Literature DB >> 28895113

Validation of the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer using the National Cancer Database.

Haejin In1, I Solsky2, B Palis3, M Langdon-Embry2, J Ajani4, T Sano5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 8th edition AJCC gastric cancer staging manual was refined using Japanese and Korean data from the International Gastric Cancer Association (IGCA). This study evaluated the eighth edition's validity for U.S.
METHODS: National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to obtain data on gastric cancer patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2008 who underwent surgery and to examine differences in stage grouping and survival between AJCC 7th and 8th editions. Discrimination of models derived from NCDB and IGCA data was compared.
RESULTS: Of 12,041 patients, median age was 65, 57.6% were male, median lymph nodes retrieved was 2 (0-76), 30.9% underwent distal/partial gastrectomy, and 49.8% received no adjuvant treatment. The 8th edition differed in that T1-T3 disease was upstaged with N3b, T4aN3a was downstaged from IIIC to IIIB, and T4bN0 and T4aN2 were downstaged from IIIB to IIIA. These changes resulted in increased patients in IIIA (1436 in the 7th edition to 2310 in the 8th) and IIIB (1737-1896) and decreased in IIIC (2100-1067). This also resulted in lower median survival for IIIA (28.7-25.0 months), IIIB (19.6-17.4), IIIC (13.7-11.8). The concordance index for the 8th edition applied to NCDB data was 0.719 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.703-0.734), which is comparable to that for the 8th edition developed from IGCA data (0.775, 95% CI 0.770-0.780) and the 7th edition applied to NCDB data (0.720, 95% CI 0.704-0.735).
CONCLUSIONS: The 8th edition is valid for U.S. populations, showing clear separation of data with preservation of group order.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28895113     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6078-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  84 in total

1.  Maspin suppresses cell invasion and migration in gastric cancer through inhibiting EMT and angiogenesis via ITGB1/FAK pathway.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Li-Li Chang
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.174

2.  Insufficient examined lymph node count underestimates staging in pN3a patients after curative gastrectomy: a multicenter study with external validation.

Authors:  Yinping Dong; Yiran Qiu; Jingyu Deng; Wei Wang; Zhe Sun; Zhenning Wang; Zhiwei Zhou; Huimian Xu; Han Liang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Effects of S-1 combined with palliative care on immune function and quality of life of patients with advanced stomach cancer.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Guozhong Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Siewert III esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: does TNM 8th save us?

Authors:  Andrea Zanoni; Giuseppe Verlato; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Francesco Casella; Andrea Cossu; Alessia d'Ignazio; Stefano De Pascale; Simone Giacopuzzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-05-28

5.  Intra-tumoral FGFR2 Expression Predicts Prognosis and Chemotherapy Response in Advanced HER2-positive Gastric Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Naohiko Nakamura; Daisuke Kaida; Yasuto Tomita; Takashi Miyata; Tomoharu Miyashita; Hideto Fujita; Shinichi Kinami; Nobuhiko Ueda; Hiroyuki Takamura
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2022-05-03

6.  Long noncoding RNA TSLNC8 enhances pancreatic cancer aggressiveness by regulating CTNNB1 expression via association with HuR.

Authors:  Wei Chai; Ruhai Liu; Fengshan Li; Zhiquan Zhang; Bao Lei
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  A Simplified Two-Step Technique for Extended Lymphadenectomy During Resection of Gastroesophageal Malignancy: Early Results Compared to En Bloc Dissection.

Authors:  Michael J Minarich; Roderich E Schwarz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Tumor deposit indicates worse prognosis than metastatic lymph node in gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Jianan Tan; Bin Yang; Zhimeng Xu; Shengning Zhou; Zhitao Chen; Jing Huang; Han Gao; Senyou Zheng; Liqiang Wen; Fanghai Han
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

9.  Survival outcomes of patients with pathological stage I gastric cancer using the competing risks survival method.

Authors:  Victor Hugo Fonseca de Jesus; Wilson Luiz da Costa; Tiago Cordeiro Felismino; Vinicius Fernando Calsavara; Alessandro Landskron Diniz; Heber Salvador de Castro Ribeiro; André Luis de Godoy; Igor Correia de Farias; Felipe José Fernandez Coimbra
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-12

10.  Clinical trends and effects on quality metrics for surgical gastroesophageal cancer care.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.