Literature DB >> 28900873

Numerical analysis of intracochlear mechanical auditory stimulation using piezoelectric bending actuators.

Daniel Schurzig1, Sebastian Schwarzendahl2, Jörg Wallaschek2, Wouter J van Drunen3, Thomas S Rau3, Thomas Lenarz3, Omid Majdani3.   

Abstract

Cochlear implantation can restore a certain degree of auditory impression of patients suffering from profound hearing loss or deafness. Furthermore, studies have shown that in case of residual hearing, patients benefit from the use of a hearing aid in addition to the cochlear implant. The presented studies aim at the improvement of this electromechanical stimulation (EMS) approach by substituting the external hearing aid by an internal stimulus provided by miniaturized piezoelectric actuators. Finite element analyses are performed in order to derive fundamental guidelines for the actuator layout aiming at maximal mechanical stimuli. Further analyses aim at investigating how the actuator position inside the cochlea influences the basilar membrane oscillation profile. While actuator layout guidelines leading to maximized acoustic stimuli could be derived, some of these guidelines are of complementary nature suggesting that further studies under realistic boundary conditions must be performed. Actuator positioning inside the cochlea is shown to have a significant influence on the resulting auditory impression of the patient. Based on the results, the main differences of external and internal stimulation of the cochlea mechanism are identified. It is shown that if the cochlea tonotopy is considered, the frequency selectivity resulting from the mechanical cochlea stimulus may be improved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Cochlear mechanics; EAS; EMS; Piezo actuator; Vibration analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28900873     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1720-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  21 in total

Review 1.  The piezoelectric cochlear implant: concept, feasibility, challenges, and issues.

Authors:  N Mukherjee; R D Roseman; J P Willging
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000

2.  Assessment of a direct acoustic cochlear stimulator.

Authors:  Michail Chatzimichalis; Jae Hoon Sim; Alexander M Huber
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Modeling of sound transmission from ear canal to cochlea.

Authors:  Rong Z Gan; Brian P Reeves; Xuelin Wang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Impact of low-frequency hearing.

Authors:  A Büchner; M Schüssler; R D Battmer; T Stöver; A Lesinski-Schiedat; T Lenarz
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Paula Incerti; Mandy Hill
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade.

Authors:  Christoph A von Ilberg; Uwe Baumann; Jan Kiefer; Jochen Tillein; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Preservation of auditory brainstem response thresholds after cochleostomy and titanium microactuator implantation in the lateral wall of cat scala tympani.

Authors:  S George Lesinski; Jessica Prewitt; Victor Bray; Radhika Aravamudhan; Oscar A Bermeo Blanco; Brenda L Farmer-Fedor; Jonette A Ward
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Structural/audiometric correlations in a human inner ear with noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  H Rask-Andersen; L Ekvall; A Scholtz; A Schrott-Fischer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Ersin Avci; Tim Nauwelaers; Thomas Lenarz; Volkmar Hamacher; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.