| Literature DB >> 28900440 |
Haiyan Cen1, Haiyong Weng1, Jieni Yao1, Mubin He1, Jingwen Lv2, Shijia Hua1, Hongye Li2, Yong He1.
Abstract
Huanglongbing (HLB) is one of the most destructive diseases of citrus, which has posed a serious threat to the global citrus production. This research was aimed to explore the use of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging combined with feature selection to characterize and detect the HLB disease. Chlorophyll fluorescence images of citrus leaf samples were measured by an in-house chlorophyll fluorescence imaging system. The commonly used chlorophyll fluorescence parameters provided the first screening of HLB disease. To further explore the photosynthetic fingerprint of HLB infected leaves, three feature selection methods combined with the supervised classifiers were employed to identify the unique fluorescence signature of HLB and perform the three-class classification (i.e., healthy, HLB infected, and nutrient deficient leaves). Unlike the commonly used fluorescence parameters, this novel data-driven approach by using the combination of the mean fluorescence parameters and image features gave the best classification performance with the accuracy of 97%, and presented a better interpretation for the spatial heterogeneity of photochemical and non-photochemical components in HLB infected citrus leaves. These results imply the potential of the proposed approach for the citrus HLB disease diagnosis, and also provide a valuable insight for the photosynthetic response to the HLB disease.Entities:
Keywords: Huanglongbing; chlorophyll fluorescence imaging; citrus; classification; feature selection; photosynthesis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28900440 PMCID: PMC5581828 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Classification results based on chlorophyll fluorescence parameter analysis with the optimal features.
| Feature | First three | Classifier | Feature | Healthy (%) | HLB infected (%) | Nutrient | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| selection | selected features | number | deficient (%) | accuracy (%) | |||
| RF | PLS-DA | 7 | 80 | 80 | 50 | 70 | |
| SVM | 23 | 80 | 90 | 100 | 90 | ||
| SFS | PLS-DA | 6 | 90 | 80 | 80 | 83 | |
| SVM | 11 | 80 | 90 | 100 | 90 | ||
| MC-UVE | PLS-DA | 13 | 90 | 80 | 50 | 73 | |
| SVM | 23 | 80 | 90 | 100 | 90 |
Support vector machine (SVM) classification results based on the principal component (PC) image features and the combination of image features and mean fluorescence parameters.
| Sample status | PC images | Combination of PC image features | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| features | and mean fluorescence parameters | |||||
| Healthy | HLB infected | Nutrient deficient | Healthy | HLB infected | Nutrient deficient | |
| Healthy | 8 (80%) | 2 | 0 | 10 (100%) | 0 | 0 |
| HLB infected | 0 | 7 (70%) | 3 | 0 | 9 (90%) | 1 |
| Nutrient deficient | 0 | 2 | 8 (80%) | 0 | 0 | 10 (100%) |
| Overall accuracy | 77% | 97% | ||||