Literature DB >> 28894763

Adaptive anatomical preservation optimal denoising for radiation therapy daily MRI.

Rapeepan Maitree1, Gloria J Guzman Perez-Carrillo2,3, Joshua S Shimony2, H Michael Gach1,2,4, Anupama Chundury1, Michael Roach1, H Harold Li1, Deshan Yang1,4.   

Abstract

Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently been integrated with radiation therapy systems to provide image guidance for daily cancer radiation treatments. The main benefit of the low-field strength is minimal electron return effects. The main disadvantage of low-field strength is increased image noise compared to diagnostic MRIs conducted at 1.5 T or higher. The increased image noise affects both the discernibility of soft tissues and the accuracy of further image processing tasks for both clinical and research applications, such as tumor tracking, feature analysis, image segmentation, and image registration. An innovative method, adaptive anatomical preservation optimal denoising (AAPOD), was developed for optimal image denoising, i.e., to maximally reduce noise while preserving the tissue boundaries. AAPOD employs a series of adaptive nonlocal mean (ANLM) denoising trials with increasing denoising filter strength (i.e., the block similarity filtering parameter in the ANLM algorithm), and then detects the tissue boundary losses on the differences of sequentially denoised images using a zero-crossing edge detection method. The optimal denoising filter strength per voxel is determined by identifying the denoising filter strength value at which boundary losses start to appear around the voxel. The final denoising result is generated by applying the ANLM denoising method with the optimal per-voxel denoising filter strengths. The experimental results demonstrated that AAPOD was capable of reducing noise adaptively and optimally while avoiding tissue boundary losses. AAPOD is useful for improving the quality of MRIs with low-contrast-to-noise ratios and could be applied to other medical imaging modalities, e.g., computed tomography.

Entities:  

Keywords:  image guidance; image processing; image restoration; magnetic resonance imaging; medical imaging; noise reduction; radiation therapy

Year:  2017        PMID: 28894763      PMCID: PMC5580371          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.034004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  27 in total

1.  A versatile wavelet domain noise filtration technique for medical imaging.

Authors:  Aleksandra Pizurica; Wilfried Philips; Ignace Lemahieu; Marc Acheroy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.

Authors:  Zhou Wang; Alan Conrad Bovik; Hamid Rahim Sheikh; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  Image quality assessment based on local variance.

Authors:  Santiago Aja-Fernández; Raúl San José Estépar; Carlos Alberola-López; Carl-Fredrik Westin
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2006

4.  Nonlinear anisotropic filtering of MRI data.

Authors:  G Gerig; O Kubler; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Wavelet-based Rician noise removal for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R D Nowak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  P Coupe; P Yger; S Prima; P Hellier; C Kervrann; C Barillot
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  A treatment planning comparison between modulated tri-cobalt-60 teletherapy and linear accelerator-based stereotactic body radiotherapy for central early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Catherine Merna; Jean-Claude M Rwigema; Minsong Cao; Pin-Chieh Wang; Amar U Kishan; Argin Michailian; James Lamb; Ke Sheng; Nzhde Agazaryan; Daniel A Low; Patrick Kupelian; Michael L Steinberg; Percy Lee
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 1.482

8.  The ViewRay system: magnetic resonance-guided and controlled radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sasa Mutic; James F Dempsey
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  Longitudinal diffusion MRI for treatment response assessment: Preliminary experience using an MRI-guided tri-cobalt 60 radiotherapy system.

Authors:  Yingli Yang; Minsong Cao; Ke Sheng; Yu Gao; Allen Chen; Mitch Kamrava; Percy Lee; Nzhde Agazaryan; James Lamb; David Thomas; Daniel Low; Peng Hu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A dose homogeneity and conformity evaluation between ViewRay and pinnacle-based linear accelerator IMRT treatment plans.

Authors:  Daniel L Saenz; Bhudatt R Paliwal; John E Bayouth
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.