Literature DB >> 28894927

How to differentiate acute pelvic inflammatory disease from acute appendicitis ? A decision tree based on CT findings.

Kim El Hentour1, Ingrid Millet2, Emmanuelle Pages-Bouic1, Fernanda Curros-Doyon1, Nicolas Molinari3, Patrice Taourel1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To construct a decision tree based on CT findings to differentiate acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) from acute appendicitis (AA) in women with lower abdominal pain and inflammatory syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board and informed consent was waived. Contrast-enhanced CT studies of 109 women with acute PID and 218 age-matched women with AA were retrospectively and independently reviewed by two radiologists to identify CT findings predictive of PID or AA. Surgical and laboratory data were used for the PID and AA reference standard. Appropriate tests were performed to compare PID and AA and a CT decision tree using the classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm was generated.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 28 years (interquartile range, 22-39 years). According to the decision tree, an appendiceal diameter ≥ 7 mm was the most discriminating criterion for differentiating acute PID and AA, followed by a left tubal diameter ≥ 10 mm, with a global accuracy of 98.2 % (95 % CI: 96-99.4).
CONCLUSION: Appendiceal diameter and left tubal thickening are the most discriminating CT criteria for differentiating acute PID from AA. KEY POINTS: • Appendiceal diameter and marked left tubal thickening allow differentiating PID from AA. • PID should be considered if appendiceal diameter is < 7 mm. • Marked left tubal diameter indicates PID rather than AA when enlarged appendix. • No pathological CT findings were identified in 5 % of PID patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendicitis; Computed tomography; Fallopian tube; Pelvic inflammatory disease; Salpingitis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28894927     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5032-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

1.  Clinical prediction rule to distinguish pelvic inflammatory disease from acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age.

Authors:  Koji Morishita; Masanori Gushimiyagi; Mikio Hashiguchi; Gerald H Stein; Yasuharu Tokuda
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  CT findings of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Mi Hee Lee; Min Hoan Moon; Chang Kyu Sung; Hyunsik Woo; Sohee Oh
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2014-12

Review 3.  [Microbiologic basis of diagnosis and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease].

Authors:  R Quentin; R Verdon
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2012-11-08

4.  Acute pelvic inflammatory disease: diagnostic performance of CT.

Authors:  Sung Il Jung; Young Jun Kim; Hee Sun Park; Hae Jeong Jeon; Kyung-Ah Jeong
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  The nonvisualized appendix: incidence of acute appendicitis when secondary inflammatory changes are absent.

Authors:  Paul Nikolaidis; Caroline M Hwang; Frank H Miller; Nicholas Papanicolaou
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Ives; Susan Sung; Peter McCue; Haroon Durrani; Ethan J Halpern
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Laparoscopic versus clinical diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  R Morcos; N Frost; M Hnat; A Petrunak; G Caldito
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 0.142

8.  Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. A cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results.

Authors:  L Weström; R Joesoef; G Reynolds; A Hagdu; S E Thompson
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Misdiagnosis of appendicitis in nonpregnant women of childbearing age.

Authors:  S G Rothrock; S M Green; M Dobson; S A Colucciello; C M Simmons
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Pelvic Pain in the Reproductive Age Group.

Authors:  Priyadarshani R Bhosale; Marcia C Javitt; Mostafa Atri; Robert D Harris; Stella K Kang; Benjamin J Meyer; Pari V Pandharipande; Caroline Reinhold; Gloria M Salazar; Thomas D Shipp; Lynn Simpson; Betsy L Sussman; Jennifer Uyeda; Darci J Wall; Carolyn M Zelop; Phyllis Glanc
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.657

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Acute Pelvic pain in women-gynecological causes].

Authors:  Stefan Hecht; Matthias Meissnitzer; Rosemarie Forstner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Differentiation between pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: a decision tree model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative radiomic features.

Authors:  Fei Dong; Qian Li; Duo Xu; Wenji Xiu; Qiang Zeng; Xiuliang Zhu; Fangfang Xu; Biao Jiang; Minming Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Relative CT number of periappendiceal fat stranding may be an applicable index for estimating the severity of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Xinhong Song; Mingqi Shi; Wei Liu; Yansong Ge; Peiyuan Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Meta-analysis of studies comparing conservative treatment with antibiotics and appendectomy for acute appendicitis in the adult.

Authors:  Zhengyang Yang; Feng Sun; Shichao Ai; Jiafeng Wang; Wenxian Guan; Song Liu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Hospitalization Trends for Acute Appendicitis in Spain, 1998 to 2017.

Authors:  Concepción Carratalá-Munuera; Jessica Del Rocio Pilco; Domingo Orozco-Beltrán; Antonio Compañ; Jose A Quesada; Rauf Nouni-García; Vicente F Gil-Guillén; Luis García-Ortíz; Adriana López-Pineda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.