Literature DB >> 28891017

Re-Appraisal of Estrogen Receptor Negative/Progesterone Receptor Positive (ER-/PR+) Breast Cancer Phenotype: True Subtype or Technical Artefact?

Niamh M Foley1, J M Coll2, A J Lowery2, S O Hynes2, M J Kerin2, M Sheehan2, C Brodie2, K J Sweeney2.   

Abstract

Expression of the ER and PR receptors is routinely quantified in breast cancer as a predictive marker of response to hormonal therapy. Accurate determination of ER and PR status is critical to the optimal selection of patients for targeted therapy. The existence of an ER-/PR+ subtype is controversial, with debate centred on whether this represents a true phenotype or a technical artefact on immunohistochemistry (IHC). The aim of this study was to investigate the true incidence and clinico-pathological features of ER-/PR+ breast cancers in a tertiary referral symptomatic breast unit. Clinico-pathological data were collected on invasive breast cancers diagnosed between 1995 and 2005. IHC for ER and PR receptors was repeated on all cases which were ER-/PR+, with the same paraffin block used for the initial diagnostic testing. Concordance between the diagnostic and repeat IHC was determined using validated testing. Complete data, including ER and PR status were available for 697 patients diagnosed during the study period. On diagnostic IHC, the immunophenotype of the breast tumours was: ER+/PR+ in 396 (57%), ER-/PR- in 157 (23%), ER+/PR- in 88 (12%) and ER-/PR+ in 56 (8.6%) patients. On repeat IHC of 48/56 ER-/PR+ tumours 45.8% were ER+/PR+, 6% were ER+/PR- and 43.7% were ER-/PR- None of the cases were confirmed to be ER-/PR+. The ER-/PR+ phenotypic breast cancer is likely to be the result of technical artefact. Prompt reassessment of patients originally assigned to this subtype who re-present with symptoms should be considered to ensure appropriate clinical management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; Immunohistochemistry; Pathology; Receptors, estrogen; Receptors, progesterone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28891017     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-017-0304-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  23 in total

1.  Study of interlaboratory reliability and reproducibility of estrogen and progesterone receptor assays in Europe. Documentation of poor reliability and identification of insufficient microwave antigen retrieval time as a major contributory element of unreliable assays.

Authors:  A Rhodes; B Jasani; A J Balaton; D M Barnes; E Anderson; L G Bobrow; K D Miller
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Tissue preparation for immunocytochemistry.

Authors:  J H Williams; B L Mepham; D H Wright
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered: experience with 5,993 breast cancers.

Authors:  Mehrdad Nadji; Carmen Gomez-Fernandez; Parvin Ganjei-Azar; Azorides R Morales
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Minimum formalin fixation time for consistent estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining of invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Neal S Goldstein; Monica Ferkowicz; Eva Odish; Anju Mani; Farnaz Hastah
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Characterization of estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Tiansheng Shen; Margaret Brandwein-Gensler; Omar Hameed; Gene P Siegal; Shi Wei
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 7.  Current issues in ER and HER2 testing by IHC in breast cancer.

Authors:  Allen M Gown
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  The estrogen receptor negative-progesterone receptor positive breast carcinoma is a biological entity and not a technical artifact.

Authors:  Char Hong Ng; Nirmala Bhoo Pathy; Nur Aishah Taib; Kein Seong Mun; Anthony Rhodes; Cheng Har Yip
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

9.  Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; H C Pan; C Taylor; Y C Wang; M Dowsett; J Ingle; R Peto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa K Dunnwald; Mary Anne Rossing; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

1.  Circulating anti-Müllerian hormone and breast cancer risk: A study in ten prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Wenzhen Ge; Tess V Clendenen; Yelena Afanasyeva; Karen L Koenig; Claudia Agnoli; Louise A Brinton; Joanne F Dorgan; A Heather Eliassen; Roni T Falk; Göran Hallmans; Susan E Hankinson; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Timothy J Key; Vittorio Krogh; Hazel B Nichols; Dale P Sandler; Minouk J Schoemaker; Patrick M Sluss; Malin Sund; Anthony J Swerdlow; Kala Visvanathan; Mengling Liu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  ABC6 Consensus: Assessment by a Group of German Experts.

Authors:  Diana Lüftner; Peter A Fasching; Renate Haidinger; Nadia Harbeck; Christian Jackisch; Volkmar Müller; Eva Schumacher-Wulf; Christoph Thomssen; Michael Untch; Rachel Würstlein
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Prognostic Relevance of Estrogen Receptor Status in Circulating Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Endocrine Therapy.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Jinmei Zhou; Jinyi Xiao; Yuehua Wang; Hao Wang; Haoyuan Shi; Chunyan Yue; Fei Jia; Ping Li; Zhiyuan Hu; Yanlian Yang; Zefei Jiang; Tao Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  The impact of progesterone receptor negativity on oncological outcomes in oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  M G Davey; É J Ryan; P J Folan; N O'Halloran; M R Boland; M K Barry; K J Sweeney; C M Malone; R J McLaughlin; M J Kerin; A J Lowery
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-05-07

5.  Is oestrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive (ER-/PR+) a real pathological entity?

Authors:  Adedayo A Onitilo; Jessica Engel; Adedayo O Joseph; Ya-Huei Li
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-08-24

Review 6.  Oral Contraceptive Use and Breast Cancer Risk According to Molecular Subtypes Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies.

Authors:  Agnieszka Barańska; Joanna Dolar-Szczasny; Wiesław Kanadys; Wiktoria Kinik; Dorota Ceglarska; Urszula Religioni; Robert Rejdak
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Advanced Breast Cancer: AGO Recommendations 2022 - Focus on ABC6 Consensus.

Authors:  Michael Untch; Peter A Fasching; Renate Haidinger; Nadia Harbeck; Christian Jackisch; Diana Lüftner; Volkmar Müller; Eva Schumacher-Wulf; Rachel Würstlein; Christoph Thomssen
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.