Literature DB >> 23640772

Maintenance of temporal synchrony between syrphid flies and floral resources despite differential phenological responses to climate.

Amy M Iler1, David W Inouye, Toke T Høye, Abraham J Miller-Rushing, Laura A Burkle, Eleanor B Johnston.   

Abstract

Variation in species' responses to abiotic phenological cues under climate change may cause changes in temporal overlap among interacting taxa, with potential demographic consequences. Here, we examine associations between the abiotic environment and plant-pollinator phenological synchrony using a long-term syrphid fly-flowering phenology dataset (1992-2011). Degree-days above freezing, precipitation, and timing of snow melt were investigated as predictors of phenology. Syrphids generally emerge after flowering onset and end their activity before the end of flowering. Neither flowering nor syrphid phenology has changed significantly over our 20-year record, consistent with a lack of directional change in climate variables over the same time frame. Instead we document interannual variability in the abiotic environment and phenology. Timing of snow melt was the best predictor of flowering onset and syrphid emergence. Snow melt and degree-days were the best predictors of the end of flowering, whereas degree-days and precipitation best predicted the end of the syrphid period. Flowering advanced at a faster rate than syrphids in response to both advancing snow melt and increasing temperature. Different rates of phenological advancements resulted in more days of temporal overlap between the flower-syrphid community in years of early snow melt because of extended activity periods. Phenological synchrony at the community level is therefore likely to be maintained for some time, even under advancing snow melt conditions that are evident over longer term records at our site. These results show that interacting taxa may respond to different phenological cues and to the same cues at different rates but still maintain phenological synchrony over a range of abiotic conditions. However, our results also indicate that some individual plant species may overlap with the syrphid community for fewer days under continued climate change. This highlights the role of interannual variation in these flower-syrphid interactions and shows that species-level responses can differ from community-level responses in nonintuitive ways.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory; climate change; hoverfly; mismatch; phenology; pollinator; synchrony; syrphidae

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23640772     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  21 in total

1.  When spring ephemerals fail to meet pollinators: mechanism of phenological mismatch and its impact on plant reproduction.

Authors:  Gaku Kudo; Elisabeth J Cooper
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Climate-induced phenological shifts in a Batesian mimicry complex.

Authors:  Christopher Hassall; Jac Billington; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Insects and recent climate change.

Authors:  Christopher A Halsch; Arthur M Shapiro; James A Fordyce; Chris C Nice; James H Thorne; David P Waetjen; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Herbarium specimens reveal substantial and unexpected variation in phenological sensitivity across the eastern United States.

Authors:  Daniel S Park; Ian Breckheimer; Alex C Williams; Edith Law; Aaron M Ellison; Charles C Davis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A linkage between flowering phenology and fruit-set success of alpine plant communities with reference to the seasonality and pollination effectiveness of bees and flies.

Authors:  Yuki Mizunaga; Gaku Kudo
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Global shifts in the phenological synchrony of species interactions over recent decades.

Authors:  Heather M Kharouba; Johan Ehrlén; Andrew Gelman; Kjell Bolmgren; Jenica M Allen; Steve E Travers; Elizabeth M Wolkovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phenological shifts and the fate of mutualisms.

Authors:  Nicole E Rafferty; Paul J CaraDonna; Judith L Bronstein
Journal:  Oikos       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.903

8.  Multitrophic interactions mediate the effects of climate change on herbivore abundance.

Authors:  Ayla Robinson; David W Inouye; Jane E Ogilvie; Emily H Mooney
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The impact of climatic variations on the reproductive success of Gentiana lutea L. in a Mediterranean mountain area.

Authors:  Alba Cuena-Lombraña; Mauro Fois; Giuseppe Fenu; Donatella Cogoni; Gianluigi Bacchetta
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.787

10.  Community-level phenological response to climate change.

Authors:  Otso Ovaskainen; Svetlana Skorokhodova; Marina Yakovleva; Alexander Sukhov; Anatoliy Kutenkov; Nadezhda Kutenkova; Anatoliy Shcherbakov; Evegeniy Meyke; Maria del Mar Delgado
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.