Literature DB >> 28890356

Multicenter prevalence of anaphylaxis in clinic-based oral food challenges.

Kwei Akuete1, Danielle Guffey2, Ryan B Israelsen3, John M Broyles3, Lori Jo Higgins4, Todd D Green3, David R Naimi4, Andrew J MacGinnitie5, Girish Vitalpur6, Charles G Minard2, Carla M Davis7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although previous single-center studies report the rate of anaphylaxis for oral food challenges (OFCs) as 9% to 11%, little is known regarding the epidemiology of clinical OFCs across multiple centers in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the epidemiology, symptoms, and treatment of clinical low-risk OFCs in the nonresearch setting.
METHODS: Data were obtained from 2008 to 2013 through a physician survey in 5 food allergy centers geographically distributed across the United States. Allergic reaction rates and the association of reaction rates with year, hospital, and demographics were determined using a linear mixed model. Meta-analysis was used to pool the proportion of reactions and anaphylaxis with inverse-variance weights using a random-effects model with exact confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: A total of 6,377 OFCs were performed, and the pooled estimate of anaphylaxis was 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%). The rate of allergic reactions was 14% (95% CI, 13%-16%) and was consistent during the study period (P = .40). Reaction rates ranged from 13% to 33%. Males reacted 16% more frequently than females (95% CI, 4%-37.5%; P = .04). Foods challenged in 2013 varied geographically, with peanut as the most challenged food in the Northeast, Midwest, and West and egg as the most challenged in the South.
CONCLUSION: As the largest national survey of allergic reactions of clinical open OFCs in a nonresearch setting in the United States, this study found that performing clinical nonresearch open low-risk OFCs results in few allergic reactions, with 86% of challenges resulting in no reactions and 98% without anaphylaxis.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28890356     DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Manifestations of Pediatric Food Allergy: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Ling-Jen Wang; Shu-Chi Mu; Ming-I Lin; Tseng-Chen Sung; Bor-Luen Chiang; Cheng-Hui Lin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 2.  Innovation in Food Challenge Tests for Food Allergy.

Authors:  Amanda L Cox; Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Anaphylaxis in the 21st century: phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers.

Authors:  Teodorikez Wilfox Jimenez-Rodriguez; Marlene Garcia-Neuer; Leila A Alenazy; Mariana Castells
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 4.  Food allergy and anaphylaxis.

Authors:  David Yue; Amanda Ciccolini; Ernie Avilla; Susan Waserman
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2018-06-20

5.  Establishing Standardized Documentation for Anaphylaxis Treatment in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Allergy Clinic.

Authors:  Monica T Kraft; Rebecca Scherzer; Kasey Strothman; Gayla Rogers; Tricia Montgomery; Mitchell H Grayson
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-02-15

6.  Interdisciplinary Significance of Food-Related Adverse Reactions in Adulthood.

Authors:  Dóra Solymosi; Miklós Sárdy; Györgyi Pónyai
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  The effect of age, sex, race/ethnicity, health insurance, and food specific serum immunoglobulin E on outcomes of oral food challenges.

Authors:  Andrew T Dang; Pavan K Chundi; Nadeem A Mousa; Amanda I Beyer; Somboon Chansakulporn; Carina Venter; Tesfaye B Mersha; Amal H Assa'ad
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.084

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.