Julia Lowin1, Kavita Sail2, Rakhi Baj3, Yash J Jalundhwala2, Thomas S Marshall2, Henrietta Konwea1, K R Chaudhuri4,5. 1. a QuintilesIMS , London , UK. 2. b AbbVie , North Chicago , IL , USA. 3. c AbbVie Ireland , Dublin , Ireland. 4. d National Parkinson Foundation Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital and King's College London , London , UK. 5. e University Hospital Lewisham , London , UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is an incurable, progressive neurological condition, with symptoms impacting movement, walking, and posture that eventually become severely disabling. Advanced PD (aPD) has a significant impact on quality-of-life (QoL) for patients and their caregivers/families. Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is indicated for the treatment of advanced levodopa-responsive PD with severe motor fluctuations and hyper-/dyskinesia when available combinations of therapy have not given satisfactory results. AIMS: To determine the cost-effectiveness of LCIG vs standard of care (SoC) for the treatment of aPD patients. METHODS: A Markov model was used to evaluate LCIG vs SoC in a hypothetical cohort of 100 aPD patients with severe motor fluctuations from an Irish healthcare perspective. Model health states were defined by Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) scale-combined with amount of time in OFF-time-and death. SoC comprised of standard oral therapy ± subcutaneous apomorphine infusion and standard follow-up visits. Clinical efficacy, utilities, and transition probabilities were derived from published studies. Resource use was estimated from individual patient-level data from Adelphi 2012 UK dataset, using Irish costs, where possible. Time horizon was 20 years. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 4%. Both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for LCIG vs SOC was €26,944/quality adjusted life year (QALY) (total costs and QALYs for LCIG vs SoC: €537,687 vs €514,037 and 4.37 vs 3.49, respectively). LCIG is cost-effective at a payer threshold of €45,000. The model was most sensitive to health state costs. CONCLUSION: LCIG is a cost-effective treatment option compared with SoC in patients with aPD.
BACKGROUND:Parkinson's disease (PD) is an incurable, progressive neurological condition, with symptoms impacting movement, walking, and posture that eventually become severely disabling. Advanced PD (aPD) has a significant impact on quality-of-life (QoL) for patients and their caregivers/families. Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is indicated for the treatment of advanced levodopa-responsive PD with severe motor fluctuations and hyper-/dyskinesia when available combinations of therapy have not given satisfactory results. AIMS: To determine the cost-effectiveness of LCIG vs standard of care (SoC) for the treatment of aPD patients. METHODS: A Markov model was used to evaluate LCIG vs SoC in a hypothetical cohort of 100 aPD patients with severe motor fluctuations from an Irish healthcare perspective. Model health states were defined by Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) scale-combined with amount of time in OFF-time-and death. SoC comprised of standard oral therapy ± subcutaneous apomorphine infusion and standard follow-up visits. Clinical efficacy, utilities, and transition probabilities were derived from published studies. Resource use was estimated from individual patient-level data from Adelphi 2012 UK dataset, using Irish costs, where possible. Time horizon was 20 years. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 4%. Both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for LCIG vs SOC was €26,944/quality adjusted life year (QALY) (total costs and QALYs for LCIG vs SoC: €537,687 vs €514,037 and 4.37 vs 3.49, respectively). LCIG is cost-effective at a payer threshold of €45,000. The model was most sensitive to health state costs. CONCLUSION:LCIG is a cost-effective treatment option compared with SoC in patients with aPD.
Entities:
Keywords:
Parkinson’s disease; advanced Parkinson’s disease; cost-effectiveness; levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel
Authors: Arturo Cuomo; Anna Crispo; Andrea Truini; Silvia Natoli; Orazio Zanetti; Paolo Barone; Marco Cascella Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: K Ray Chaudhuri; A Simon Pickard; Ali Alobaidi; Yash J Jalundhwala; Prasanna L Kandukuri; Yanjun Bao; Julia Sus; Glynn Jones; Christian Ridley; Julia Oddsdottir; Seyavash Najle-Rahim; Matthew Madin-Warburton; Weiwei Xu; Anette Schrag Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 4.558
Authors: Katarzyna Smilowska; Daniel J van Wamelen; Tomasz Pietrzykowski; Alexander Calvano; Carmen Rodriguez-Blazquez; Pablo Martinez-Martin; Per Odin; K Ray Chaudhuri Journal: J Parkinsons Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 5.568