| Literature DB >> 28900862 |
John M Radnor1, Jon L Oliver2,3, Charlie M Waugh4, Gregory D Myer5,6,7, Isabel S Moore2, Rhodri S Lloyd2,3,8.
Abstract
Hopping, skipping, jumping and sprinting are common tasks in both active play and competitive sports. These movements utilise the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC), which is considered a naturally occurring muscle action for most forms of human locomotion. This muscle action results in more efficient movements and helps optimise relative force generated per motor unit recruited. Innate SSC development throughout childhood and adolescence enables children to increase power (jump higher and sprint faster) as they mature. Despite these improvements in physical performance, the underpinning mechanisms of SSC development during maturational years remain unclear. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive review of the potential structural and neuromuscular adaptations that underpin the SSC muscle action does not exist in the literature. Considering the importance of the SSC in human movement, it is imperative to understand how neural and structural adaptations throughout growth and maturation can influence this key muscle action. By understanding the factors that underpin functional SSC development, practitioners and clinicians will possess a better understanding of normal development processes, which will help differentiate between training-induced adaptations and those changes that occur naturally due to growth and maturation. Therefore, the focus of this article is to identify the potential underpinning mechanisms that drive development of SSC muscle action and to examine how SSC function is influenced by growth and maturation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 28900862 PMCID: PMC5752749 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0785-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports Med ISSN: 0112-1642 Impact factor: 11.136
Fig. 1Visual representation of the primary mechanisms underpinning growth- and maturity-related changes in stretch-shortening cycle function. CSA cross-sectional area, EMD electromagnetic delay, MU motor-unit, RFD rate of force development, SSC stretch-shortening cycle, RER rate of EMG rise
Influence of structural and neural adaptations throughout biological maturation on stretch-shortening cycle function
| Adaptation with maturation? | Influence on kinetic variables | Likely influence on stretch–shortening cycle function | Supporting evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fibre type composition | Force production | Increased force production | [ |
| Increased muscle size | Force production | Increased impulse | [ |
| Increased pennation angle | L-T and F-V relationship | Increased force production | [ |
| Increased fascicle length | Shortening velocity | Increased RFD | [ |
| Increased tendon size | Rate of force production | Increased tendon stiffness | [ |
| Increased tendon stiffness | Rate of force production | Increased RFD | [ |
| MU recruitment | Force production | Increased RFD | [ |
| Co-contraction | Force production | Increased EE reutilisation | [ |
| Preactivation | Rate of force production | Reduced EMD | [ |
| Reflex control | Force production | Increased force production | [ |
| RER | Rate of force production | Increased RFD | [ |
EE elastic energy, EMD electromagnetic delay, F-V force–velocity, L-T length–tension, MU motor-unit, RER rate of EMG rise, RFD rate of force development
| Stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) performance increases with age in various forms of hopping, jumping, and sprinting tasks. |
| Research suggests that changes in the neuromuscular system during growth and maturation include increases in muscle size, pennation angle, fascicle length, tendon stiffness, motor unit recruitment and preactivation. |
| Combined, these adaptations may result in an improved SSC function due to increased elastic energy reutilisation, increased neural potentiation and an enhanced stretch-reflex contribution, predominantly due to an increase in force producing capabilities and a reduced electro-mechanical delay. |