Literature DB >> 28890607

Determining geometric error model parameters of a terrestrial laser scanner through Two-face, Length-consistency, and Network methods.

Ling Wang1,2, Bala Muralikrishnan2, Prem Rachakonda2, Daniel Sawyer2.   

Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) are increasingly used in large-scale manufacturing and assembly where required measurement uncertainties are on the order of few tenths of a millimeter or smaller. In order to meet these stringent requirements, systematic errors within a TLS are compensated in-situ through self-calibration. In the Network method of self-calibration, numerous targets distributed in the work-volume are measured from multiple locations with the TLS to determine parameters of the TLS error model. In this paper, we propose two new self-calibration methods, the Two-face method and the Length-consistency method. The Length-consistency method is proposed as a more efficient way of realizing the Network method where the length between any pair of targets from multiple TLS positions are compared to determine TLS model parameters. The Two-face method is a two-step process. In the first step, many model parameters are determined directly from the difference between front-face and back-face measurements of targets distributed in the work volume. In the second step, all remaining model parameters are determined through the Length-consistency method. We compare the Two-face method, the Length-consistency method, and the Network method in terms of the uncertainties in the model parameters, and demonstrate the validity of our techniques using a calibrated scale bar and front-face back-face target measurements. The clear advantage of these self-calibration methods is that a reference instrument or calibrated artifacts are not required, thus significantly lowering the cost involved in the calibration process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geometric error model; Length-consistency method; Network method; Self-calibration; Terrestrial laser scanners; Two-face method; Uncertainty

Year:  2017        PMID: 28890607      PMCID: PMC5587141          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/aa6929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Meas Sci Technol        ISSN: 0957-0233            Impact factor:   2.046


  2 in total

1.  Trimble GX200 and Riegl LMS-Z390i sensor self-calibration.

Authors:  D González-Aguilera; P Rodríguez-Gonzálvez; J Armesto; P Arias
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Improvements to and comparison of static terrestrial LiDAR self-calibration methods.

Authors:  Jacky C K Chow; Derek D Lichti; Craig Glennie; Preston Hartzell
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Performance Evaluation of Terrestrial Laser Scanners - A Review.

Authors:  Bala Muralikrishnan
Journal:  Meas Sci Technol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.046

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.