| Literature DB >> 28895929 |
Veronica Marin1, Silvia Gazzin2, Sabrina E Gambaro3, Matteo Dal Ben4, Sonia Calligaris5, Monica Anese6, Alan Raseni7, Claudio Avellini8, Pablo J Giraudi9, Claudio Tiribelli10, Natalia Rosso11.
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in adolescents is challenging the global care system. No therapeutic strategies have been defined so far, and changes in the lifestyle remain the only alternative. In this study, we assessed the protective effects of silymarin in a juvenile non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) model and the in vitro effects on fat-laden human hepatocytes. C57Bl/6 mice were exposed to HFHC diet immediately after weaning. After eight weeks, animals showed histological signs of NASH. Silymarin was added to the HFHC diet, the treatment continued for additional 12 weeks and the effects on BMI, hepatomegaly, visceral fat, lipid profile, transaminases, HOMA-IR, steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and apoptosis were determined. The switch from HFHC to control diet was used to mimic life style changes. In vitro experiments were performed in parallel in human hepatocytes. HFHC diet supplemented with silymarin showed a significant improvement in glycemia, visceral fat, lipid profile, and liver fibrosis. Moreover, it reduced (both in vitro and in vivo) ALT, hepatic inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Lifestyle changes restored the control group parameters. The data presented show the beneficial effects of the oral administration of silymarin in the absence of changes in the dietary habits in a juvenile model of NASH.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; NASH; fibrosis; in vitro model; in vivo model; silymarin; therapeutic approach
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28895929 PMCID: PMC5622766 DOI: 10.3390/nu9091006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Scheme 1In vivo experimental set-up. The experimentation started at p21 (after weaning), animals were divided in control (CTRL) (black arrow) and high-fat high-carbohydrates (HFHC) (blue arrows) diet. After eight weeks, a group of animals continued with HFHC, whereas in others HFHC diet was switched to silymarin-formulated HFHC (HFHC + SIL) (cyan arrow), to CTRL (HFHC→CTRL) diet (orange arrow) and to CTRL plus the addition of silymarin (HFHC→CTRL + SIL) (green arrow). The trial continued until week 20.
Primer pair sequences.
| NM_008084 | CCAGTATGACTCCACTCACG | CTCGCTCCTGGAAGATGGTG | |
| NM_007393 | CCTTCTTGGGTATGGAATCCTGTG | CAGCACTGTGTTGGCATAGAGG | |
| NM_026384 | CCAAGAAAGGTGGCAGGA | ATGGGAAAGTAGTCTCGGAAG | |
| NM_011333 | TGTGACTCGGACTGTGAT | CATTGAAAGTGTTGAATCTGGAT | |
| NM_013693 | AGACCCTCACACTCAGAT | CTTGGTGGTTTGCTACGA | |
| NM_008176 | CATAGCCACACTCAAGAA | GGACACCTTTTAGCATCT | |
| NM_009140 | ACTTCAAGAACATCCAGAG | TTGAGAGTGGCTATGACT | |
| NM_007392.2 | GGCATCAATCACTTCAAC | TCTGGTCACCTGTATGTA | |
| NM_007742.3 | AAGAAGACATCCCTGAAG | ATACAGATCAAGCATACCT | |
| NM_001101.3 | CGCCGCCAGCTCACCATG | CACGATGGAGGGGAAGACGG | |
| NR_003286.2 | TAACCCGTTGAACCCATT | CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG | |
| NM_000584 | GACATACTCCAAACCTTTCCAC | CTTCTCCACAACCCTCTGC | |
| NM_000594 | GTGAGGAGGACGAACATC | GAGCCAGAAGAGGTTGAG | |
| NM_002982 | CCAGTCACCTGCTGTTAT | CAATGGTCTTGAAGATCACA |
Macroscopic features in males and females.
| Parameters | MALES | FEMALES | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | HFHC | HFHC + SIL | HFHC→CTRL | HFHC→CTRL + SIL | Control | HFHC | HFHC + SIL | HFHC→CTRL | HFHC→CTRL + SIL | |
| Body weight (g) | 29.2 ± 2.6 | 43.4 ± 1.8 *** | 43.7 ± 4.6 | 34.4 ± 2.6 ### | 30.3 ± 3.3 ### | 23.4 ± 1.0 | 35.4 ± 4.3 ** | 31.8 ± 3.4 | 23.5 ± 1.5 ## | 23.9 ± 1.9 ## |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.2 *** | 4.8 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.3 ### | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 4.4 ± 0.5 *** | 3.9 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.2 ### | 2.9 ± 0.1 ## |
| Liver weight (g) | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 1.8 ± 0.2 *** | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 ## | 1.00 ± 0.04 ## | 0.88 ± 0.05 | 1.2 ± 0.1 * | 1.09 ± 0.15 # | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.94 ± 0.01 ## |
| Perigonadal Fat Pads (g) | 0.98 ± 0.08 | 2.4 ± 0.3 *** | 2.3 ± 0.2 # | 1.3 ± 0.28 ## | 1.0 ± 0.4 ## | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 1.5 ± 0.6 ** | 0.9 ± 0.3 # | 0.32 ± 0.09 ### | 0.27 ± 0.07 ### |
At the end of the trial the total body, the liver and the perigonadal fat pads weight were measured and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated. * p < 0.05 vs. CTRL; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL; *** p < 0.001 vs. CTRL and # p < 0.05 vs. HFHC; ## p < 0.01 vs. HFHC; ### p < 0.001 vs. HFHC.
