Literature DB >> 28892431

Nintedanib Plus Pemetrexed/Cisplatin in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Phase II Results From the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled LUME-Meso Trial.

Federica Grosso1, Nicola Steele1, Silvia Novello1, Anna K Nowak1, Sanjay Popat1, Laurent Greillier1, Thomas John1, Natasha B Leighl1, Martin Reck1, Paul Taylor1, David Planchard1, Jens Benn Sørensen1, Mark A Socinski1, Ute von Wangenheim1, Arsène Bienvenu Loembé1, José Barrueco1, Nassim Morsli1, Giorgio Scagliotti1.   

Abstract

Purpose LUME-Meso is a phase II/III randomized, double-blind trial designed to assess efficacy and safety of nintedanib plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Phase II results are reported here. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients with unresectable, nonsarcomatoid MPM (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1), stratified by histology (epithelioid or biphasic), were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to up to six cycles of pemetrexed and cisplatin plus nintedanib (200 mg twice daily) or placebo followed by nintedanib plus placebo monotherapy until progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned. The median number of pemetrexed and cisplatin cycles was six; the median treatment duration for nintedanib was 7.8 months and 5.3 months for placebo. Primary PFS favored nintedanib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.91; P = .017), which was confirmed in updated PFS analyses (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.87; P = .010). A trend toward improved overall survival also favored nintedanib (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.29; P = .319). Benefit was evident in epithelioid histology, with a median overall survival gain of 5.4 months (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.21; P = .197; median [nintedanib v placebo], 20.6 months v 15.2 months) and median PFS gain of 4.0 months (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.82; P = .006; median [nintedanib v placebo], 9.7 v 5.7 months). Neutropenia was the most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse event (AE; nintedanib 43.2% v placebo 12.2%); rates of febrile neutropenia were low (4.5% in nintedanib group v 0% in placebo group). AEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 6.8% of those receiving nintedanib versus 17.1% of those in the placebo group. Conclusion Addition of nintedanib to pemetrexed plus cisplatin resulted in PFS improvement. AEs were manageable. The clinical benefit was evident in patients with epithelioid histology. The confirmatory phase III part of the study is ongoing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28892431     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.9012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  40 in total

1.  A Phase II Study of Pazopanib in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: NCCTG N0623 (Alliance).

Authors:  Kaushal Parikh; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Katie Allen-Ziegler; Brandt Esplin; Angelina D Tan; Benjamin Marchello; Alex A Adjei; Julian R Molina
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-24

2.  Biomarkers in malignant pleural mesothelioma: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Tamkin Ahmadzada; Glen Reid; Steven Kao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Review of nintedanib plus pemetrexed/cisplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: phase II results from the randomized, placebo-controlled LUME-Meso trial.

Authors:  Pyng Lee
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: main topics of American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Malgorzata Szolkowska; Katarzyna Blasinska-Przerwa; Magdalena Knetki-Wroblewska; Piotr Rudzinski; Renata Langfort
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Is Pleurectomy/Decortication Superior to Extrapleural Pneumonectomy for Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma? A Single-Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Takuro Miyazaki; Naoya Yamasaki; Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Keitaro Matsumoto; Ryotaro Kamohara; Go Hatachi; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 6.  Medical treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma relapses.

Authors:  Iacopo Petrini; Maurizio Lucchesi; Gianfranco Puppo; Antonio Chella
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  A randomized phase II study of pleurectomy/decortication preceded or followed by (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early stage malignant pleural mesothelioma (EORTC 1205).

Authors:  Jo Raskin; Veerle Surmont; Robin Cornelissen; Paul Baas; Paul E Y van Schil; Jan P van Meerbeeck
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10

Review 8.  Progress in the Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in 2017.

Authors:  Amanda J McCambridge; Andrea Napolitano; Aaron S Mansfield; Dean A Fennell; Yoshitaka Sekido; Anna K Nowak; Thanyanan Reungwetwattana; Weimin Mao; Harvey I Pass; Michele Carbone; Haining Yang; Tobias Peikert
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 9.  Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  Glenn Broeckx; Patrick Pauwels
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10

Review 10.  Current chemotherapy strategies in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Cornedine Jannette de Gooijer; Paul Baas; Jacobus Adrianus Burgers
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.