BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The poor prognosis of acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia (AMKL) means there is a need to develop novel therapeutic methods to treat this condition. It was recently shown that inducing megakaryoblasts to undergo terminal differentiation is effective as a treatment for AMKL. This encouraged us to identify a compound that induces megakaryocyte differentiation, which could then act as a potent anti-leukaemia agent. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of tetrandrine on the expression of CD41 and cell morphology were investigated in AMKL cells. We used CRISPR/Cas9 knockout system to knock out ATG7 and verify the role of autophagy in tetrandrine-induced megakaryocyte differentiation. shNotch1 and CA-Akt were transfected into K562 cells to examine the downstream pathways of ROS signalling and the mechanistic basis of the tetrandrine-induced megakaryocyte differentiation. The anti-leukaemia effects of tetrandrine were analysed both in vitro and in vivo. KEY RESULTS: A low dose of tetrandrine induced cell cycle arrest and megakaryocyte differentiation in AMKL cells via activation of autophagy. Molecularly, we demonstrated that this effect is mediated by activation of Notch1 and Akt and subsequent accumulation of ROS. In contrast, in normal mouse fetal liver cells, although tetrandrine induced autophagy, it did not affect cell proliferation or promote megakaryocyte differentiation, suggesting a specific effect of tetrandrine in malignant megakaryoblasts. Finally, tetrandrine also showed in vivo efficacy in an AMKL xenograft mouse model. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Modulating autophagy-mediated differentiation may be a novel strategy for treating AMKL, and tetrandrine has the potential to be developed as a differentiation-inducing agent for AMKL chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The poor prognosis of acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia (AMKL) means there is a need to develop novel therapeutic methods to treat this condition. It was recently shown that inducing megakaryoblasts to undergo terminal differentiation is effective as a treatment for AMKL. This encouraged us to identify a compound that induces megakaryocyte differentiation, which could then act as a potent anti-leukaemia agent. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of tetrandrine on the expression of CD41 and cell morphology were investigated in AMKL cells. We used CRISPR/Cas9 knockout system to knock out ATG7 and verify the role of autophagy in tetrandrine-induced megakaryocyte differentiation. shNotch1 and CA-Akt were transfected into K562 cells to examine the downstream pathways of ROS signalling and the mechanistic basis of the tetrandrine-induced megakaryocyte differentiation. The anti-leukaemia effects of tetrandrine were analysed both in vitro and in vivo. KEY RESULTS: A low dose of tetrandrine induced cell cycle arrest and megakaryocyte differentiation in AMKL cells via activation of autophagy. Molecularly, we demonstrated that this effect is mediated by activation of Notch1 and Akt and subsequent accumulation of ROS. In contrast, in normal mouse fetal liver cells, although tetrandrine induced autophagy, it did not affect cell proliferation or promote megakaryocyte differentiation, suggesting a specific effect of tetrandrine in malignant megakaryoblasts. Finally, tetrandrine also showed in vivo efficacy in an AMKL xenograft mouse model. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Modulating autophagy-mediated differentiation may be a novel strategy for treating AMKL, and tetrandrine has the potential to be developed as a differentiation-inducing agent for AMKL chemotherapy.
Authors: Dennis J Goussetis; Jessica K Altman; Heather Glaser; Jennifer L McNeer; Martin S Tallman; Leonidas C Platanias Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: U H Athale; B I Razzouk; S C Raimondi; X Tong; F G Behm; D R Head; D K Srivastava; J E Rubnitz; L Bowman; C H Pui; R C Ribeiro Journal: Blood Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Thomas Mercher; Glen D Raffel; Sandra A Moore; Melanie G Cornejo; Dominique Baudry-Bluteau; Nicolas Cagnard; Jonathan L Jesneck; Yana Pikman; Dana Cullen; Ifor R Williams; Koichi Akashi; Hirokazu Shigematsu; Jean-Pierre Bourquin; Marco Giovannini; William Vainchenker; Ross L Levine; Benjamin H Lee; Olivier A Bernard; D Gary Gilliland Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Tanja A Gruber; Amanda Larson Gedman; Jinghui Zhang; Cary S Koss; Suresh Marada; Huy Q Ta; Shann-Ching Chen; Xiaoping Su; Stacey K Ogden; Jinjun Dang; Gang Wu; Vedant Gupta; Anna K Andersson; Stanley Pounds; Lei Shi; John Easton; Michael I Barbato; Heather L Mulder; Jayanthi Manne; Jianmin Wang; Michael Rusch; Swati Ranade; Ramapriya Ganti; Matthew Parker; Jing Ma; Ina Radtke; Li Ding; Giovanni Cazzaniga; Andrea Biondi; Steven M Kornblau; Farhad Ravandi; Hagop Kantarjian; Stephen D Nimer; Konstanze Döhner; Hartmut Döhner; Timothy J Ley; Paola Ballerini; Sheila Shurtleff; Daisuke Tomizawa; Souichi Adachi; Yasuhide Hayashi; Akio Tawa; Lee-Yung Shih; Der-Cherng Liang; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Ching-Hon Pui; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; James R Downing Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Yoshihiro Ojima; Mark Thompson Duncan; Retno Wahyu Nurhayati; Masahito Taya; William Martin Miller Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 3.905
Authors: Y Kamitsuji; J Kuroda; S Kimura; S Toyokuni; K Watanabe; E Ashihara; H Tanaka; Y Yui; M Watanabe; H Matsubara; Y Mizushima; Y Hiraumi; E Kawata; T Yoshikawa; T Maekawa; T Nakahata; S Adachi Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2008-07-11 Impact factor: 15.828