Guangyin Wu1,2, Vivek Verma1, Matthias F Haefner3, Sicong Li1, Chi Lin1. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology Henan Provincial People's Hospital (University of Zhengzhou People's Hospital), Zhengzhou 450000, China. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This is the first known report evaluating the feasibility of substituting oral contrast with water in efforts to delineate the duodenum for pancreatic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: From January 2015 to August 2016, 13 patients were simulated after ingestion of 8 ounces of water approximately 15-20 min prior to their simulation scan. We examined the feasibility of contouring the duodenum thereafter, and measured the duodenal volume as well as its variation. Comparison was made to 40 patients treated from January 2009 to February 2012 on a prospective trial who used oral contrast. Group comparisons were performed by the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The duodenum was identified in all 13 patients who used water instead of oral contrast without subjective difficulty. In this group, the median duodenal volume was 72.86 cm3 (range, 44.61-130.90 cm3). In the oral contrast group, median duodenal volume was 86.21 cm3 (range, 50.11-157.89 cm3) There were no significant differences between groups (P=0.115). The approach was reproducible, as all patients were able to drink the same amount of water 15-20 min prior to each SBRT fraction to keep duodenal volumes subjectively similar to volumes on the simulation CT scan. CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach is effective and reproducible in delineating the duodenum for treatment planning and daily setup.
BACKGROUND: This is the first known report evaluating the feasibility of substituting oral contrast with water in efforts to delineate the duodenum for pancreatic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: From January 2015 to August 2016, 13 patients were simulated after ingestion of 8 ounces of water approximately 15-20 min prior to their simulation scan. We examined the feasibility of contouring the duodenum thereafter, and measured the duodenal volume as well as its variation. Comparison was made to 40 patients treated from January 2009 to February 2012 on a prospective trial who used oral contrast. Group comparisons were performed by the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The duodenum was identified in all 13 patients who used water instead of oral contrast without subjective difficulty. In this group, the median duodenal volume was 72.86 cm3 (range, 44.61-130.90 cm3). In the oral contrast group, median duodenal volume was 86.21 cm3 (range, 50.11-157.89 cm3) There were no significant differences between groups (P=0.115). The approach was reproducible, as all patients were able to drink the same amount of water 15-20 min prior to each SBRT fraction to keep duodenal volumes subjectively similar to volumes on the simulation CT scan. CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach is effective and reproducible in delineating the duodenum for treatment planning and daily setup.
Authors: Vivek Verma; Audrey J Lazenby; Dandan Zheng; Abhijeet R Bhirud; Quan P Ly; Chandrakanth Are; Aaron R Sasson; Chi Lin Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Yongbao Li; Jeremy D P Hoisak; Nan Li; Carrie Jiang; Zhen Tian; Quentin Gautier; Masoud Zarepisheh; Zhaoxia Wu; Yaqiang Liu; Xun Jia; Jona Hattangadi-Gluth; Loren K Mell; Steve Jiang; James D Murphy Journal: Med Dosim Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 1.482
Authors: Florence Huguet; Karyn A Goodman; David Azria; Severine Racadot; Ross A Abrams Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Devin Schellenberg; Jeff Kim; Claudia Christman-Skieller; Carlene L Chun; Laurie Ann Columbo; James M Ford; George A Fisher; Pamela L Kunz; Jacques Van Dam; Andrew Quon; Terry S Desser; Jeffrey Norton; Annie Hsu; Peter G Maxim; Lei Xing; Karyn A Goodman; Daniel T Chang; Albert C Koong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel T Chang; Devin Schellenberg; John Shen; Jeff Kim; Karyn A Goodman; George A Fisher; James M Ford; Terry Desser; Andrew Quon; Albert C Koong Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michael D Chuong; Gregory M Springett; Jessica M Freilich; Catherine K Park; Jill M Weber; Eric A Mellon; Pamela J Hodul; Mokenge P Malafa; Kenneth L Meredith; Sarah E Hoffe; Ravi Shridhar Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Carolyn H Kim; Diane C Ling; Rodney E Wegner; John C Flickinger; Dwight E Heron; Herbert Zeh; Arthur J Moser; Steven A Burton Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 3.481