Literature DB >> 28885506

The Theory and Practice of Pancreatic Surgery in France.

Olivier Farges1, Noelle Bendersky, Stéphanie Truant, Jean Robert Delpero, François René Pruvot, Alain Sauvanet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Measure the caseload of pancreatectomies that influences their short-term outcome, at a national level, and assess the applicability of a centralization policy.
BACKGROUND: There is agreement that pancreatectomies should be centralized. However, previous studies have failed to accurately define a "high-volume" center.
METHODS: French healthcare databases were screened to identify all adult patients who had elective pancreatectomies between 2007 and 2012. The patients' age, comorbidities, indication, and extent of surgery, and also the hospital administrative-type and location were retrieved. The annual-caseload of pancreatectomy was calculated for each hospital facility. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Spline modeling was used to identify the different annual-caseload that influenced mortality. Logistic regressions were performed to assess if their influence was independent of confounders, and the accuracy of the model calculated.
RESULTS: Overall, 22,366 patients underwent a pancreatectomy and the mortality was 8.1%. Two cut-offs were identified (25 and 65 per year): compared with centers performing >65 resections per year, the adjusted OR of mortality was 1.865 (1.529-2.276) in centers performing ≤25 resections per year and 1.234 (1.031-1.478) in those performing 26 to 65 resections per year. The average number of facilities performing ≤25, 26 to 65, and >65 pancreatectomies per year was 456, 20, and 9, respectively. The percentage of patients operated in these facilities was 56.6%, 19.9%, and 23.3%, respectively.For pancreaticoduodenectomies (12,670 patients; mortality 9.2%), there were 2 cut-offs (16 and 40 pancreaticoduodenectomies per year), and both were independent predictors of mortality (adjusted OR of 1.979 and 1.333). For distal pancreatectomies (7085 patients; 6.2% mortality), there were 2 cut-offs (13 and 25 distal pancreatectomies per year), but neither was an independent predictor of outcome (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the model = 0.778).
CONCLUSIONS: Centralization of pancreatic surgery is theoretically justified, but currently unrealizable. As the incidence of pancreatic cancer increases, there is an urgent need to improve the training of surgeons and develop both intermediate and high-volume centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28885506     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

1.  What's the next step in evaluating laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Fernando Burdío; Luís Grande; Ignasi Poves
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe.

Authors:  Adam Polonski; Jakob R Izbicki; Faik G Uzunoglu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Clinical Efficacy of the Preservation of the Hepatic Branch of the Vagus Nerve on Delayed Gastric Emptying After Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Xu Li; Tingting Qin; Feng Zhu; Min Wang; Chao Dang; Li He; Shutao Pan; Yuhui Liu; Taoyuan Yin; Yecheng Feng; Xin Wang; Yahong Yu; Ming Shen; Xingpei Lu; Yongjun Chen; Li Jiang; Chenjian Shi; Renyi Qin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Mortality factors in pancreatic surgery: A systematic review. How important is the hospital volume?

Authors:  Richard Hunger; Barbara Seliger; Shuji Ogino; Rene Mantke
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 13.400

5.  One-Year Postoperative Mortality in MEN1 Patients Operated on Gastric and Duodenopancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An AFCE and GTE Cohort Study.

Authors:  Niki Christou; Muriel Mathonnet; Sébastien Gaujoux; Guillaume Cadiot; Sophie Deguelte; Jean-Louis Kraimps; Jean-Christophe Lifante; Fabrice Menegaux; Eric Mirallié; Fabrice Muscari; Bruno Carnaille; François Pattou; Alain Sauvanet; Pierre Goudet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Elie Chouillard; Mohamed Abu Hilal; Roland Croner; Brice Gayet; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A pancreatic zone at higher risk of fistula after enucleation.

Authors:  Pauline Duconseil; Ugo Marchese; Jacques Ewald; Marc Giovannini; Djamel Mokart; Jean-Robert Delpero; Olivier Turrini
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas and European guidelines: importance of the surgery type in the decision-making process.

Authors:  Etienne Buscail; Thomas Cauvin; Benjamin Fernandez; Camille Buscail; Marion Marty; Bruno Lapuyade; Clément Subtil; Jean-Philippe Adam; Véronique Vendrely; Sandrine Dabernat; Christophe Laurent; Laurence Chiche
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  An update on treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Aurélien Lambert; Lilian Schwarz; Ivan Borbath; Aline Henry; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; David Malka; Michel Ducreux; Thierry Conroy
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 8.168

10.  Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm-A Pancreas2000/EPC Study.

Authors:  Marcus Hollenbach; Einas Abou Ali; Francesco Auriemma; Aiste Gulla; Christian Heise; Sara Regnér; Sébastien Gaujoux
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.