Changes in glucose homeostasis.
| Parameters | MALES | FEMALES | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | HFHC | HFHC + SIL | HFHC→CTRL | HFHC→CTRL + SIL | Control | HFHC | HFHC + SIL | HFHC→CTRL | HFHC→CTRL + SIL | |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 164 ± 20 | 260 ± 24 *** | 226 ± 17 # | 167 ± 13 ## | 187 ± 17 ## | 141 ± 10 | 193 ± 25 ** | 181 ± 31 | 134 ± 6 ### | 142 ± 12 ### |
| Insulinemia (µU/mL) | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 1.1 ** | 3.6 ± 1.3 | 2.0 ± 1.2 ## | 1.5 ± 0.7 ### | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 1.7 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.3 # | 1.2 ± 0.4 # |
| HOMA-IR | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 0.7 * | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 0.6 ± 0.1 ## | 0.7 ± 0.4 ## | 0.3 ± 0.004 | 1.3 ± 1.0 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.2 |
In the table are reported the values of glycemia, insulinemia as well as de HOMA-IR after the trial. * p < 0.05 vs. CTRL; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL; *** p < 0.001 vs. CTRL and # p < 0.05 vs. HFHC; ## p < 0.01 vs. HFHC; ### p < 0.01 vs. HFHC.
Figure 1Effect of silymarin-containing food on the lipid profile. The amount of (A) total cholesterol; (B) LDL cholesterol; and (C) HDL cholesterol was measured in all the experimental groups. * p < 0.05 vs. CTRL; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL; *** p < 0.001 vs. CTRL and ° p < 0.05 vs. HFHC; °° p < 0.01 vs. HFHC; °°° p < 0.001 vs. HFHC.
Figure 2Assessment of the ALT activity. The ALT activity was measured (A) in vivo in all the experimental groups and confirmed (B) in vitro on fat-laden human hepatocytes (HuH7). * p < 0.05 vs. CTRL; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL and ° p < 0.05 vs. HFHC; °° p < 0.01 vs. HFHC.
Histological features.
| MALES | FEMALES | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | CTRL | HFHC | HFHC + SIL | HFHC→CTRL | HFHC→CTRL +SIL | CTRL | HFHC | HFHC + SIL | HFHC→CTRL | HFHC→CTRL +SIL |
| Steatosis Grade (0–3) | 2 (100%) | 3 (100%) | 3 (60%) | 2 (50%) | 1 (60%) | 1 (33%) | 1 (20%) | 2 (100%) | 1 (75%) | 2(100%) |
| Location (score 0–3) | 3 (100%) | 3 (40%) | 3 (60%) | 3 (75%) | 2 (100%) | 3 (100%) | 0 (20%) | 0 (33.3%) | 2 (100%) | 2 (100%) |
| Portal Inflammation (score 0–1) | 1 (100%) | 0 (100%) | 0 (88%) | 1 (50%) | 0 (100%) | 0 (100%) | 0 (60%) | 0 (50%) | 0 (25%) | 0 (100%) |
| Lobular Inflammation Score (0–3) | 0 (20%) | 0 (80%) | 0 (40%) | 1 (75%) | 1 (100%) | 1 (66%) | 0 (40%) | 1 (100%) | 0 (25%) | 0 (100%) |
| Fibrosis Stage (0–4) | 1a (80%) | 1a (60%) | 1a (50%) | 1a (50%) | 1a (100%) | 1a (83.3%) | 1a (40%) | 1a (83.3%) | 0 (25%) | 1a (100%) |
Histological analysis according to Brunt’s classification. Data is expressed as score/grade and between brackets the occurrence.
Figure 3Hepatic histological and molecular features upon silymarin supplementation. Representative slices of liver samples stained with hematoxylin-eosin staining (A–E), with higher magnification of the dashed area (F–J). Gӧmӧri Staining for fibrosis assessment (K–O). Collagen staining was done by Sirius Red/Fast Green staining (P–T). The µg of collagen was quantified in all groups and normalized by mg/protein (U). The mRNA gene expression of Col1a1 (V) and α-Sma (W) were was assessed by RT-PCR. * p < 0.05 vs. CTRL; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL; *** p < 0.001 vs. CTRL and ° p < 0.05 vs. HFHC; °° p < 0.01 vs. HFHC; Hepatic histological and molecular features upon silymarin supplementation.
Figure 4Molecular analysis of hepatic pro-inflammatory genes. The expression of pro-inflammatory mediators was assessed both in vivo (A–D) and in vitro (E–F). ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL; *** p < 0.001 vs. CTRL and ° p < 0.05 vs. HFHC; °° p < 0.01 vs. HFHC.
Figure 5Assessment of antioxidant properties of silymarin formulation. The redox state was calculated in vivo as the amount of lipoperoxides (MDA) (A) and the cellular antioxidant properties measured as the glutathione ratio (GSH/GSSG) (B). Whereas, in vitro were measured the total amount of reactive oxygen species (C). * p < 0.05 vs. CTRL; ° p < 0.05 vs. HFHC; °° p < 0.01 vs. HFHC.
Figure 6Effect of silymarin formulation on apoptosis. The number of cells undergoing apoptosis was counted in vivo (A) and in vitro (B). ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL; *** p < 0.001 vs. CTRL; ° p < 0.05 vs. HFHC; °°° p < 0.001 vs. HFHC.