Literature DB >> 28901055

Phantom-based image quality test methods for photoacoustic imaging systems.

William C Vogt1, Congxian Jia1, Keith A Wear1, Brian S Garra1, T Joshua Pfefer1.   

Abstract

As photoacoustic imaging (PAI) technologies advance and applications arise, there is increasing need for standardized approaches to provide objective, quantitative performance assessment at various stages of the product development and clinical translation process. We have developed a set of performance test methods for PAI systems based on breast-mimicking tissue phantoms containing embedded inclusions. Performance standards for mature imaging modalities [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound] were used to guide selection of critical PAI image quality characteristics and experimental methods. Specifically, the tests were designed to address axial, lateral, and elevational spatial resolution, signal uniformity, penetration depth, sensitivity, spatial measurement accuracy, and PAI-ultrasound coregistration. As an initial demonstration of the utility of these test methods, we characterized the performance of a modular, bimodal PAI-ultrasound system using four clinical ultrasound transducers with varying design specifications. Results helped to inform optimization of acquisition and data processing procedures while providing quantitative elucidation of transducer-dependent differences in image quality. Comparison of solid, tissue-mimicking polymer phantoms with those based on Intralipid indicated the superiority of the former approach in simulating real-world conditions for PAI. This work provides a critical foundation for the establishment of well-validated test methods that will facilitate the maturation of PAI as a medical imaging technology. (2017) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  image quality; mammography; standards; tissue phantoms; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28901055     DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.9.095002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  12 in total

Review 1.  Photoacoustic-guided surgery from head to toe [Invited].

Authors:  Alycen Wiacek; Muyinatu A Lediju Bell
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Impact of skin tone on photoacoustic oximetry and tools to minimize bias.

Authors:  Yash Mantri; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Transfontanelle photoacoustic imaging: ultrasound transducer selection analysis.

Authors:  Rayyan Manwar; Md Tarikul Islam; Seyed Mohsen Ranjbaran; Kamran Avanaki
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Tissue-mimicking phantoms for performance evaluation of photoacoustic microscopy systems.

Authors:  Hsun-Chia Hsu; Keith A Wear; T Joshua Pfefer; William C Vogt
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Biomimetic phantom with anatomical accuracy for evaluating brain volumetric measurements with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mehran Azimbagirad; Felipe Wilker Grillo; Yaser Hadadian; Antonio Adilton Oliveira Carneiro; Luiz Otavio Murta
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-01-29

6.  Evaluation of Fluence Correction Algorithms in Multispectral Photoacoustic Imaging.

Authors:  Xuewen Zhou; Nima Akhlaghi; Keith A Wear; Brian S Garra; T Joshua Pfefer; William C Vogt
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2020-04-18

7.  Multidomain computational modeling of photoacoustic imaging: verification, validation, and image quality prediction.

Authors:  Nima Akhlaghi; T Joshua Pfefer; Keith A Wear; Brian S Garra; William C Vogt
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Suite of 3D test objects for performance assessment of hybrid photoacoustic-ultrasound breast imaging systems.

Authors:  Maura Dantuma; Saskia C Kruitwagen; Marlies J Weggemans; Tim J P M Op't Root; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.758

9.  Performance test methods for near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Udayakumar Kanniyappan; Bohan Wang; Charles Yang; Pejhman Ghassemi; Maritoni Litorja; Nitin Suresh; Quanzeng Wang; Yu Chen; T Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Improved Depth-of-Field Photoacoustic Microscopy with a Multifocal Point Transducer for Biomedical Imaging.

Authors:  Thanh Phuoc Nguyen; Van Tu Nguyen; Sudip Mondal; Van Hiep Pham; Dinh Dat Vu; Byung-Gak Kim; Junghwan Oh
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.