Burriel; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Shay Bess; Justin S Smith; Ferran Pellise; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-05-18

6.  Artificial Intelligence for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Rushikesh S Joshi; Alexander F Haddad; Darryl Lau; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-12-31

7.  Alignment Targets, Curve Proportion and Mechanical Loading: Preliminary Analysis of an Ideal Shape Toward Reducing Proximal Junctional Kyphosis.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Katsuura; Renaud Lafage; Han Jo Kim; Justin S Smith; Breton Line; Christopher Shaffrey; Douglas C Burton; Christopher P Ames; Gregory M Mundis; Richard Hostin; Shay Bess; Eric O Klineberg; Peter G Passias; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.