Literature DB >> 28881890

Active surveillance in clinically complete responders after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer.

B J Noordman1, B P L Wijnhoven1, S M Lagarde1, K Biermann2, A van der Gaast3, M C W Spaander4, R Valkema5, J J B van Lanschot1.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery is standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer in many countries. After nCRT up to one third of all patients have a pathologically complete response in the resection specimen, posing an ethical imperative to reconsider the necessity of standard surgery in all operable patients after nCRT. An active surveillance strategy following nCRT, in which patients are subjected to frequent clinical investigations after the completion of neoadjuvant therapy, has been evaluated in other types of cancer with promising results. In esophageal cancer, both patients who are cured by neoadjuvant therapy alone as well as patients with subclinical disseminated disease at the time of completion of neoadjuvant therapy may benefit from such an organ sparing approach. Active surveillance is currently applied in selected patients with esophageal cancer who refuse surgery or are medically unfit for major surgery after completion of nCRT, but this strategy is not (yet) adopted as an alternative to standard surgery or definitive chemoradiation. The available literature is scarce, but suggests that long-term oncological outcomes after active surveillance are noninferior compared to standard surgical resection, providing justification for comparison of both treatments in a phase III trial. This review gives an overview of the current knowledge regarding active surveillance after completion of nCRT in esophageal cancer and outlines future research perspectives.
© The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal cancer surveillance; esophagectomy; neoadjuvant chemoradiation; response evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28881890     DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer: implications for surgery].

Authors:  Giovanni Capovilla; Caterina Froiio; Hauke Lang; Felix Berlth; Peter Philipp Grimminger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Long-Term, Health-Related Quality of Life after Open and Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Procedures-A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Mehdorn; Thorben Möller; Frederike Franke; Florian Richter; Jan-Niclas Kersebaum; Thomas Becker; Jan-Hendrik Egberts
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Distribution of lymph node metastases in locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (cT2-4): comparison between Siewert type I and selected Siewert type II tumors.

Authors:  Akio Sakaki; Jun Kanamori; Koshiro Ishiyama; Daisuke Kurita; Junya Oguma; Hiroyuki Daiko
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Preoperative Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Using 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Alicia S Borggreve; Lucas Goense; Peter S N van Rossum; Sophie E Heethuis; Richard van Hillegersberg; Jan J W Lagendijk; Marnix G E H Lam; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Stella Mook; Jelle P Ruurda; Marco van Vulpen; Francine E M Voncken; Berthe M P Aleman; Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten; Jingfei Ma; Penny Fang; Benjamin C Musall; Steven H Lin; Gert J Meijer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer: The role of active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  Tania Triantafyllou; Bas Wijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-07-25

6.  Gross tumour delineation on computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oesophageal cancer: A nationwide study.

Authors:  M E Nowee; F E M Voncken; A N T J Kotte; L Goense; P S N van Rossum; A L H M W van Lier; S W Heijmink; B M P Aleman; J Nijkamp; G J Meijer; I M Lips
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-26

7.  Preoperative image-guided identification of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer (PRIDE): a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  A S Borggreve; S Mook; M Verheij; V E M Mul; J J Bergman; A Bartels-Rutten; L C Ter Beek; R G H Beets-Tan; R J Bennink; M I van Berge Henegouwen; L A A Brosens; I L Defize; J M van Dieren; H Dijkstra; R van Hillegersberg; M C Hulshof; H W M van Laarhoven; M G E H Lam; A L H M W van Lier; C T Muijs; W B Nagengast; A J Nederveen; W Noordzij; J T M Plukker; P S N van Rossum; J P Ruurda; J W van Sandick; B L A M Weusten; F E M Voncken; D Yakar; G J Meijer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Optimal timing for prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Alicia S Borggreve; Sophie E Heethuis; Mick R Boekhoff; Lucas Goense; Peter S N van Rossum; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Richard van Hillegersberg; Jan J W Lagendijk; Stella Mook; Jelle P Ruurda; Gert J Meijer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.