BACKGROUND: Women account for an increasing proportion of patients with HIV-1 but remain underrepresented in antiretroviral clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sex-based differences in efficacy and adverse events in treatment-experienced, HIV-positive women and men receiving darunavir-ritonavir therapy over 48 weeks. DESIGN: Multicenter, open-label, phase 3b study designed to enroll a high proportion of women, with sample size determined on the basis of a noninferiority design with a maximum allowable difference of 15% in virologic response favoring men. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00381303) SETTING: 65 sites in the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada. PATIENTS: 287 women and 142 men. INTERVENTION: Patients received darunavir-ritonavir, 600/100 mg twice daily, plus an investigator-selected optimized background regimen. MEASUREMENTS: Virologic response (HIV RNA <50 copies/mL using a time-to-loss of virologic response [TLOVR] algorithm) and adverse events were assessed over 48 weeks. RESULTS: 67% of patients were women; 84% of patients were black or Hispanic. A higher proportion of women discontinued treatment than men (32.8% vs. 23.2%; P = 0.042); more women than men discontinued treatment for reasons other than virologic failure. Response rates in women and men at week 48 were 50.9% and 58.5%, respectively (intention-to-treat TLOVR), and 73.0% and 73.5%, respectively (TLOVR censored for patients who withdrew for reasons other than virologic failure). The absolute difference in response, based on logistic regression and adjusted for baseline log(10) viral load and CD4(+) cell count, was -9.6 percentage points (95% CI, -19.9 to 0.7 percentage points; P = 0.067) for intention-to-treat TLOVR and -3.9 percentage points (CI, -13.9 to 6.0 percentage points; P = 0.438) for TLOVR population that censored patients who withdrew for reasons other than virologic failure. Adverse events were similar between the sexes. The most common grade 2 to 4 adverse events that were considered at least possibly treatment related in women and men were nausea (5.2% and 2.8%, respectively), diarrhea (4.5% and 4.9%, respectively), and rash (2.1% and 2.8%, respectively). LIMITATION: Baseline characteristics differed between sexes. CONCLUSION: Nonsignificant, sex-based differences in response were found during the 48-week study; however, these differences were probably due to higher discontinuation rates in women, suggesting that additional efforts are needed to retain women in clinical trials.
BACKGROUND:Women account for an increasing proportion of patients with HIV-1 but remain underrepresented in antiretroviral clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sex-based differences in efficacy and adverse events in treatment-experienced, HIV-positive women and men receiving darunavir-ritonavir therapy over 48 weeks. DESIGN: Multicenter, open-label, phase 3b study designed to enroll a high proportion of women, with sample size determined on the basis of a noninferiority design with a maximum allowable difference of 15% in virologic response favoring men. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00381303) SETTING: 65 sites in the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada. PATIENTS: 287 women and 142 men. INTERVENTION: Patients received darunavir-ritonavir, 600/100 mg twice daily, plus an investigator-selected optimized background regimen. MEASUREMENTS: Virologic response (HIV RNA <50 copies/mL using a time-to-loss of virologic response [TLOVR] algorithm) and adverse events were assessed over 48 weeks. RESULTS: 67% of patients were women; 84% of patients were black or Hispanic. A higher proportion of women discontinued treatment than men (32.8% vs. 23.2%; P = 0.042); more women than men discontinued treatment for reasons other than virologic failure. Response rates in women and men at week 48 were 50.9% and 58.5%, respectively (intention-to-treat TLOVR), and 73.0% and 73.5%, respectively (TLOVR censored for patients who withdrew for reasons other than virologic failure). The absolute difference in response, based on logistic regression and adjusted for baseline log(10) viral load and CD4(+) cell count, was -9.6 percentage points (95% CI, -19.9 to 0.7 percentage points; P = 0.067) for intention-to-treat TLOVR and -3.9 percentage points (CI, -13.9 to 6.0 percentage points; P = 0.438) for TLOVR population that censored patients who withdrew for reasons other than virologic failure. Adverse events were similar between the sexes. The most common grade 2 to 4 adverse events that were considered at least possibly treatment related in women and men were nausea (5.2% and 2.8%, respectively), diarrhea (4.5% and 4.9%, respectively), and rash (2.1% and 2.8%, respectively). LIMITATION: Baseline characteristics differed between sexes. CONCLUSION: Nonsignificant, sex-based differences in response were found during the 48-week study; however, these differences were probably due to higher discontinuation rates in women, suggesting that additional efforts are needed to retain women in clinical trials.
Authors: Chiara Melloni; Jeffrey S Berger; Tracy Y Wang; Funda Gunes; Amanda Stebbins; Karen S Pieper; Rowena J Dolor; Pamela S Douglas; Daniel B Mark; L Kristin Newby Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2010-02-16
Authors: Peter W Hunt; Steven G Deeks; Benigno Rodriguez; Hernan Valdez; Starley B Shade; Donald I Abrams; Mari M Kitahata; Melissa Krone; Torsten B Neilands; Richard J Brand; Michael M Lederman; Jeffrey N Martin Journal: AIDS Date: 2003-09-05 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Joseph Gathe; Barbara A da Silva; Daniel E Cohen; Mona R Loutfy; Daniel Podzamczer; Rafael Rubio; Sara Gibbs; Theresa Marsh; Christian Naylor; Linda Fredrick; Barry Bernstein Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Maria Pisu; Anastasiya Dumcheva; Andrew O Westfall; J Michael Kilby; Michael S Saag Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: José Valdez Madruga; Daniel Berger; Marilyn McMurchie; Fredy Suter; Denes Banhegyi; Kiat Ruxrungtham; Dorece Norris; Eric Lefebvre; Marie-Pierre de Béthune; Frank Tomaka; Martine De Pauw; Tony Vangeneugden; Sabrina Spinosa-Guzman Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-07-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Cynthia Firnhaber; Laura M Smeaton; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Umesh Lalloo; Sharla Faesen; Wadzanai Samaneka; Rosa Infante; Aadia Rana; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; James Hakim; Thomas B Campbell Journal: HIV Clin Trials Date: 2015-05-15
Authors: Laura M Smeaton; Deborah Kacanek; Kateryna Mykhalchenko; Kristine Coughlin; Karin L Klingman; Susan L Koletar; Elizabeth Barr; Ann C Collier Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-08-22 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Judith S Currier; Claudia Martorell; Olayemi Osiyemi; Michael T Yin; Robert Ryan; Guy De La Rosa; Joseph Mrus Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Kathleen E Squires; Sally L Hodder; Judith Feinberg; Dawn Averitt Bridge; Staats Abrams; Stephen P Storfer; Judith A Aberg Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Kathleen Squires; Judith Feinberg; Dawn Averitt Bridge; Judith Currier; Robert Ryan; Setareh Seyedkazemi; Yaswant K Dayaram; Joseph Mrus Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Kathleen E Squires; Linda-Gail Bekker; Joseph J Eron; Benjamin Cheng; Juergen K Rockstroh; Farid Marquez; Princy Kumar; Melanie Thompson; Rafael E Campo; Karam Mounzer; Kim M Strohmaier; Chengxing Lu; Anthony Rodgers; Beth E Jackson; Larissa A Wenning; Michael Robertson; Bach-Yen T Nguyen; Peter Sklar Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 2.205