Literature DB >> 28887134

Decreased non-specific adhesivity, receptor targeted (DART) nanoparticles exhibit improved dispersion, cellular uptake, and tumor retention in invasive gliomas.

Aniket S Wadajkar1, Jimena G Dancy1, Nathan B Roberts1, Nina P Connolly1, Dudley K Strickland2, Jeffrey A Winkles3, Graeme F Woodworth4, Anthony J Kim5.   

Abstract

The most common and deadly form of primary brain cancer, glioblastoma (GBM), is characterized by significant intratumoral heterogeneity, microvascular proliferation, immune system suppression, and brain tissue invasion. Delivering effective and sustained treatments to the invasive GBM cells intermixed with functioning neural elements is a major goal of advanced therapeutic systems for brain cancer. Previously, we investigated the nanoparticle characteristics that enable targeting of invasive GBM cells. This revealed the importance of minimizing non-specific binding within the relatively adhesive, 'sticky' microenvironment of the brain and brain tumors in particular. We refer to such nanoformulations with decreased non-specific adhesivity and receptor targeting as 'DART' therapeutics. In this work, we applied this information toward the design and characterization of biodegradable nanocarriers, and in vivo testing in orthotopic experimental gliomas. We formulated particulate nanocarriers using poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and PLGA-polyethylene glycol (PLGA-PEG) polymers to generate sub-100nm nanoparticles with minimal binding to extracellular brain components and strong binding to the Fn14 receptor - an upregulated, conserved component in invasive GBM. Multiple particle tracking in brain tissue slices and in vivo testing in orthotopic murine malignant glioma revealed preserved nanoparticle diffusivity and increased uptake in brain tumor cells. These combined characteristics also resulted in longer retention of the DART nanoparticles within the orthotopic tumors compared to non-targeted versions. Taken together, these results and nanoparticle design considerations offer promising new methods to optimize therapeutic nanocarriers for improving drug delivery and treatment for invasive brain tumors.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodegradable nanoparticles; Fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14; Glioblastoma; Invasive malignant glioma; Multiple particle tracking; Surface plasmon resonance; Targeted therapeutics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28887134      PMCID: PMC5723214          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  38 in total

Review 1.  Targeted therapy for brain tumours.

Authors:  Maciej S Lesniak; Henry Brem
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  EGFRvIII antibody-conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging-guided convection-enhanced delivery and targeted therapy of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Costas G Hadjipanayis; Revaz Machaidze; Milota Kaluzova; Liya Wang; Albert J Schuette; Hongwei Chen; Xinying Wu; Hui Mao
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Convection enhanced delivery of cisplatin-loaded brain penetrating nanoparticles cures malignant glioma in rats.

Authors:  Clark Zhang; Elizabeth A Nance; Panagiotis Mastorakos; Jane Chisholm; Sneha Berry; Charles Eberhart; Betty Tyler; Henry Brem; Jung Soo Suk; Justin Hanes
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Interstitial chemotherapy with carmustine-loaded polymers for high-grade gliomas: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  S Valtonen; U Timonen; P Toivanen; H Kalimo; L Kivipelto; O Heiskanen; G Unsgaard; T Kuurne
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Poor drug distribution as a possible explanation for the results of the PRECISE trial.

Authors:  John H Sampson; Gary Archer; Christoph Pedain; Eva Wembacher-Schröder; Manfred Westphal; Sandeep Kunwar; Michael A Vogelbaum; April Coan; James E Herndon; Raghu Raghavan; Martin L Brady; David A Reardon; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman; M Inmaculada Rodríguez-Ponce; Susan M Chang; Stephan Mittermeyer; David Croteau; Raj K Puri
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Nanotherapeutic systems for local treatment of brain tumors.

Authors:  Rami Walid Chakroun; Pengcheng Zhang; Ran Lin; Paula Schiapparelli; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Honggang Cui
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-05-24

7.  Minimizing the non-specific binding of nanoparticles to the brain enables active targeting of Fn14-positive glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  Craig S Schneider; Jimena G Perez; Emily Cheng; Clark Zhang; Panagiotis Mastorakos; Justin Hanes; Jeffrey A Winkles; Graeme F Woodworth; Anthony J Kim
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Non-specific binding and steric hindrance thresholds for penetration of particulate drug carriers within tumor tissue.

