Literature DB >> 34145424

Single-step genomic prediction of Eucalyptus dunnii using different identity-by-descent and identity-by-state relationship matrices.

Esteban J Jurcic1,2, Pamela V Villalba3,4, Pablo S Pathauer5, Dino A Palazzini5, Gustavo P J Oberschelp6, Leonel Harrand6, Martín N Garcia3,4, Natalia C Aguirre3,4, Cintia V Acuña4, María C Martínez4, Juan G Rivas3,4, Esteban F Cisneros7, Juan A López8, Susana N Marcucci Poltri4, Sebastián Munilla3,9, Eduardo P Cappa5,3.   

Abstract

Genomic selection based on the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) approach is becoming an important tool in forest tree breeding. The quality of the variance components and the predictive ability of the estimated breeding values (GEBV) depends on how well marker-based genomic relationships describe the actual genetic relationships at unobserved causal loci. We investigated the performance of GEBV obtained when fitting models with genomic covariance matrices based on two identity-by-descent (IBD) and two identity-by-state (IBS) relationship measures. Multiple-trait multiple-site ssGBLUP models were fitted to diameter and stem straightness in five open-pollinated progeny trials of Eucalyptus dunnii, genotyped using the EUChip60K. We also fitted the conventional ABLUP model with a pedigree-based covariance matrix. Estimated relationships from the IBD estimators displayed consistently lower standard deviations than those from the IBS approaches. Although ssGBLUP based in IBS estimators resulted in higher trait-site heritabilities, the gain in accuracy of the relationships using IBD estimators has resulted in higher predictive ability and lower bias of GEBV, especially for low-heritability trait-site. ssGBLUP based on IBS and IBD approaches performed considerably better than the traditional ABLUP. In summary, our results advocate the use of the ssGBLUP approach jointly with the IBD relationship matrix in open-pollinated forest tree evaluation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Genetics Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34145424      PMCID: PMC8322403          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-021-00450-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.832


  54 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs.

Authors:  O F Christensen; P Madsen; B Nielsen; T Ostersen; G Su
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A statnet Tutorial.

Authors:  Steven M Goodreau; Mark S Handcock; David R Hunter; Carter T Butts; Martina Morris
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.440

Review 4.  Applications of population genetics to animal breeding, from wright, fisher and lush to genomic prediction.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Understanding the potential bias of variance components estimators when using genomic models.

Authors:  Beatriz C D Cuyabano; A Christian Sørensen; Peter Sørensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped.

Authors:  Ole F Christensen; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; Ana I Vazquez; Rohan Fernando; Yann C Klimentidis; Daniel Sorensen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Effect of Hidden Relatedness on Single-Step Genetic Evaluation in an Advanced Open-Pollinated Breeding Program.

Authors:  Jaroslav Klápšte; Mari Suontama; Heidi S Dungey; Emily J Telfer; Natalie J Graham; Charlie B Low; Grahame T Stovold
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Effect of trait's expression level on single-step genomic evaluation of resistance to Dothistroma needle blight.

Authors:  Jaroslav Klápště; Heidi S Dungey; Natalie J Graham; Emily J Telfer
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of Eucalyptus pellita.

Authors:  Saravanan Thavamanikumar; Roger J Arnold; Jianzhong Luo; Bala R Thumma
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  1 in total

1.  Accounting for population structure in genomic predictions of Eucalyptus globulus.

Authors:  Andrew N Callister; Matias Bermann; Stephen Elms; Ben P Bradshaw; Daniela Lourenco; Jeremy T Brawner
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.542

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.