Alicia S Borggreve1, Lucas Goense1, Peter S N van Rossum2, Sophie E Heethuis2, Richard van Hillegersberg3, Jan J W Lagendijk2, Marnix G E H Lam4, Astrid L H M W van Lier2, Stella Mook2, Jelle P Ruurda3, Marco van Vulpen5, Francine E M Voncken6, Berthe M P Aleman6, Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten7, Jingfei Ma8, Penny Fang9, Benjamin C Musall8, Steven H Lin9, Gert J Meijer10. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. 5. Proton Therapy Center Delft, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 7. Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 8. Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 9. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Electronic address: G.J.Meijer@umcutrecht.nl.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Accurate preoperative prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer could enable omission of esophagectomy in patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR). This study aimed to evaluate the individual and combined value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) during and after nCRT to predict pathologic response in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this multicenter prospective study, patients scheduled to receive nCRT followed by esophagectomy for esophageal cancer underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI scanning before the start of nCRT, during nCRT, and before esophagectomy. Response to nCRT was based on histopathologic evaluation of the resection specimen. Relative changes in 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI parameters were compared between patients with pCR and non-pCR groups. Multivariable ridge regression analyses with bootstrapped c-indices were performed to evaluate the individual and combined value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI. RESULTS: pCR was found in 26.1% of 69 patients. Relative changes in 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters after nCRT (Δ standardized uptake value [SUV]mean,postP = .016, and Δ total lesion glycolysis postP = .024), as well as changes in DW-MRI parameters during nCRT (Δ apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]duringP = .008) were significantly different between pCR and non-pCR. A c-statistic of 0.84 was obtained for a model with ΔADCduring, ΔSUVmean,post, and histology in classifying patients as pCR (versus 0.82 for ΔADCduring and 0.79 for ΔSUVmean,post alone). CONCLUSIONS: Changes on 18F-FDG PET/CT after nCRT and early changes on DW-MRI during nCRT can help identify pCR to nCRT in esophageal cancer. Moreover, 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI might be of complementary value in the assessment of pCR.
PURPOSE: Accurate preoperative prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer could enable omission of esophagectomy in patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR). This study aimed to evaluate the individual and combined value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) during and after nCRT to predict pathologic response in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this multicenter prospective study, patients scheduled to receive nCRT followed by esophagectomy for esophageal cancer underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI scanning before the start of nCRT, during nCRT, and before esophagectomy. Response to nCRT was based on histopathologic evaluation of the resection specimen. Relative changes in 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI parameters were compared between patients with pCR and non-pCR groups. Multivariable ridge regression analyses with bootstrapped c-indices were performed to evaluate the individual and combined value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI. RESULTS: pCR was found in 26.1% of 69 patients. Relative changes in 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters after nCRT (Δ standardized uptake value [SUV]mean,postP = .016, and Δ total lesion glycolysis postP = .024), as well as changes in DW-MRI parameters during nCRT (Δ apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]duringP = .008) were significantly different between pCR and non-pCR. A c-statistic of 0.84 was obtained for a model with ΔADCduring, ΔSUVmean,post, and histology in classifying patients as pCR (versus 0.82 for ΔADCduring and 0.79 for ΔSUVmean,post alone). CONCLUSIONS: Changes on 18F-FDG PET/CT after nCRT and early changes on DW-MRI during nCRT can help identify pCR to nCRT in esophageal cancer. Moreover, 18F-FDG PET/CT and DW-MRI might be of complementary value in the assessment of pCR.
Authors: P van Hagen; M C C M Hulshof; J J B van Lanschot; E W Steyerberg; M I van Berge Henegouwen; B P L Wijnhoven; D J Richel; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; G A P Hospers; J J Bonenkamp; M A Cuesta; R J B Blaisse; O R C Busch; F J W ten Kate; G-J Creemers; C J A Punt; J T M Plukker; H M W Verheul; E J Spillenaar Bilgen; H van Dekken; M J C van der Sangen; T Rozema; K Biermann; J C Beukema; A H M Piet; C M van Rij; J G Reinders; H W Tilanus; A van der Gaast Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: B J Noordman; E W de Bekker-Grob; P P L O Coene; E van der Harst; S M Lagarde; J Shapiro; B P L Wijnhoven; J J B van Lanschot Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Donald E Low; Madhan Kumar Kuppusamy; Derek Alderson; Ivan Cecconello; Andrew C Chang; Gail Darling; Andrew Davies; Xavier Benoit D'Journo; Suzanne S Gisbertz; S Michael Griffin; Richard Hardwick; Arnulf Hoelscher; Wayne Hofstetter; Blair Jobe; Yuko Kitagawa; Simon Law; Christophe Mariette; Nick Maynard; Christopher R Morse; Philippe Nafteux; Manuel Pera; C S Pramesh; Sonia Puig; John V Reynolds; Wolfgang Schroeder; Mark Smithers; B P L Wijnhoven Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Mark van Heijl; Jikke M Omloo; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard; Patrick M Bossuyt; Olivier R Busch; Hugo W Tilanus; Maarten C Hulshof; Ate van der Gaast; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Han J Bonenkamp; John Th Plukker; Miguel A Cuesta; Fiebo J Ten Kate; Jan Pruim; Herman van Dekken; Jacques J Bergman; Gerrit W Sloof; J Jan van Lanschot Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Bo Jan Noordman; David van Klaveren; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Ate van der Gaast; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Katharina Biermann; Ewout W Steyerberg; J Jan B van Lanschot Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Elena Elimova; Xuemei Wang; Elba Etchebehere; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Roopma Wadhwa; Venkatram Planjery; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Mariela A Blum; Wayne Hofstetter; Jeff H Lee; Brian R Weston; Manoop S Bhutani; Jane E Rogers; Dipen Maru; Heath D Skinner; Homer A Macapinlac; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: A S Borggreve; S Mook; M Verheij; V E M Mul; J J Bergman; A Bartels-Rutten; L C Ter Beek; R G H Beets-Tan; R J Bennink; M I van Berge Henegouwen; L A A Brosens; I L Defize; J M van Dieren; H Dijkstra; R van Hillegersberg; M C Hulshof; H W M van Laarhoven; M G E H Lam; A L H M W van Lier; C T Muijs; W B Nagengast; A J Nederveen; W Noordzij; J T M Plukker; P S N van Rossum; J P Ruurda; J W van Sandick; B L A M Weusten; F E M Voncken; D Yakar; G J Meijer Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-10-20 Impact factor: 4.430