Literature DB >> 28884230

Environmental impacts caused by cemeteries and crematoria, new funeral technologies, and preferences of the Northeastern and Southern Brazilian population as for the funeral process.

Nicholas Joseph Tavares da Cruz1, Álvaro Guillermo Rojas Lezana2, Paulo da Cruz Freire Dos Santos3, Ibsen Mateus Bittencourt Santana Pinto3, Claudio Zancan3, Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza4.   

Abstract

Cemeteries and crematoria are the main funeral ways used in the world nowadays. It is a little-studied segment in the present days, mainly as for the possible environmental impacts in the environment, such as those derived from dental amalgam, prostheses, and dioxins, among other. This article aimed to identify the environmental impacts caused by cemeteries and crematoria and to point out new trends in funeral processes such as freeze-drying and alkaline hydrolysis. The study is justified due to the large part of the Brazilian population that do not know the environmental impacts caused by cemeteries and crematoria, as well as to bring information about the new processes. For that, a research was carried out with 400 people. The main results show that among all the funeral processes, the new freeze-drying process was opted by 33% of the sample. We also identified that the main reasons for choosing the funeral process were less environmental impact (28%), no after-death expenses (grave payment) (16.1%), and the possibility of putting away or throwing away the remains wherever you want (14.9%). Finally, new funeral processes were well accepted by the Brazilian population-those who were interviewed-due to their benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alkaline hydrolysis; Cemetery; Crematoria; Environmental impacts; Freeze-drying

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28884230     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0005-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  20 in total

1.  PCDDs/DFs emissions from crematories in Japan.

Authors:  N Takeda; M Takaoka; T Fujiwara; H Takeyama; S Eguchi
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  "No one has ever asked for it back!" A survey assessing the fate of reusable external fixation equipment in mortuaries.

Authors:  A Timms; T Sorkin; H Pugh; M Barry; W D Goodier
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Impact of cemeteries on groundwater contamination by bacteria and viruses - a review.

Authors:  Józef Żychowski; Tomasz Bryndal
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Probabilistic human health risk of PCDD/F exposure: a socioeconomic assessment.

Authors:  Martí Nadal; Marta Schuhmacher; José L Domingo
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2004-09-23

Review 5.  Policy Development Fosters Collaborative Practice: The Example of the Minamata Convention on Mercury.

Authors:  Daniel M Meyer; Linda M Kaste; Kathy M Lituri; Scott Tomar; Christopher H Fox; Poul Erik Petersen
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2016-10

6.  [Mercury emission measurements in a crematorium. The dentistry aspects].

Authors:  C Matter-Grütter; R Baillod; T Imfeld; F Lutz
Journal:  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed       Date:  1995

7.  Pacemaker explosions in crematoria: problems and possible solutions.

Authors:  Christopher P Gale; Graham P Mulley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 18.000

8.  Longitudinal analysis of the association between removal of dental amalgam, urine mercury and 14 self-reported health symptoms.

Authors:  Jennifer D Zwicker; Daniel J Dutton; John Charles Herbert Emery
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 9.  Global Sources and Pathways of Mercury in the Context of Human Health.

Authors:  Kyrre Sundseth; Jozef M Pacyna; Elisabeth G Pacyna; Nicola Pirrone; Rebecca J Thorne
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Radiation safety issues regarding the cremation of the body of an I-125 prostate implant patient.

Authors:  W Que
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.