Literature DB >> 31176045

Leveraging Surface Plasmon Resonance to Dissect the Interfacial Properties of Nanoparticles: Implications for Tissue Binding and Tumor Penetration.

Aniket S Wadajkar1, Jimena G Dancy1, Christine P Carney2, Brian S Hampton3, Heather M Ames4, Jeffrey A Winkles5, Graeme F Woodworth1, Anthony J Kim6.   

Abstract

Therapeutic efficacy of nanoparticle-drug formulations for cancer applications is significantly impacted by the extent of intra-tumoral accumulation and tumor tissue penetration. We advanced the application of surface plasmon resonance to examine interfacial properties of various clinical and emerging nanoparticles related to tumor tissue penetration. We observed that amine-terminated or positively-charged dendrimers and liposomes bound strongly to tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, whereas hydroxyl/carboxyl-terminated dendrimers and PEGylated/neutrally-charged liposomes did not bind. In addition, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles formulated with cholic acid or F127 surfactants bound strongly to tumor ECM proteins, whereas nanoparticles formulated with poly(vinyl alcohol) did not bind. Unexpectedly, following blood serum incubation, this binding increased and particle transport in ex vivo tumor tissues reduced markedly. Finally, we characterized the protein corona on PLGA nanoparticles using quantitative proteomics. Through these studies, we identified valuable criteria for particle surface characteristics that are likely to mediate their tissue binding and tumor penetration.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nanoparticles; Non-specific binding; Protein corona; Proteomics; Surface plasmon resonance (SPR); Tumor penetration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31176045      PMCID: PMC6702074          DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2019.102024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanomedicine        ISSN: 1549-9634            Impact factor:   5.307


  43 in total

1.  Effects of the presence or absence of a protein corona on silica nanoparticle uptake and impact on cells.

Authors:  Anna Lesniak; Federico Fenaroli; Marco P Monopoli; Christoffer Åberg; Kenneth A Dawson; Anna Salvati
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 2.  The emergence of multiple particle tracking in intracellular trafficking of nanomedicines.

Authors:  Anthony J Kim; Justin Hanes
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2012-02-03

3.  Tumor vascular permeability, accumulation, and penetration of macromolecular drug carriers.

Authors:  Matthew R Dreher; Wenge Liu; Charles R Michelich; Mark W Dewhirst; Fan Yuan; Ashutosh Chilkoti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Surface Functionalization of Nanoparticles with Polyethylene Glycol: Effects on Protein Adsorption and Cellular Uptake.

Authors:  Beatriz Pelaz; Pablo del Pino; Pauline Maffre; Raimo Hartmann; Marta Gallego; Sara Rivera-Fernández; Jesus M de la Fuente; G Ulrich Nienhaus; Wolfgang J Parak
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Towards Optimal Design of Cancer Nanomedicines: Multi-stage Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos; Eva-Athena Economides; James W Baish; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Challenges and key considerations of the enhanced permeability and retention effect for nanomedicine drug delivery in oncology.

Authors:  Uma Prabhakar; Hiroshi Maeda; Rakesh K Jain; Eva M Sevick-Muraca; William Zamboni; Omid C Farokhzad; Simon T Barry; Alberto Gabizon; Piotr Grodzinski; David C Blakey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review.

Authors:  R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Facing the truth about nanotechnology in drug delivery.

Authors:  Kinam Park
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Effect of shape, size, and aspect ratio on nanoparticle penetration and distribution inside solid tissues using 3D spheroid models.

Authors:  Rachit Agarwal; Patrick Jurney; Mansi Raythatha; Vikramjit Singh; Sidlgata V Sreenivasan; Li Shi; Krishnendu Roy
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 11.092

10.  Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable tumours depends on size.

Authors:  H Cabral; Y Matsumoto; K Mizuno; Q Chen; M Murakami; M Kimura; Y Terada; M R Kano; K Miyazono; M Uesaka; N Nishiyama; K Kataoka
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 40.523

View more
  4 in total

1.  Decreased nonspecific adhesivity, receptor-targeted therapeutic nanoparticles for primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jimena G Dancy; Aniket S Wadajkar; Nina P Connolly; Rebeca Galisteo; Heather M Ames; Sen Peng; Nhan L Tran; Olga G Goloubeva; Graeme F Woodworth; Jeffrey A Winkles; Anthony J Kim
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 2.  Surface Plasmon Resonance as a Characterization Tool for Lipid Nanoparticles Used in Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Cecilia Yamil Chain; María Antonieta Daza Millone; José Sebastián Cisneros; Eduardo Alejandro Ramirez; María Elena Vela
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.221

3.  Raltitrexed-Modified Gold and Silver Nanoparticles for Targeted Cancer Therapy: Cytotoxicity Behavior In Vitro on A549 and HCT-116 Human Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Jeroni Morey; Pere Llinás; Alberto Bueno-Costa; Alberto J León; M Nieves Piña
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 4.  Nanoformulations of Ursolic Acid: A Modern Natural Anticancer Molecule.

Authors:  Longyun Wang; Qianqian Yin; Cun Liu; Ying Tang; Changgang Sun; Jing Zhuang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.810

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.