Literature DB >> 28890223

A new iPhone application for measuring active craniocervical range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain: a reliability and validity study.

Mohammad Reza Pourahmadi1, Rasool Bagheri2, Morteza Taghipour3, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani1, Javad Sarrafzadeh1, Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Measurement of cervical spine range of motion (ROM) is often considered to be an essential component of cervical spine physiotherapy assessment.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of an iPhone application (app) (Goniometer Pro) for measuring active craniocervical ROM (ACCROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the musculoskeletal biomechanics laboratory located at Iran University of Medical Sciences. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty non-specific neck pain patients participated in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measure was the ACCROM, including flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation.
METHOD: Following the recruitment process, ACCROM was measured using a universal goniometer (UG) and iPhone 7 app. Two blinded examiners each used the UG and iPhone to measure ACCROM in the following sequences: flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation. The second (2 hours later) and third (48 hours later) sessions were carried out in the same manner as the first session. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) models were used to determine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. The Pearson correlation coefficients were used to establish concurrent validity of the iPhone app. Minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) was also computed.
RESULTS: Good intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was demonstrated for the goniometer with ICC values of ≥0.66 and ≥0.70 and the iPhone app with ICC values of ≥0.62 and ≥0.65, respectively. The MDC95 ranged from 2.21° to 12.50° for the intra-rater analysis and from 3.40° to 12.61° for the inter-rater analysis. The concurrent validity between the two instruments was high, with r valuesof ≥0.63. The magnitude of the differences between the UG and iPhone app values (effect sizes) was small, with Cohen d values of ≤0.17.
CONCLUSIONS: The iPhone app possesses good reliability and high validity. It seems that this app can be used for measuring ACCROM.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthrometry, articular; Cervical vertebrae; Neck; Range of motion, articular; Reproducibility of results; Smartphone

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28890223     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  8 in total

1.  Effects of cervicothoracic postures on the stiffness of trapezius muscles.

Authors:  Hongying Liang; Suiqing Yu; Man Hao; Weixin Deng; Ming Lin; Zheng Zhang; Chunlong Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Modulation in Elastic Properties of Upper Trapezius with Varying Neck Angle.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Jiafeng Yu; Chunlong Liu; Chunzhi Tang; Zhijie Zhang
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 1.781

3.  Reliability and validity of clinically accessible smartphone applications to measure joint range of motion: A systematic review.

Authors:  Justin W L Keogh; Alistair Cox; Sarah Anderson; Bernard Liew; Alicia Olsen; Ben Schram; James Furness
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Smartphone Application with Virtual Reality Goggles for the Reliable and Valid Measurement of Active Craniocervical Range of Motion.

Authors:  Ke-Vin Chang; Wei-Ting Wu; Mei-Chu Chen; Yi-Chi Chiu; Der-Sheng Han; Chih-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-10

Review 5.  Management of nystagmus in children: a review of the literature and current practice in UK specialist services.

Authors:  J E Self; M J Dunn; J T Erichsen; I Gottlob; H J Griffiths; C Harris; H Lee; J Owen; J Sanders; F Shawkat; M Theodorou; J P Whittle
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Validity and reliability of Veloflex to measure active cervical range of motion in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Germán Cánovas-Ambit; José A García-Vidal; Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín; Aurelio Arenas Dalla-Vecchia; Mariana Sánchez-Barbadora; Francesc Medina-Mirapeix
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Measurement properties of smartphone applications for the measurement of neck range of motion: a systematic review and meta analyses.

Authors:  E Elgueta-Cancino; K Rice; D Abichandani; D Falla
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Smartphone Applications as a Suitable Alternative to CROM Device and Inclinometers in Assessing the Cervical Range of Motion in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain.

Authors:  Faezeh Ghorbani; Mojtaba Kamyab; Fatemeh Azadinia
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2020-09-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.