Literature DB >> 22799290

The estrogen receptor negative-progesterone receptor positive breast carcinoma is a biological entity and not a technical artifact.

Char Hong Ng1, Nirmala Bhoo Pathy, Nur Aishah Taib, Kein Seong Mun, Anthony Rhodes, Cheng Har Yip.   

Abstract

The ER-/PR+ breast tumor may be the result of a false ER negative result. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in patient and tumor characteristics of the ER-/PR+ phenotype in an Asian setting. A total of 2629 breast cancer patients were categorized on the basis of their age, ethnicity, tumor hormonal receptor phenotype, grade and histological type. There were 1230 (46.8%) ER+/PR+, 306 (11.6%) ER+/PR-, 122 (4.6%) ER-/PR+ and 972 (37%) ER-/PR-. ER-/PR+ tumors were 2.5 times more likely to be younger than 50 years at diagnosis (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.72-3.67). Compared to ER+/PR+ tumors, the ER-/ PR+ phenotype was twice more likely to be associated with grade 3 tumors (OR:2.02; 95%CI: 1.00-4.10). In contrast, compared to ER-/PR- tumors, the ER-/PR+ phenotype was 90% less likely to be associated with a grade 3 tumor (OR: 0.12; 95%CI:0.05-0.26), and more likely to have invasive lobular than invasive ductal histology (OR: 3.66; 95%CI: 1.47-9.11). These results show that the ER-/PR+ phenotype occurs in a younger age group and is associated with intermediate histopathological characteristics compared to ER+/PR+ and ER-/PR- tumors. This may imply that it is a distinct entity and not a technical artifact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22799290     DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.4.1111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  7 in total

1.  St Gallen molecular subtypes in feline mammary carcinoma and paired metastases-disease progression and clinical implications from a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  M Soares; J Correia; M C Peleteiro; F Ferreira
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-20

2.  Higher miR-21 expression in invasive breast carcinomas is associated with positive estrogen and progesterone receptor status in patients from Serbia.

Authors:  Nina Petrović; Vesna Mandušić; Bogomir Dimitrijević; Jelena Roganović; Silvana Lukić; Lidija Todorović; Boban Stanojević
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Steroid hormone receptors as prognostic markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Maggie C Louie; Mary B Sevigny
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Re-Appraisal of Estrogen Receptor Negative/Progesterone Receptor Positive (ER-/PR+) Breast Cancer Phenotype: True Subtype or Technical Artefact?

Authors:  Niamh M Foley; J M Coll; A J Lowery; S O Hynes; M J Kerin; M Sheehan; C Brodie; K J Sweeney
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Outcomes of Estrogen Receptor Negative and Progesterone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Melissa Chan; Martin C Chang; Rosa González; Belinda Lategan; Elvira del Barco; Francisco Vera-Badillo; Paula Quesada; Robyn Goldstein; Ignacio Cruz; Alberto Ocana; Juan J Cruz; Eitan Amir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Molecular essence and endocrine responsiveness of estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive, and HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Ke-Da Yu; Yi-Zhou Jiang; Shuang Hao; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Breast Cancer Survival Defined by the ER/PR/HER2 Subtypes and a Surrogate Classification according to Tumor Grade and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers.

Authors:  Carol A Parise; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.