Authors:  Jimena G Dancy; Aniket S Wadajkar; Craig S Schneider; Joseph R H Mauban; Olga G Goloubeva; Graeme F Woodworth; Jeffrey A Winkles; Anthony J Kim
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  TWEAK binding to the Fn14 cysteine-rich domain depends on charged residues located in both the A1 and D2 modules.

Authors:  Sharron A N Brown; Heather N Hanscom; Hong Vu; Shelesa A Brew; Jeffrey A Winkles
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 10.  Emerging insights into barriers to effective brain tumor therapeutics.

Authors:  Graeme F Woodworth; Gavin P Dunn; Elizabeth A Nance; Justin Hanes; Henry Brem
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  14 in total

1.  Leveraging Surface Plasmon Resonance to Dissect the Interfacial Properties of Nanoparticles: Implications for Tissue Binding and Tumor Penetration.

Authors:  Aniket S Wadajkar; Jimena G Dancy; Christine P Carney; Brian S Hampton; Heather M Ames; Jeffrey A Winkles; Graeme F Woodworth; Anthony J Kim
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 5.307

2.  Ultrasmall Core-Shell Silica Nanoparticles for Precision Drug Delivery in a High-Grade Malignant Brain Tumor Model.

Authors:  Rupa Juthani; Brian Madajewski; Barney Yoo; Ulrich Wiesner; Michelle S Bradbury; Cameron W Brennan; Li Zhang; Pei-Ming Chen; Feng Chen; Melik Z Turker; Kai Ma; Michael Overholtzer; Valerie A Longo; Sean Carlin; Virginia Aragon-Sanabria; Jason Huse; Mithat Gonen; Pat Zanzonico; Charles M Rudin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Targeting visualization of malignant tumor based on the alteration of DWI signal generated by hTERT promoter-driven AQP1 overexpression.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Mingfu Gong; Sheng Lei; Chun Cui; Yun Liu; Shilin Xiao; Xun Kang; Tao Sun; Zhongsheng Xu; Chunyu Zhou; Si Zhang; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Engineering of L-Plastin Peptide-Loaded Biodegradable Nanoparticles for Sustained Delivery and Suppression of Osteoclast Function In Vitro.

Authors:  Sunipa Majumdar; Aniket S Wadajkar; Hanan Aljohani; Mark A Reynolds; Anthony J Kim; Meenakshi Chellaiah
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2019-05-05

5.  Decreased nonspecific adhesivity, receptor-targeted therapeutic nanoparticles for primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jimena G Dancy; Aniket S Wadajkar; Nina P Connolly; Rebeca Galisteo; Heather M Ames; Sen Peng; Nhan L Tran; Olga G Goloubeva; Graeme F Woodworth; Jeffrey A Winkles; Anthony J Kim
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 6.  Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery.

Authors:  Michael J Mitchell; Margaret M Billingsley; Rebecca M Haley; Marissa E Wechsler; Nicholas A Peppas; Robert Langer
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  A Novel Immune-Related Prognostic Biomarker and Target Associated With Malignant Progression of Glioma.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Xin Yang; Xiao-Lin Zhu; Zhuang-Zhuang Wang; Hao Bai; Jun-Jie Zhang; Chun-Yan Hao; Hu-Bin Duan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Harnessing nanomedicine for enhanced immunotherapy for breast cancer brain metastases.

Authors:  Christine P Carney; Nikhil Pandey; Anshika Kapur; Graeme F Woodworth; Jeffrey A Winkles; Anthony J Kim
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 9.  Nanoparticles as immunomodulators and translational agents in brain tumors.

Authors:  Adam J Grippin; Kyle A Dyson; Sadeem Qdaisat; James McGuiness; Brandon Wummer; Duane A Mitchell; Hector R Mendez-Gomez; Elias J Sayour
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Local Delivery and Glioblastoma: Why Not Combining Sustained Release and Targeting?

Authors:  Claire Gazaille; Marion Sicot; Patrick Saulnier; Joël Eyer; Guillaume Bastiat
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.