Literature DB >> 28882231

Hemodynamic Response to Nitroprusside in Patients With Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

James W Lloyd1, Rick A Nishimura1, Barry A Borlaug1, Mackram F Eleid2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LGSAS) with preserved ejection fraction (EF) is incompletely understood. The influence of arterial afterload and diastolic dysfunction on the hemodynamic presentation of LGSAS remains unknown.
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to determine the acute hemodynamic response to sodium nitroprusside in LGSAS with preserved EF.
METHODS: Symptomatic patients with LGSAS and preserved EF underwent cardiac catheterization with comparison of hemodynamic measurements before and after nitroprusside.
RESULTS: Forty-one subjects (25 with low flow [LF], stroke volume index [SVI] ≤35 ml/m2, 16 with normal flow [NF]) were included. At baseline, LF patients had lower total arterial compliance (0.36 ± 0.12 ml/m2/mm Hg vs. 0.48 ± 0.16 ml/m2/mm Hg; p = 0.01) and greater effective arterial elastance (2.77 ± 0.84 mm Hg · m2/ml vs. 1.89 ± 0.82 mm Hg · m2/ml; p = 0.002). In all patients, nitroprusside reduced elastance, left ventricular filling pressures, and pulmonary artery pressures and improved compliance (p < 0.05). Aortic valve area increased to ≥1.0 cm2 in 6 LF (24%) and 4 NF (25%) subjects. Change in SVI with nitroprusside varied inversely to baseline SVI and demonstrated improvement in LF only (3 ± 6 ml/m2; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Nitroprusside reduces afterload and left ventricular filling pressures in patients with LGSAS and preserved EF, enabling reclassification to moderate stenosis in 25% of patients. An inverse relationship between baseline SVI and change in SVI with afterload reduction was observed, suggesting that heightened sensitivity to afterload is a significant contributor to LF-LGSAS pathophysiology. These data highlight the utility of afterload reduction in the diagnostic assessment of LGSAS.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; catheterization; low gradient; nitroprusside; pathophysiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28882231     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  10 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and heart failure.

Authors:  Chirag Bavishi; Dhaval Kolte; Paul C Gordon; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis; the Diagnostic Dilemma.

Authors:  Osama Alkhalaila; Mansour Al Shehadat
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 3.  Multiscale simulations of left ventricular growth and remodeling.

Authors:  Hossein Sharifi; Charles K Mann; Alexus L Rockward; Mohammad Mehri; Joy Mojumder; Lik-Chuan Lee; Kenneth S Campbell; Jonathan F Wenk
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-08-25

Review 4.  Antihypertensive Treatment in Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Tae Soo Kang; Sungha Park
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06-22

5.  Aortic pulse wave velocity and its relationship with transaortic flow and gradients in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Shraddha Ranjan; Hardeep Kaur Grewal; Ravi R Kasliwal; Naresh Trehan; Manish Bansal
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-06-27

6.  Arterial Wave Reflection and Aortic Valve Stenosis: Diagnostic Challenges and Prognostic Significance.

Authors:  Stamatia Pagoulatou; Dionysios Adamopoulos; Georgios Rovas; Vasiliki Bikia; Hajo Müller; Georgios Giannakopoulos; Sarah Mauler-Wittwer; Marc-Joseph Licker; Nikolaos Stergiopulos; Stéphane Noble
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-08

Review 7.  Current Evidence and Future Perspectives on Pharmacological Treatment of Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Maristella Donato; Nicola Ferri; Maria Giovanna Lupo; Elisabetta Faggin; Marcello Rattazzi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Characterisation of aortic stenosis severity: a retrospective analysis of echocardiography reports in a clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Michael A Raddatz; Holly M Gonzales; Eric Farber-Eger; Quinn S Wells; Brian R Lindman; W David Merryman
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-08

9.  Antihypertensive therapies in moderate or severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Sen; Erin Chung; Christopher Neil; Thomas Marwick
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The relationship between baseline diastolic dysfunction and postimplantation invasive hemodynamics with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Anthony A Bavry; Taishi Okuno; Seyed Hossein Aalaei-Andabili; Dharam J Kumbhani; Stefan Stortecky; Masahiko Asami; Jonas Lanz; Stephan Windecker; Thomas Pilgrim
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.882

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.