| Literature DB >> 28898288 |
Dipak Sharma-Poudyal1, Daniel Schlatter2, Chuntao Yin3, Scot Hulbert3, Timothy Paulitz2,3.
Abstract
In the dryland Pacific Northwest wheat cropping systems, no-till is becoming more prevalent as a way to reduce soil erosion and fuel inputs. Tillage can have a profound effect on microbial communities and soilborne fungal pathogens, such as Rhizoctonia. We compared the fungal communities in long-term no-till (NT) plots adjacent to conventionally tilled (CT) plots, over three years at two locations in Washington state and one location in Idaho, US. We used pyrosequencing of the fungal ITS gene and identified 422 OTUs after rarefication. Fungal richness was higher in NT compared to CT, in two of the locations. Humicola nigrescens, Cryptococcus terreus, Cadophora spp. Hydnodontaceae spp., and Exophiala spp. were more abundant in NT, while species of Glarea, Coniochaetales, Mycosphaerella tassiana, Cryptococcus bhutanensis, Chaetomium perlucidum, and Ulocladium chartarum were more abundant in CT in most locations. Other abundant groups that did not show any trends were Fusarium, Mortierella, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Macroventuria. Plant pathogens such as Rhizoctonia (Ceratobasidiaceae) were not abundant enough to see tillage differences, but Microdochium bolleyi, a weak root pathogen, was more abundant in NT. Our results suggest that NT fungi are better adapted at utilizing intact, decaying roots as a food source and may exist as root endophytes. CT fungi can utilize mature plant residues that are turned into the soil with tillage as pioneer colonizers, and then produce large numbers of conidia. But a larger proportion of the fungal community is not affected by tillage and may be niche generalists.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28898288 PMCID: PMC5595340 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184611
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1NMDS plot of fungal communities colored by location (red = Cook Farm, green = Kambitsch Farm, blue = Palouse Conservation farm).
Different symbols indicate sampling year and tillage treatment (CT = conventional tillage, NT = no-till).
Factors determining fungal community structure as assessed by PERMANOVA.
| Factor | F-value | r2 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tillage | 9.55 | 0.08 | |
| Location | 10.99 | 0.17 | |
| Year | 5.76 | 0.09 | |
| Tillage x Location | 5.05 | 0.08 | |
| Tillage x Year | 1.91 | 0.03 | |
| Location x Year | 2.86 | 0.07 | |
| Tillage x Location x Year | 2.14 | 0.05 |
Fig 2NMDS plots of fungal communities within locations colored by tillage treatment (red = conventional tillage, CT; blue = no-till, NT).
Symbols indicate different sampling years.
Effects of tillage and year on soil fungal communities within each location as assessed with PERMANOVA.
| Location | Factor | F-value | r2 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2.17 | 0.098 | ||
| Tillage | 5.57 | 0.252 | ||
| Year x Tillage | 2.35 | 0.106 | ||
| Year | 3.77 | 0.208 | ||
| Tillage | 3.23 | 0.089 | ||
| Year x Tillage | 1.2 | 0.066 | 0.164 | |
| Year | 5.71 | 0.228 | ||
| Tillage | 13.17 | 0.263 | ||
| Year x Tillage | 3.26 | 0.13 |
ANOVA for fungal richness, inverse Simpson's diversity, and Shannon diversity indices among tillage treatments, farm locations, and sampling years.
| Richness (no. OTUs) | Inverse Simpson's (1/D) | Shannon Index (S') | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | F-value | p-value | F-value | p-value | F-value | p-value |
| Tillage | 5.73 | 0 | 0.98 | 1.43 | 0.24 | |
| Location | 2.23 | 0.117 | 8.31 | 2.6 | 0.083 | |
| Year | 45.95 | 20.78 | 19.15 | |||
| Tillage x Location | 2.25 | 0.11 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 0.053 | |
| Tillage x Year | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 0.29 | 0.59 |
| Location x Year | 1.05 | 0.36 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.2 | 0.82 |
| Tillage x Location x Year | 1.94 | 0.15 | 1.64 | 0.2 | 3.62 | |
Fig 3OTU richness (A), Shannon diversity (H’; B), and inverse Simpson’s diversity (1/D; C) between tillage treatments in each year and location.
Fig 4Heatmap of relative abundances of genera representing >0.5% sequences of classified taxa among tillage treatments from different locations.
Shapes by genera names indicate significant differences among tillage treatments (circles), locations (squares), or years (diamonds) as assessed by ANOVA with log transformed values.
OTUs significantly influenced by tillage (ANOVA FDR adjusted p-value <0.05), along with ANOVA p-values for location and year effects.
| Taxonomy | OTU identifiera | Till | Yr | Loc | Till × Yr | Till × Loc | Yr x Loc | Till × Loc × Yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0+ | 0.079 | 1 | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 1 | |
| 0+ | 0+ | 0.001 | 1 | 0.020 | 1 | 0.109 | |
| 0.007 | 0+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.155 | 1 | |
| 0+ | 0.642 | 0.426 | 1 | 0.009 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0.028 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Helotiales sp. | 0.001 | 0+ | 0+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.137 |
| Tremellomycetes sp. | 0+ | 1 | 0.008 | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 1 |
| Helotiales sp. | 0.016 | 0+ | 0.016 | 1 | 1 | 0.779 | 1 |
| Hypocreales sp. | 0.003 | 0.642 | 1 | 1 | 0.218 | 1 | 1 |
| 0+ | 0.135 | 0+ | 1 | 1 | 0.105 | 1 | |
| Hydnodontaceae sp. | 0+ | 1 | 0.021 | 1 | 0.031 | 1 | 1 |
| Coniochaetales sp. | 0.019 | 1 | 0.397 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0.013 | 0+ | 0.835 | 1 | 0.442 | 0.416 | 1 | |
| Incertae sedis sp. | 0+ | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0+ | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 0.003 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0+ | 0.058 | 0.924 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0+ | 1 | 0.001 | 0.204 | 0+ | 1 | 1 | |
| 0.031 | 0.013 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0+ | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 0.218 | 1 | 0.928 | |
| Coniochaetales sp. New.ReferenceOTU4 | 0.001 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0.004 | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 0.946 | |
| 0.002 | 0.303 | 0+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0+ | 0.076 | 0+ | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 0.037 | |
| Fungi sp. SH008253.07FU_FR871193_reps_singleton | 0+ | 0.047 | 0+ | 1 | 0.642 | 1 | 1 |
| Ascomycota sp. SH185508.07FU_KC007266_reps | 0+ | 0.023 | 1 | 1 | 0.030 | 1 | 1 |
| Lasiosphaeriaceae sp. New.ReferenceOTU5 | 0+ | 0.817 | 0+ | 1 | 0+ | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| 0+ | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 1 | |
| 0+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Trechisporales sp. SH188947.07FU_JF691365_reps | 0+ | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 0+ | 1 | 1 |
0+, value <0.001. OTU identifiers correspond to representative sequences in the UNITE v.7 dynamic (31.01.16) reference set.