INTRODUCTION: Recent research indicates that mindfulness-based interventions are effective for stress, maladaptive weight-related behaviors, and weight loss. Little is presently known about their applicability and effectiveness when delivered electronically, including through Web-based and mobile device media. The primary aims of this review were to identify what types of electronic mindfulness-based interventions have been undertaken for stress, maladaptive weight-related behaviors, and weight loss, and to assess their overall effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases was undertaken in June 2016. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were identified that met inclusion criteria and were selected in the final review. Of these, 19 were mindfulness-based interventions for stress reduction. Two were Web-based mindful eating/intuitive eating interventions for weight. Only one electronic mindfulness-based study was identified that targeted both stress and maladaptive weight-related behaviors. Most electronic interventions were effective for stress reduction N = 14/19 (74%). There were insufficient electronic mindfulness-based interventions for weight to determine if they were effective or not. Additionally, no mobile mindfulness-based intervention was identified for weight or weight-related behaviors. CONCLUSION: Electronic mindfulness-based interventions through diverse media appear to be effective for stress reduction. More studies are needed that target weight and weight-related behaviors as well as studies that target both stress and weight. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assess mobile mindfulness-based apps are needed as we only identified four app trials for stress. Mobile mindfulness-based interventions for weight and weight-related behaviors are a future area of research novelty.
INTRODUCTION: Recent research indicates that mindfulness-based interventions are effective for stress, maladaptive weight-related behaviors, and weight loss. Little is presently known about their applicability and effectiveness when delivered electronically, including through Web-based and mobile device media. The primary aims of this review were to identify what types of electronic mindfulness-based interventions have been undertaken for stress, maladaptive weight-related behaviors, and weight loss, and to assess their overall effectiveness. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases was undertaken in June 2016. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were identified that met inclusion criteria and were selected in the final review. Of these, 19 were mindfulness-based interventions for stress reduction. Two were Web-based mindful eating/intuitive eating interventions for weight. Only one electronic mindfulness-based study was identified that targeted both stress and maladaptive weight-related behaviors. Most electronic interventions were effective for stress reduction N = 14/19 (74%). There were insufficient electronic mindfulness-based interventions for weight to determine if they were effective or not. Additionally, no mobile mindfulness-based intervention was identified for weight or weight-related behaviors. CONCLUSION: Electronic mindfulness-based interventions through diverse media appear to be effective for stress reduction. More studies are needed that target weight and weight-related behaviors as well as studies that target both stress and weight. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assess mobile mindfulness-based apps are needed as we only identified four app trials for stress. Mobile mindfulness-based interventions for weight and weight-related behaviors are a future area of research novelty.
Entities:
Keywords:
and e-Health; m-Health; mindful eating; mindfulness; stress reduction; weight loss
Authors: Emma R Lawlor; Nazrul Islam; Simon J Griffin; Andrew J Hill; Carly A Hughes; Amy L Ahern Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Gema Castillo-Sánchez; Olga Sacristán-Martín; María A Hernández; Irene Muñoz; Isabel de la Torre; Manuel Franco-Martín Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Emma R Lawlor; Nazrul Islam; Sarah Bates; Simon J Griffin; Andrew J Hill; Carly A Hughes; Stephen J Sharp; Amy L Ahern Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Maren Goetz; Claudia Schiele; Markus Wallwiener; Stephanie Wallwiener; Mitho Müller; Lina M Matthies; Thomas M Deutsch; Claudio Spano; Johanna Graf; Stephan Zipfel; Armin Bauer; Sara Y Brucker Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Rodolfo Castro; Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves; Cátia Oliveira; Carmen Phang Romero; Hugo Perazzo; Mario Simjanoski; Flavio Kapciznki; Vicent Balanzá-Martínez; Raquel B De Boni Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-01-03