Literature DB >> 28894603

Are acute coronary syndromes an ideal scenario for bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation?

Elisabetta Moscarella1, Alfonso Ielasi2, Maria Carmen De Angelis1, Fortunato Scotto di Uccio3, Enrico Cerrato4, Roberta De Rosa1, Gianluca Campo5, Attilio Varricchio1.   

Abstract

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) represent the latest innovation in the field of interventional cardiology. BRS have recently been introduced in routine clinical practice and their use has progressively extended in everyday clinical practice. The BRS use appears theoretically attractive in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) as they are generally young with long life expectancy, thus possibly benefiting more of the so-called vascular reparative therapy. Furthermore, "culprit" lesions are usually softer and more easily expandable by current BRS compared to stable chronic lesions. However an increased risk of BRS thrombosis has been reported in clinical trials excluding ACS patients. Therefore, concerns have been raised on the safety of BRS implantation in the ACS setting in which the risk of thrombotic recurrences is definitely higher (compared to stable lesions) independently by the device implanted. Aim of this review is to provide an overview of the available data on the BRS performance in ACS patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute coronary syndrome (ACS); bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS); percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Year:  2017        PMID: 28894603      PMCID: PMC5583090          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  46 in total

1.  From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade?

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Yoshinobu Onuma
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

Authors:  Serban Puricel; Diego Arroyo; Noé Corpataux; Gérard Baeriswyl; Sonja Lehmann; Zacharenia Kallinikou; Olivier Muller; Ludovic Allard; Jean-Christophe Stauffer; Mario Togni; Jean-Jacques Goy; Stéphane Cook
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Everolimus- Versus Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: A Matched Comparison.

Authors:  Jens Wiebe; Oliver Dörr; Hanna Ilstad; Oliver Husser; Christoph Liebetrau; Niklas Boeder; Timm Bauer; Helge Möllmann; Adnan Kastrati; Christian W Hamm; Holger M Nef
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BVS EXAMINATION study): 2-Year results from a propensity score matched comparison.

Authors:  Salvatore Brugaletta; Tommaso Gori; Adrian F Low; Petr Tousek; Eduardo Pinar; Josep Gomez-Lara; Luis Ortega-Paz; Eberhard Schulz; Mark Y Chan; Viktor Kocka; Jose Hurtado; Joan Antoni Gomez-Hospital; Giuseppe Giacchi; Thomas Münzel; Chi-Hang Lee; Angel Cequier; Mariano Valdés; Petr Widimsky; Patrick W Serruys; Manel Sabaté
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Predilation, sizing and post-dilation scoring in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation for prediction of cardiac adverse events: development and internal validation of the PSP score.

Authors:  Luis Ortega-Paz; Davide Capodanno; Tommaso Gori; Holger Nef; Azeem Latib; Giuseppe Caramanno; Carlo Di Mario; Christoph Naber; Maciej Lesiak; Piera Capranzano; Jens Wiebe; Julinda Mehilli; Aleksander Araszkiewicz; Stelios Pyxaras; Alessio Mattesini; Salvatore Geraci; Toru Naganuma; Antonio Colombo; Thomas Münzel; Manel Sabaté; Corrado Tamburino; Salvatore Brugaletta
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 6.534

6.  Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for treatment of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: BVS STEMI first study.

Authors:  Roberto Diletti; Antonios Karanasos; Takashi Muramatsu; Shimpei Nakatani; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Yoshinobu Onuma; Sjoerd T Nauta; Yuki Ishibashi; Mattie J Lenzen; Jurgen Ligthart; Carl Schultz; Evelyn Regar; Peter P de Jaegere; Patrick W Serruys; Felix Zijlstra; Robert Jan van Geuns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Beyond the early stages: insights from the ASSURE registry on bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

Authors:  Jochen Wöhrle; Christoph Naber; Thomas Schmitz; Carsten Schwencke; Norbert Frey; Christian Butter; Johannes Brachmann; Maja Ingwersen; Anna Drabik; Sinisa Markovic; Detlef G Mathey
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.534

Review 8.  Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Salvatore Cassese; Robert A Byrne; Gjin Ndrepepa; Sebastian Kufner; Jens Wiebe; Janika Repp; Heribert Schunkert; Massimiliano Fusaro; Takeshi Kimura; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds following acute coronary syndrome is associated with reduced early neointimal growth and strut coverage.

Authors:  Joel P Giblett; Adam J Brown; Harry Keevil; Catherine Jaworski; Stephen P Hoole; Nick E J West
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 6.534

Review 10.  Acute coronary syndromes: diagnosis and management, part I.

Authors:  Amit Kumar; Christopher P Cannon
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Influences of Stent Design on In-Stent Restenosis and Major Cardiac Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Omer Burak Istanbullu; Gulsen Akdogan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.495

2.  Mid-term outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds vs second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junsong Ke; Hongyu Zhang; Jun Huang; Ping Lv; Jumei Yan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.