Literature DB >> 28889327

A linkage between flowering phenology and fruit-set success of alpine plant communities with reference to the seasonality and pollination effectiveness of bees and flies.

Yuki Mizunaga1, Gaku Kudo2.   

Abstract

To clarify the linkage between flowering phenology and pollination success in alpine plant communities, we quantified the seasonality of flower visitors, the temporal transition of floral resources, and the variation in pollination success of alpine plants in northern Japan. Bumble bees, syrphid flies, and non-syrphid flies were the predominant flower visitors. Foraging activity of bumble bees increased toward the late flowering period reflecting the life cycle of colony development. The activity of syrphid flies was sensitive to ambient temperature, while that of non-syrphid flies remained high throughout the season. Flower production of bee-pollinated plants fluctuated significantly between years with a bimodal pattern peaking in the early and late periods, while flower production of fly-pollinated plants was less variable between years. Fruit-set success of bee-pollinated plants increased considerably from the early to the late flowering period, while the trend for fly-pollinated plants was less marked. Three times more visits of dipteran insects are necessary for fly-pollinated plants to achieve fruiting success comparable to bee-pollinated plants. Bumble bees are potentially excellent pollinators, but the visitation frequency is low early in the season. Lower pollination ability of dipteran insects may be compensated for by abundant flower visits. The relationships between flowering phenology and fruit-set success of alpine plant communities highly depend on the type of pollinators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpine ecosystem; Bumble bee; Diptera; Flower production; Pollinator

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28889327     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3946-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Flower color influences insect visitation in alpine New Zealand.

Authors:  Diane R Campbell; Mascha Bischoff; Janice M Lord; Alastair W Robertson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Responses of social and solitary bees to pulsed floral resources.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Crone
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Onset of flowering and climate variability in an alpine landscape: a 10-year study from Swedish Lapland.

Authors:  Ulf Molau; Urban Nordenhäll; Bente Eriksen
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.844

4.  Maintenance of temporal synchrony between syrphid flies and floral resources despite differential phenological responses to climate.

Authors:  Amy M Iler; David W Inouye; Toke T Høye; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Laura A Burkle; Eleanor B Johnston
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  One fly to rule them all-muscid flies are the key pollinators in the Arctic.

Authors:  Mikko Tiusanen; Paul D N Hebert; Niels Martin Schmidt; Tomas Roslin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Variations in bumble bee preference and pollen limitation among neighboring populations: comparisons between Phyllodoce caerulea and Phyllodoce aleutica (Ericaceae) along snowmelt gradients.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kasagi; Gaku Kudo
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Fruitful factors: what limits seed production of flowering plants in the alpine?

Authors:  Jason R Straka; Brian M Starzomski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Flowering phenology influences seed production and outcrossing rate in populations of an alpine snowbed shrub, Phyllodoce aleutica: effects of pollinators and self-incompatibility.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Kameyama; Gaku Kudo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Pollen limitation is not the rule in nival plants: A study from the European Central Alps.

Authors:  Johanna Wagner; Martin Lechleitner; Daniela Hosp
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.844

10.  The forgotten flies: the importance of non-syrphid Diptera as pollinators.

Authors:  Katherine A Orford; Ian P Vaughan; Jane Memmott
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Intraspecific independent evolution of floral spur length in response to local flower visitor size in Japanese Aquilegia in different mountain regions.

Authors:  Tsubasa Toji; Shun K Hirota; Natsumi Ishimoto; Yoshihisa Suyama; Takao Itino
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Preceding Phenological Events Rather than Climate Drive the Variations in Fruiting Phenology in the Desert Shrub Nitraria tangutorum.

Authors:  Fang Bao; Zhiming Xin; Minghu Liu; Jiazhu Li; Ying Gao; Qi Lu; Bo Wu
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 3.  Low-cost observations and experiments return a high value in plant phenology research.

Authors:  Caitlin McDonough MacKenzie; Amanda S Gallinat; Lucy Zipf
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.511

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.