Literature DB >> 28900854

Relationships between serum PSA levels, Gleason scores and results of 68Ga-PSMAPET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.

Yasemin Sanli1, Serkan Kuyumcu2, Oner Sanli3, Fikret Buyukkaya4, Ayça İribaş5, Goksel Alcin2, Emin Darendeliler5, Yasemin Ozluk6, Sevda Ozel Yildiz7, Cüneyt Turkmen2.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the relationship between serum PSA level, Gleason score of PCa and the outcomes of Ga68-PSMA PET/CT in patients with recurrent PCa.
METHODS: A total of 109 consecutive patients (median age 71 years; range 48-89 years) who had PSA recurrence after RP and/or hormonotherapy and/or radiotherapy were included in this study. Local recurrences, lymph node metastasis (pelvic, abdominal and/or supradiaphragmatic), bone metastases (oligometastatic/multimetastatic) and other metastatic sites (lung, liver, brain, etc) were documented.
RESULTS: In 91(83.4%) patients at least one lesion characteristic for PCa was detected by68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The median serum total PSA (tPSA) was 6.5 (0.2-640) ng/ml.There was a significant difference between 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT positive and negative patients in terms of serum total PSA value. No statistical significance was found between positive and negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT findings in terms of Gleason score. Local recurrence was detected in 56 patients. whereas lymph node metastases were demonstrated in 46 patients. Pelvic nodal disease was the most frequent presentation followed by abdominal and supradiaphragmaticnodal involvement. Bone metastases [oligometastasis, (n = 20); multimetastasis, (n = 35)⦌ were also detected in 55 patients. In the ROC analysis for the study cohort, the optimal cut-off value of total serum PSA was determined as 0.67 ng/ml for distinguishing between positive and negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images, with an area under curve of 0.952 (95% CI 0.911-0.993).
CONCLUSIONS: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was found to be an effective tool for the detection of recurrent PCa. Even though no relationship was detected between the GS and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT findings, serum total PSA values may be used for estimating the likelihood of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  68Ga-PSMA; Gleason score; PSA value; Recurrent prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28900854     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-017-1207-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  11 in total

Review 1.  Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Validated by Histopathology.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Jeremy Z Goodman; Isabel E Allen; Jeremie Calais; Wolfgang P Fendler; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Highlights from 2017: impactful topics published in the Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Andrea Farolfi; Pietro Ghedini; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Comparison of 68 Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT versus conventional cross-sectional imaging for target volume delineation for metastasis-directed radiotherapy for metachronous lymph node metastases from prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Walacides; Astrid Meier; Anne Caroline Knöchelmann; Daniele Meinecke; Thorsten Derlin; Frank M Bengel; Tobias L Ross; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Katja Derlin; Markus A Kuczyk; Christoph A J von Klot; Hans Christiansen; Christoph Henkenberens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weili Ma; Jiwei Mao; Jianfeng Yang; Ting Wang; Zhen Hua Zhao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  PSMA whole-body tumor burden in primary staging and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Allan Santos; Aline Mattiolli; José Bc Carvalheira; Ubirajara Ferreira; Mariana Camacho; Cleide Silva; Fernanda Costa; Wagner Matheus; Mariana Lima; Elba Etchebehere
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the treatment of prostate cancer: Initial experience in Spain.

Authors:  Felipe Couñago; Claudio Martínez-Ballesteros; Carlos Artigas; Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela; Luis Leonardo Guerrero Gómez; María Eugenia Lillo-García; José Reinaldo Chicharo; Manuel Recio; Antonio Maldonado; Israel J Thuissard; Cristina Andreu-Vázquez; David Sanz-Rosa; Antonio José Conde-Moreno; Francisco José Marcos; Sofía Sánchez García; Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca; Joaquin Carballido-Rodríguez; Javier Hornedo; Elia Del Cerro
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-04-12

7.  Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-PET imaging on target volume definition and guidelines in radiation oncology - a patterns of failure analysis in patients with primary diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Schiller; M Devecka; T Maurer; M Eiber; J Gschwend; M Schwaiger; S E Combs; G Habl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  Use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for detecting lymph node metastases in primary and recurrent prostate cancer and location of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: an overview of the current literature.

Authors:  Henk B Luiting; Pim J van Leeuwen; Martijn B Busstra; Tessa Brabander; Henk G van der Poel; Maarten L Donswijk; André N Vis; Louise Emmett; Phillip D Stricker; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Role of PET imaging for biochemical recurrence following primary treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Roberto Valentin; Jonathan McConathy
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-09

10.  Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging in Early Relapsed Prostate Cancer After Radical Therapy: A Prospective Multicenter Study (IAEA-PSMA Study).

Authors:  Juliano J Cerci; Stefano Fanti; Enrique E Lobato; Jolanta Kunikowska; Omar Alonso; Sevastian Medina; Fuad Novruzov; Thabo Lengana; Carlos Granados; Rakesh Kumar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Akram Al-Ibraheem; Mukbil Hourani; Nor S Ali; Azra Ahmad; Zohar Keidar; Ozlem Küçük; Umut Elboga; Mateos Bogoni; Diana Paez
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.