| Literature DB >> 28893210 |
Yang An1,2, Shuzhen Wang1,2, Songlin Li1,3, Lulu Zhang1,3, Dayong Wang4, Haojie Wang1,2, Shibai Zhu5, Wan Zhu6, Yongqiang Li1,2, Wenwu Chen3, Shaoping Ji7,8, Xiangqian Guo9,10,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is an aggressive form of soft tissue tumors. The molecular heterogeneity and pathogenesis of ULMS are not well understood.Entities:
Keywords: Gene expression pattern; Molecular signature; Molecular subtype; Subtype-specific treatment; Uterine leiomyosarcoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28893210 PMCID: PMC5594508 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3568-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Identification of two distinct molecular subtypes of ULMS. a Consensus clustering reveals two distinct molecular subtypes of ULMS. Each column corresponds to a case of ULMS. b Silhouette analysis validates the subtype assignments from consensus clustering
Clinicopathologic characteristics (N = 29)
| patients, | Subtype I | Subtype II |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | ||||
| Mean | 56 | 54 | 60 | |
| Range | 35–73 | 35–73 | 41–71 | |
| Race | ||||
| White | 20 | 14 | 6 | |
| Black or African American | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
| Asian | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Unknown | 4 | 3 | 1 | |
| Tumor weight | 0.4 | |||
| Mean | 341.83 | 303.8 | 426.33 | |
| Range | 55–1100 | 58–1100 | 55–1077 | |
| Treatment best response | 0.04 | |||
| Complete Response | 8(27%) | 6 | 2 | |
| Partial Response | 2(7%) | 0 | 2 | |
| Clinical Progressive Disease | 4(14%) | 4 | 0 | |
| Unknown | 15(52%) | 10 | 5 | |
| Metastatic disease confirmed | 0.18 | |||
| YES | 10 (34%) | 5 | 5 | |
| NO | 11 (38%) | 9 | 2 | |
| Unknown | 8 (28%) | 6 | 2 | |
| Contiguous organ invaded | 0.24 | |||
| YES | 4(14%) | 2 | 2 | |
| NO | 8 (28%) | 7 | 1 | |
| Unknown | 17 (58%) | 11 | 6 | |
| Necrosis percent | 0.52 | |||
| Mean | 20.33 | 23.5 | 14 | |
| Range | 0–50 | 1–50 | 0–33 | |
* p < 0.05
Fig. 2Different gene sets enriched in distinct molecular subtypes. a The summary of GSEA results. b and c The gene sets enriched in subtype I and subtype II, respectively. Permutation = 1000, p < 0.05
Fig. 3Different gene expression signatures enriched in distinct molecular subtypes. Subtype I and subtype II ULMSs have different gene expression signatures revealed by GSEA. Each row denotes a gene and each column corresponds to a case of ULMS. Red, over-expressed genes; Blue, down-expressed genes
Pathways enriched in each molecular subtype
| Pathways |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Subtype I | Vascular smooth muscle contraction | 7.2E-08 |
| Focal adhesion | 0.00021 | |
| Calcium signaling pathway | 0.00497 | |
| Regulation of actin cytoskeleton | 0.00702 | |
| Subtype II | Ribosome | 1.7E-05 |
| Hedgehog signaling pathway | 1.28E-02 | |
| Pathways in cancer | 0.02433 | |
| TGF-beta signaling pathway | 0.03385 |
Fig. 4Immunohistochemistry staining of ULMS subtype specific biomarkers. a Representative staining of LMOD1 and ARL4C for a subtype I ULMS case (case # pt69) and a subtype II ULMS case (case # pt103). b Heatmap of LMOD1 and ARL4C IHC staining results on 68 ULMS cases. Bright-red and dull-red represent strong and weak staining, while green and black indicated negative and equivocal staining