| Literature DB >> 28894262 |
C A Maestri1, M Abrami2, S Hazan3, E Chistè1, Y Golan3,4, J Rohrer5, A Bernkop-Schnürch5, M Grassi2, M Scarpa1, P Bettotti6.
Abstract
Sol-gel transition of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals has been investigated using rheology, SAXS, NMR and optical spectroscopies to unveil the distinctive roles of ultrasound treatments and addition of various cations. Besides cellulose fiber fragmentation, sonication treatment induces fast gelling of the solution. The gelation is independent of the addition of cations, while the final rheological properties are highly influenced by the type, concentration and sequence of the operations since the cations must be added prior to sonication to produce stiff gels. The gel elastic modulus was found to increase proportionally to the ionic charge rather than the cationic size. In cases where ions were added after sonication, SAXS analysis of the Na+ hydrogel and Ca2+ hydrogel indicated the presence of structurally ordered domains in which water is confined, and 1H-NMR investigation showed the dynamics of water exchange within the hydrogels. Conversely, separated phases containing essentially free water were characteristic of the hydrogels obtained by sonication after Ca2+ addition, confirming that this ion induces irreversible fiber aggregation. The rheological properties of the hydrogels depend on the duration of the ultrasound treatments, enabling the design of programmed materials with tailored energy dissipation response.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28894262 PMCID: PMC5593908 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11649-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Transmittance of TOCs vs. sonication time. Square orange points refer to UV wavelength (300 nm), while blue round points indicate visible (500 nm) wavelength. (b) Evolution of both elastic modulus (filled circles, left axis) and of relaxation rates (open symbols, right axis). Arrows are guides for the eyes. The shaded region underlines the sonication times during which gel structure forms.
Figure 2(a) Storage modulus measured @ 1 Hz for gels formed using 100 mM of different cations versus sonication time. Lines are guides for the eyes. (b) G′ vs the ratio of cation valence over cation radius for samples sonicated 240 s. The red line is the linear fit of the data.
Water relaxation rates for pristine gels and for gels added with mono- and bi-valent salts.
| Salt |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| NaCl(a) | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.88 ± 0.13 |
| CaCl2 (b) | 0.59 ± 0.06 | 1.13 ± 0.06 |
| No Salt | 0.69 ± 0.03 | — |
(a,b)100 mM salt was added to suspensions of 6 mgmL−1 TOCs sonicated for 240 s.
Figure 3Amplitudes (A22) of the water magnetization components relaxing with T22 time, plotted for NaCl (squares), CaCl2 (circles) and solution without added salts (triangles).
Figure 4SAXS profile of sonicated TOCs suspensions after salt addition. Suspensions of 6 mgmL−1 TOCs have been sonicated for 240 s then 100 mM NaCl (a), CaCl2 (b) and AlCl3 (c) were added. The dots are the experimental points, the red line is the fit of the experimental points with the Gauss-Lorentz Gel Model (see Eq. 1 in Section “Methods”).
Static and dynamic correlation lengths of TOCs hydrogels formed by the addition of different salts (100 mM) after 240 s sonication.
| Salt (100 mM) | Static length (Å) | Dynamic length (Å) | Mesh size (Å)(d) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NaCl | 416 ± 144(c) | 77 ± 7(c) | 250 |
| CaCl2 | 474 ± 28(a) | 127 ± 11(a) | 150 |
| AlCl3 | 469 ± 51(b) | 106 ± 13(b) | 100 |
(a)average and standard deviation (s.d.) of 3 different samples; (b)average and s.d. of 5 different samples; (average and s.d. of 4 different samples; (d)values estimated assuming Flory theory.
Figure 5Frequency sweep tests of TOCs gels created adding different cations and concentrations to suspensions of 6 mgmL−1 TOCs sonicated for 240 s. (a) Elastic moduli; (b) viscous moduli.
Figure 6(a) Variation of G′ (conventionally evaluated at 1 Hz) vs sonication treatment for different cations (the data are the same reported in Fig. 2). (b) Plot of the slope of G′(1 Hz) variation versus cation valence.