Andrew Kennedy1, Michael Cohn2, Douglas M Coldwell3, Alain Drooz4, Eduardo Ehrenwald5, Adeel Kaiser6, Charles W Nutting7, Steven C Rose8, Eric A Wang9, Michael A Savin10. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA. 2. Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, FL, USA. 3. James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. 4. Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Fairfax, VA, USA. 5. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 6. University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. 7. Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, CO, USA. 8. University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA. 9. Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA. 10. Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases Outcomes after RadioEmbolization (MORE) study was a retrospective analysis of 606 patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated with radioembolization (RE) using 90Y-labeled resin microspheres. The first analysis of this study was completed with a last patient follow-up of 77.7 months. We now provide an updated survival analysis through September 15, 2016, with a last patient follow-up of 125 months. METHODS: 90Y-RE was considered for patients with advanced liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer which was deemed not suitable for surgery, ablation, or systemic therapy, and which had progressed or become refractory to at least one line of systemic therapy. All patients with a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer who had received at least 1 RE treatment and 1 follow-up visit were included in the analysis. Patients were treated between July 2002 and December 2011 at one of 11 U.S. tertiary care centers. Data were collected at baseline, on the day of the first 90Y-RE treatment (day 0), and at all subsequent visits or until death. Patient medical charts and/or public records were accessed to obtain dates of death. RESULTS: Dates of death were obtained for 574 out of a total of 606 patients, and overall survival (OS) data analyzed. Updated median OS was 10.0 months (95% CI: 9.2-11.8 months) at a median follow-up of 9.5 months versus the originally reported median OS of 9.6 months (95% CI: 9.0-11.1 months) at a follow-up of 8.6 months in the first MORE analysis. Patients received a median (range) of 2 (0 to 6) lines of chemotherapy. Baseline characteristics and factors significantly associated with patient survival (P<0.01) are consistent with those reported in the first safety analysis of the MORE study. These factors include poor ECOG performance status, markers of advanced disease such as increased extent of tumor-to-target liver involvement, poor baseline liver function, pre-treatment anemia, lung shunt fraction, and number of lines of prior chemotherapy. Patient age did not significantly affect survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up confirms that 90Y-RE treatment offers favorable survival benefits for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, even among patients who received 3 or more prior lines of chemotherapy. Our analysis also supports earlier reported prognostic factors for survival after 90Y-RE. Overall, our updated analysis confirms that 90Y-RE treatment provided a meaningful response and survival advantage for MORE patients across all ages and across diverse community and academic centers in the U.S.
BACKGROUND: The Metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases Outcomes after RadioEmbolization (MORE) study was a retrospective analysis of 606 patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated with radioembolization (RE) using 90Y-labeled resin microspheres. The first analysis of this study was completed with a last patient follow-up of 77.7 months. We now provide an updated survival analysis through September 15, 2016, with a last patient follow-up of 125 months. METHODS: 90Y-RE was considered for patients with advanced liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer which was deemed not suitable for surgery, ablation, or systemic therapy, and which had progressed or become refractory to at least one line of systemic therapy. All patients with a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer who had received at least 1 RE treatment and 1 follow-up visit were included in the analysis. Patients were treated between July 2002 and December 2011 at one of 11 U.S. tertiary care centers. Data were collected at baseline, on the day of the first 90Y-RE treatment (day 0), and at all subsequent visits or until death. Patient medical charts and/or public records were accessed to obtain dates of death. RESULTS: Dates of death were obtained for 574 out of a total of 606 patients, and overall survival (OS) data analyzed. Updated median OS was 10.0 months (95% CI: 9.2-11.8 months) at a median follow-up of 9.5 months versus the originally reported median OS of 9.6 months (95% CI: 9.0-11.1 months) at a follow-up of 8.6 months in the first MORE analysis. Patients received a median (range) of 2 (0 to 6) lines of chemotherapy. Baseline characteristics and factors significantly associated with patient survival (P<0.01) are consistent with those reported in the first safety analysis of the MORE study. These factors include poor ECOG performance status, markers of advanced disease such as increased extent of tumor-to-target liver involvement, poor baseline liver function, pre-treatment anemia, lung shunt fraction, and number of lines of prior chemotherapy. Patient age did not significantly affect survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up confirms that 90Y-RE treatment offers favorable survival benefits for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, even among patients who received 3 or more prior lines of chemotherapy. Our analysis also supports earlier reported prognostic factors for survival after 90Y-RE. Overall, our updated analysis confirms that 90Y-RE treatment provided a meaningful response and survival advantage for MORE patients across all ages and across diverse community and academic centers in the U.S.
