Literature DB >> 28898556

Critical Appraisal Tools and Reporting Guidelines for Evidence-Based Practice.

Robin K Buccheri1, Claire Sharifi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurses engaged in evidence-based practice (EBP) have two important sets of tools: Critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines. Critical appraisal tools facilitate the appraisal process and guide a consumer of evidence through an objective, analytical, evaluation process. Reporting guidelines, checklists of items that should be included in a publication or report, ensure that the project or guidelines are reported on with clarity, completeness, and transparency.
PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this paper is to help nurses understand the difference between critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines. A secondary purpose is to help nurses locate the appropriate tool for the appraisal or reporting of evidence.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted to find commonly used critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines for EBP in nursing. RATIONALE: This article serves as a resource to help nurse navigate the often-overwhelming terrain of critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines, and will help both novice and experienced consumers of evidence more easily select the appropriate tool(s) to use for critical appraisal and reporting of evidence. Having the skills to select the appropriate tool or guideline is an essential part of meeting EBP competencies for both practicing registered nurses and advanced practice nurses (Melnyk & Gallagher-Ford, 2015; Melnyk, Gallagher-Ford, & Fineout-Overholt, 2017).
RESULTS: Nine commonly used critical appraisal tools and eight reporting guidelines were found and are described in this manuscript. Specific steps for selecting an appropriate tool as well as examples of each tool's use in a publication are provided. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Practicing registered nurses and advance practice nurses must be able to critically appraise and disseminate evidence in order to meet EBP competencies. This article is a resource for understanding the difference between critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines, and identifying and accessing appropriate tools or guidelines.
© 2017 Sigma Theta Tau International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical appraisal tools; evidence-based nursing; evidence-based practice; reporting guidelines

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28898556     DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs        ISSN: 1545-102X            Impact factor:   2.931


  13 in total

1.  Description of complex interventions: analysis of changes in reporting in randomised trials since 2002.

Authors:  Bridget Candy; Victoria Vickerstaff; Louise Jones; Michael King
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 2.  The state of the science of nurse work environments in the United States: A systematic review.

Authors:  Holly Wei; Kerry A Sewell; Gina Woody; Mary Ann Rose
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  Critical evaluation of publications.

Authors:  N Gopi Chander
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

4.  Dementia as a mortality predictor among older adults with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational study.

Authors:  Ita Daryanti Saragih; Ice Septriani Saragih; Sakti Oktaria Batubara; Chia-Ju Lin
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 2.361

5.  Determinants of Dyslipidemia in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed S Obsa; Getu Ataro; Nefsu Awoke; Bedru Jemal; Tamiru Tilahun; Nugusu Ayalew; Beshada Z Woldegeorgis; Gedion A Azeze; Yusuf Haji
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-23

Review 6.  Ivermectin and the Integrity of Healthcare Evidence During COVID-19.

Authors:  Dónal P O'Mathúna
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-01

7.  The Best Evidence for the Prevention and Management of Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis After Gynecological Malignant Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jiaqi Hu; Yidan Geng; Jingyi Ma; Xuefan Dong; Shuqin Fang; Jianli Tian
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-22

Review 8.  Family Involvement in Caring for Inpatients in Acute Care Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gwaza; Gladys Msiska
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2022-04-11

9.  Frailty as a mortality predictor in older adults with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Ita Daryanti Saragih; Shailesh Advani; Ice Septriani Saragih; Ira Suarilah; Irwan Susanto; Chia-Ju Lin
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.361

10.  Impact of regionalisation and case-volume on neonatal and perinatal mortality: an umbrella review.

Authors:  Jochen Schmitt; Stefanie Deckert; Felix Walther; Denise Bianca Küster; Anja Bieber; Mario Rüdiger; Jürgen Malzahn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.