Literature DB >> 28891788

Week 48 resistance analysis of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF versus Atazanavir + Ritonavir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir DF in HIV-1 infected women (WAVES study GS-US-236-0128).

Rima Kulkarni1, Sally L Hodder2, Huyen Cao3, Silvia Chang1, Michael D Miller1, Kirsten L White1.   

Abstract

Background Women and those with non-B subtype HIV-1 are typically underrepresented in clinical trials. WAVES (GS-US-236-0128) was a double-blind phase 3b study among treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected women that demonstrated that elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF; N = 289) was superior to atazanavir + ritonavir + FTC/TDF (ATV + RTV + FTC/TDF; N = 286) for HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL by FDA snapshot analysis at week 48. Here, we describe resistance development through week 48 in women with virologic failure and determine the impact of pre-existing mutations and HIV-1 subtype on viral suppression. Methods Genotypic analyses (population and deep sequencing) and phenotypic analyses of HIV-1 protease, reverse transcriptase (RT), and integrase (IN) were performed. The resistance analysis population (participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at confirmed virologic failure, at discontinuation ≥ week 8, or at week 48) had genotypic and phenotypic analyses at failure and baseline. Results The proportion of women qualifying for resistance analyses was similar between treatment groups (6.2% EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF; 7.3% ATV + RTV + FTC/TDF). Emergent resistance was rare (0% EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF; 1% ATV + RTV + FTC/TDF - 3 with M184V/I in RT). Deep sequencing of HIV-1 did not detect additional resistance development. Pre-existing mutations did not lead to virologic failure; most with the polymorphic primary IN substitution T97A (92%), or with substitutions in RT (i.e. A62V, V90I, K103N, or E138A/G/K/Q; 68-82%) demonstrated virologic suppression at week 48, with no resistance development except for one patient with M184V and pre-existing K103N in the ATV + RTV + FTC/TDF group. Most participants (74%) had non-B HIV-1, and subtype did not affect outcome. Conclusions Emergent resistance to study drugs was rare in this study of women, with no resistance observed among EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF-treated participants, despite a high proportion of participants with natural or transmitted viral mutations and non-B HIV-1 subtypes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV-1; cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; resistance; tenofovir; women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28891788      PMCID: PMC5942200          DOI: 10.1080/15284336.2017.1370059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HIV Clin Trials        ISSN: 1528-4336


  14 in total

1.  Better mind the gap: addressing the shortage of HIV-positive women in clinical trials.

Authors:  Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Lorena González; Annette Haberl; Lorraine Sherr; Winnie Ssanyu-Sseruma; Sharon L Walmsley
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  HIV-1 integrase sequence variability in antiretroviral naïve patients and in triple-class experienced patients subsequently treated with raltegravir.

Authors:  Vici Varghese; Tommy F Liu; Soo-Yon Rhee; Paolo Libiran; Christina Trevino; W Jeffrey Fessel; Robert W Shafer
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.205

3.  Women in clinical trials: an FDA perspective.

Authors:  L A Sherman; R Temple; R B Merkatz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  A systematic review of the use of atazanavir in women infected with HIV-1.

Authors:  Margaret Johnson; Sharon Walmsley; Annette Haberl
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2014-01-31

5.  Effect of gender and race on the week 48 findings in treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected patients enrolled in the randomized, phase III trials ECHO and THRIVE.

Authors:  S Hodder; K Arasteh; J De Wet; J Gathe; J Gold; P Kumar; L Mohapi; W Short; H Crauwels; S Vanveggel; K Boven
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.180

6.  Sex-based outcomes of darunavir-ritonavir therapy: a single-group trial.

Authors:  Judith Currier; Dawn Averitt Bridge; Debbie Hagins; Carmen D Zorrilla; Judith Feinberg; Robert Ryan; Ron Falcon; Alan Tennenberg; Joseph Mrus; Kathleen Squires
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and toxicity of antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Obiamiwe C Umeh; Judith S Currier
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.481

8.  Integrase inhibitor versus protease inhibitor based regimen for HIV-1 infected women (WAVES): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study.

Authors:  Kathleen Squires; Cissy Kityo; Sally Hodder; Margaret Johnson; Evgeny Voronin; Debbie Hagins; Anchalee Avihingsanon; Ellen Koenig; Shuping Jiang; Kirsten White; Andrew Cheng; Javier Szwarcberg; Huyen Cao
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 12.767

9.  Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Edwin DeJesus; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Keith Henry; Jean-Michel Molina; Joseph Gathe; Srinivasan Ramanathan; Xuelian Wei; Kitty Yale; Javier Szwarcberg; Kirsten White; Andrew K Cheng; Brian P Kearney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The A62V and S68G mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase partially restore the replication defect associated with the K65R mutation.

Authors:  Evguenia S Svarovskaia; Joy Y Feng; Nicolas A Margot; Florence Myrick; Derrick Goodman; John K Ly; Kirsten L White; Nilima Kutty; Ruth Wang; Katyna Borroto-Esoda; Michael D Miller
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.