Literature DB >> 31061835

Economic Evaluation of Interventions in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Literature Review.

Nafsika Afentou1,2, Johan Jarl1, Ulf-G Gerdtham1,3,4, Sanjib Saha1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) management comprises of drug treatments, surgery, and physical activity/occupational therapies to relieve PD's symptoms. The aim of this study is twofold; first, to appraise recent economic evaluation studies on PD management in order to update the existing knowledge; and second, to facilitate decision making on PD management by assessing the cost-effectiveness of all types of PD interventions.
METHODS: A systematic search for studies published between 2010 and 2018 was conducted. The inclusion and exclusion of the articles were based on criteria relevant to population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study design (PICO). The reporting quality of the articles was assessed according to Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles were included, 10 of which were evaluations of drug treatments, 10 deep brain stimulation (DBS), and eight physical/occupational therapies. Among early-stage treatments, Ti Ji dominated all physical activity interventions; however, its cost-effectiveness should be further explored in relation to its duration, intensity, and frequency. Multidisciplinary interventions of joint medical and nonmedical therapies provided slightly better health outcomes for the same costs. In advanced PD patients, adjunct drug treatments could become more cost-effective if introduced during early PD and, although DBS was more cost-effective than adjunct drug therapies, the results were time-bound.
CONCLUSIONS: Conditionally, certain PD interventions are cost-effective. However, PD progression differs in each patient; thus, the cost-effectiveness of individually tailored combinations of interventions that could provide more time in less severe disease states and improve patients' and caregivers' quality of life, should be further explored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Parkinson's disease; Parkinson's disease management; cost‐effectiveness; economic evaluations

Year:  2019        PMID: 31061835      PMCID: PMC6476603          DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract        ISSN: 2330-1619


  70 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis in Parkinson's disease: determining the value of interventions.

Authors:  A D Siderowf; R G Holloway; M B Stern
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 2.  Dopamine agonists: their role in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  D J Brooks
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Evaluating rehabilitation using cost-consequences analysis: an example in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Heather Gage; Julie Kaye; Charles Owen; Patrick Trend; Derrick Wade
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.477

4.  Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations.

Authors:  Christopher G Goetz; Werner Poewe; Olivier Rascol; Cristina Sampaio; Glenn T Stebbins; Carl Counsell; Nir Giladi; Robert G Holloway; Charity G Moore; Gregor K Wenning; Melvin D Yahr; Lisa Seidl
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 5.  Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review.

Authors:  Chaim M Bell; David R Urbach; Joel G Ray; Ahmed Bayoumi; Allison B Rosen; Dan Greenberg; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-22

6.  Cost of illness and its predictors for Parkinson's disease in Germany.

Authors:  Annika E Spottke; Martin Reuter; Olaf Machat; Bernhard Bornschein; Sonja von Campenhausen; Karin Berger; Rudolf Koehne-Volland; Jürgen Rieke; Alexander Simonow; Dirk Brandstaedter; Uwe Siebert; Wolfgang H Oertel; Gudrun Ulm; Richard Dodel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Rasagiline as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations (LARGO, Lasting effect in Adjunct therapy with Rasagiline Given Once daily, study): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial.

Authors:  O Rascol; D J Brooks; E Melamed; W Oertel; W Poewe; F Stocchi; E Tolosa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Economic and health-related quality of life considerations of new therapies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  L M Rubenstein; A DeLeo; E A Chrischilles
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.

Authors:  Stavros Petrou; Christine Hockley
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Economic burden and quality of life impairment increase with severity of PD.

Authors:  T Keränen; S Kaakkola; K Sotaniemi; V Laulumaa; T Haapaniemi; T Jolma; H Kola; A Ylikoski; O Satomaa; J Kovanen; E Taimela; H Haapaniemi; H Turunen; A Takala
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.891

View more
  3 in total

1.  Wuzi Yanzong pill attenuates MPTP-induced Parkinson's Disease via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Authors:  Wei Hang; Hui-Jie Fan; Yan-Rong Li; Qi Xiao; Lu Jia; Li-Juan Song; Yao Gao; Xiao-Ming Jin; Bao-Guo Xiao; Jie-Zhong Yu; Cun-Gen Ma; Zhi Chai
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 3.584

2.  Patient Utilities in Health States Based on Hoehn and Yahr and Off-Time in Parkinson's Disease: A Swedish Register-Based Study in 1823 Observations.

Authors:  Jenny M Norlin; Klas Kellerborg; Per Odin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The Choice Between Advanced Therapies for Parkinson's Disease Patients: Why, What, and When?

Authors:  Joke M Dijk; Alberto J Espay; Regina Katzenschlager; Rob M A de Bie
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 5.568

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.