| Literature DB >> 28900222 |
Niklas J Lehto1, Morten Larsen2,3, Hao Zhang4, Ronnie N Glud2,3,5, William Davison4.
Abstract
Deposition of particulate organic matter (POM) induces diagenetic hot spots at the sediment-water interface (SWI). Here we explore the effects of intensive POM degradation for metal mobilization at the SWI. By using a combined planar optode-DGT (diffusive gradient in thin-films) sensor we obtained simultaneous measurements of dissolved O2 and trace metal dynamics around an aggregate of reactive organic matter placed on the SWI of a sediment mesocosm. The aggregate induced a rapid, highly localized, decrease in O2 concentration, resulting in an anoxic feature at the SWI. Co-located with this feature, we observed intense Fe and Mn mobilization, removal of Co, Ni and Zn and found evidence for the concurrent release and precipitation of Pb within a small confined volume. We also identified two small microniches in the anoxic sediment below the SWI, defined by elevated trace metal mobilization. Differences between the metal release rates in these two microniches indicate that they were formed by the mineralisation of different types of organic matter buried in the sediment. Our results provide direct empirical evidence for the potential importance of POM-induced reactive microniches when considering the fluxes of metals from and within aquatic sediments, and suggest that other elements' cycles may also be affected.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28900222 PMCID: PMC5595988 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10179-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Planar optode measurements of O2 concentrations during the deployment (a) across the sediment at the location of I x and (b) at the centre of the aggregate location. The horizontal dashed line shows the sediment-water interface (SWI), the circular dashed line shows the initial position of the aggregate.
Figure 2Time-integrated fluxes of Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn and Pb sediment (fluxes expressed as fmol cm−2 s−1). The locations of the three microniches, S A, S B and I X are shown on the Fe figure. The areas that qualify as Mn and Fe microniches are shown on the monochrome microniche only images; the location of the possible reaction hotspot in I x is shown in the Fe microniche image in red. The location of the sediment-water interface (SWI) is shown as the dashed grey line on the Fe images.
Maximum (Max.) and average fluxes of metals in the bulk oxic and anoxic sediment (the former excludes I x, the latter includes S A and S B) and the three microniches. The standard deviation of each average is shown in the adjacent brackets. All fluxes are reported as fmol cm−2 s−1. Superscript letters A, B and C indicate where the average flux of metal across the microniche is significantly different from the other microniches (p < 0.05), different letters indicate significant differences between microniches.
| Bulk ‘anoxic’ Sediment ( | Bulk ‘oxic’ Sediment ( |
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe | Max. Average | 49.24 20.02 (±2.96) | 13.51 8.63 (±1.33) | 384.32 95.40A (±91.71) | 37.65 34.87B (±3.21) | 38.39 33.53B (±3.28) |
| Mn | Max. Average | 12.87 9.65 (±0.66) | 9.76 9.15 (±0.29) | ( | ( | ( |
| Co | Max. Average | 1.66 0.67 (±0.25) | 0.72 0.63 (±0.05) |
|
| ( |
| Ni | Max. Average | 2.31 0.81 (±0.25) | 1.80 1.40 (±0.17) |
|
| ( |
| Cu | Max. Average | 2.28 0.02 (±0.09) | 2.01 1.09 (±0.32) |
|
|
|
| Zn | Max.Average | 33.13 15.96 (±3.95) | 41.81 34.19 (±3.47) |
| ( | ( |
| Pb | Max. Average | 0.54 0.04 (±0.02) | 0.08 0.03 (±0.02) | 0.94 0.19A (±0.14) |
|
|
Where the flux of a particular metal was not sufficiently elevated above background to qualify it as a ‘microniche’ for that particular metal (e.g. Ni for I x or S B), the metal fluxes from the measurement points that define the corresponding Fe microniche were used to enable comparison. These are indicated in italic script, where applicable. Otherwise, the number of measurement points (n) is indicated in brackets next to the maximum measured flux for that metal in that microniche. Locations where the mass of metal/unit area is below the detection limit for that metal are designated as “not detected” (N.D.), these were treated as zero concentrations in the calculations of the averages and standard deviations.
Correlation (Pearson’s, R 2) between different metal fluxes in the surface microniche, I x, and the subsurface microniches, S A and S B.
| Surface Microniche, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn | Pb | ||
| Mn |
| 0.124 | 0.100 | 0.004 | 0.058 | 0.287 |
|
| Fe | × | 0.322 | 0.248 | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| |
| Co |
| × |
| 0.017 | 0.164 | 0.297 | |
| Ni |
|
| × | 0.002 | 0.122 | 0.173 | |
| Cu |
|
|
| × | 0.000 | 0.067 | |
| Zn |
|
|
|
| × | 0.102 | |
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Mn | × |
|
| 0.512 | 0.537 | 0.140 |
|
| Fe |
| × |
| 0.484 | 0.568 | 0.096 | |
| Co |
|
| × | 0.632 | 0.531 | 0.191 | |
| Ni |
|
|
| × | 0.065 | 0.712 | |
| Zn |
|
|
|
| × | 0.033 | |
| Pb |
|
|
|
|
| × | |
|
| |||||||
Bold print indicates where there is significant relationship between the fluxes (p < 0.01). Data points used to compare metal release in I , S and S were selected using areas of high Fe mobilization. The value in brackets for Fe vs Pb indicates the correlation where six points are excluded from the comparison. Cu fluxes were not considered in S A and S B because they were below the method detection limit.
Figure 3Time-averaged Fe flux vs. time-averaged Pb flux at individual analysis points inside the designated area of the surface microniche, I x. The two linear regressions, and corresponding R 2 values, show the correlation between Fe and Pb fluxes with and without the points inside the reaction hotspot (dashed and solid black lines, respectively).
Figure 4Experimental Set up (not to scale). Inset shows the DGT-Planar Optode (DGT-PO) sandwich probe mounted onto the Fiber Optic Faceplate (FOFP), including filter membrane (F), SPR-IDA resin (R) and PtTFPP- C545T sensing layer (F-p); thicknesses of the various components are shown in brackets.