Authors: Mashaal Dhir; Heather L Jones; Yongli Shuai; Amber K Clifford; Samantha Perkins; Jennifer Steve; Melissa E Hogg; M Haroon A Choudry; James F Pingpank; Matthew P Holtzman; Herbert J Zeh; Nathan Bahary; David L Bartlett; Amer H Zureikat Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Andrew S Kennedy; David Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Steven C Rose; Charles W Nutting; Fred M Moeslein; Michael A Savin; Sabine Schirm; Samuel G Putnam; Navesh K Sharma; Eric A Wang Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2015-04
Authors: Robert J Mayer; Eric Van Cutsem; Alfredo Falcone; Takayuki Yoshino; Rocio Garcia-Carbonero; Nobuyuki Mizunuma; Kentaro Yamazaki; Yasuhiro Shimada; Josep Tabernero; Yoshito Komatsu; Alberto Sobrero; Eveline Boucher; Marc Peeters; Ben Tran; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Alberto Zaniboni; Howard Hochster; James M Cleary; Hans Prenen; Fabio Benedetti; Hirokazu Mizuguchi; Lukas Makris; Masanobu Ito; Atsushi Ohtsu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrew S Kennedy; David Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Edward Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Fred M Moeslein; Charles W Nutting; Samuel G Putnam; Steven C Rose; Michael Savin; Sabine Schirm; Navesh K Sharma; Eric Wang Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2017-02
Authors: Jaafar Bennouna; Javier Sastre; Dirk Arnold; Pia Österlund; Richard Greil; Eric Van Cutsem; Roger von Moos; Jose Maria Viéitez; Olivier Bouché; Christophe Borg; Claus-Christoph Steffens; Vicente Alonso-Orduña; Christoph Schlichting; Irmarie Reyes-Rivera; Belguendouz Bendahmane; Thierry André; Stefan Kubicka Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Guy Van Hazel; Anthony Blackwell; James Anderson; David Price; Paul Moroz; Geoff Bower; Giuseppe Cardaci; Bruce Gray Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Riad Salem; Kenneth G Thurston; Brian I Carr; James E Goin; Jean-Francois H Geschwind Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Ricky A Sharma; Guy A Van Hazel; Bruno Morgan; David P Berry; Keith Blanshard; David Price; Geoffrey Bower; Jennifer A Shannon; Peter Gibbs; William P Steward Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Axel Grothey; Eric Van Cutsem; Alberto Sobrero; Salvatore Siena; Alfredo Falcone; Marc Ychou; Yves Humblet; Olivier Bouché; Laurent Mineur; Carlo Barone; Antoine Adenis; Josep Tabernero; Takayuki Yoshino; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Frank Cihon; Lisa Cupit; Andrea Wagner; Dirk Laurent Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrew Kennedy; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Adeel Kaiser; Charles W Nutting; Steven C Rose; Eric A Wang; Michael A Savin Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2018-04
Authors: D Rohan Jeyarajah; Maria B Majella Doyle; N Joseph Espat; Paul D Hansen; David A Iannitti; Joseph Kim; Thavam Thambi-Pillai; Brendan C Visser Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2020-04
Authors: Giovanni Mauri; Lorenzo Monfardini; Andrea Garnero; Maria Giulia Zampino; Franco Orsi; Paolo Della Vigna; Guido Bonomo; Gianluca Maria Varano; Marco Busso; Carlo Gazzera; Paolo Fonio; Andrea Veltri; Marco Calandri Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Ricarda Seidensticker; Robert Damm; Julia Enge; Max Seidensticker; Konrad Mohnike; Maciej Pech; Peter Hass; Holger Amthauer; Jens Ricke Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Nikhil Chauhan; Mary F Mulcahy; Riad Salem; Al B Benson Iii; Eveline Boucher; Janet Bukovcan; David Cosgrove; Chantal Laframboise; Robert J Lewandowski; Fayaz Master; Bassel El-Rayes; Jonathan R Strosberg; Daniel Y Sze; Ricky A Sharma Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2019-01-17
Authors: Jack Martin; Angelica Petrillo; Elizabeth C Smyth; Nadeem Shaida; Samir Khwaja; H K Cheow; Adam Duckworth; Paula Heister; Raaj Praseedom; Asif Jah; Anita Balakrishnan; Simon Harper; Siong Liau; Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis; Emmanuel Huguet Journal: World J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-10-24