| Literature DB >> 28881765 |
Takahiko Nishiyama1, Takehiro Kimura1, Taishi Fujisawa1, Kazuaki Nakajima1, Akira Kunitomi1, Shin Kashimura1, Yoshinori Katsumata1, Nobuhiro Nishiyama1, Yoshiyasu Aizawa1, Keiichi Fukuda1, Seiji Takatsuki1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For perimitral atrial flutter (PMFL) developing after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), to create a complete conduction block at the mitral isthmus (MI) is mandatory to terminate it, however, it is still challenging.Entities:
Keywords: artial fibrillation; catheter ablation; mitral isthmus; perimitral atrial flutter; steerable sheath
Year: 2017 PMID: 28881765 PMCID: PMC5581064 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Baseline characteristics
| Total N = 80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 61 ± 8.1 | E (cm/s) | 77 ± 16 |
| Male (n) | 76 | A (cm/s) | 57 ± 29 |
| Height (cm) | 170 ± 7.0 | Dct (ms) | 179 ± 49 |
| Body Weight (kg) | 73 ± 10 | E’ IVS | 8.7 ± 2.5 |
| Paroxysmal AF | 20 | E’ LW | 12.3 ± 3.5 |
| Persistent AF | 41 | TEE LAA-E (cm/s) | 39 ± 17 |
| Longstanding persistent AF | 19 | TEE LAA-F (cm/s) | 44 ± 19 |
| Duration of AF (M) | 46 ± 41 | Cr (mg/dl) | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
| CHADAS2 score | 0.8 ± 1.0 | BNP (pg/ml) | 147 ± 149 |
| LVEDD (cm) | 4.8 ± 0.5 | Number of AAD | 0.3 ± 0.6 |
| LVESD (cm) | 3.1 ± 0.6 | Number of β-blocker | 0.5 ± 0.5 |
| Left atrial diameter (cm) | 4.3 ± 0.6 |
Data are given as mean ± SD. LVEDD = Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVESD = Left ventricular end-systolic diameter, E = Mitral flow E-wave, A = Mitral flow A-wave, Dct = E-wave deceleration time, E’ IVS= Tissue Doppler of the septal mitral anular velocity, E’ LW = Tissue Doppler of the lateral mitral annular velocity, TEE = transesophageal echocardiogram, LAA-E = left atrial appendage emptying flow velocity; LAA-F = left atrial appendage filling flow velocity
Figure 1The acute procedural outcome is shown
In (A) the MI block-line was achieved in 51/80 patients with only endocardial ablation. An epicardial ablation from the CS was performed in 26/29 unsuccessful patients. Complete conduction block along the MI was achieved in 21/26. * No epicardial ablation was performed because of a high impedance or inappropriate potentials. In (B) the percentage of a complete and incomplete line of block of the MI is shown.
Charactersitics of the mitral isthmus by computed tomography
| Group 1 (N = 51) | Group 2 (N = 21) | Group 3 (N = 8) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length of MI (mm) | 36 [31–39] | 34 [32–37] | 36 [34–37] | n.s |
| Maximum thickness (mm) | 3.3 [2.9-3.7] | 3.2 [2.5-3.5] | 3.0 [2.6-3.2] | n.s |
| Pouch morphology | 6% | 14% | 25% | n.s |
| Interposed cicumflex | 31% | 48% | 75% | <0.05 |
| Distance to CS (mm) | 3.1 [2.8-4.2] | 3.2 [2.4-4.1] | 4.2 [3.4-4.6] | n.s |
| Distance to LCX (mm) | 3.2 [2.6-4.6] | 2.6 [2.3-4.7] | 2.5 [2.3-3.7] | n.s |
Data are shown as the median and interquartile range and relative frequencies.
MI = mitral ishmus, CS = coronary sinus, LCX = left coronary circumflex
Comparison of the ablation data of the mitral isthmus
| Group 1 (N = 51) | Group 2 (N = 21) | Group 3 (N = 8) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endocardial ablation time (min) | 6.8 [5.1-10.4] | 16.7 [12.4–22.3] | 31.0 [27.2-36.8] | <0.05 |
| Endocardial ablation energy (J) | 13461 [9879–18660] | 31171 [23083–43263] | 62456 [51930–74423] | <0.05 |
| CS ablation time (min) | - | 3.0 [1.6-3.9] | 2.6 [1.2-3.5] | n.s |
| CS ablation energy (J) | - | 3898 [2078–5277] | 3350 [1640–4751] | n.s |
| Total ablation time (min) | 6.8 [5.1-10.4] | 20.9 [16.6-24.9] | 34.5 [28.0-40.2] | <0.05 |
| Total ablation energy (J) | 13461 [9879–18660] | 35580 [29303–45563] | 67091 [52738–79009] | <0.05 |
Data are shown as the median and interquartile range.
CS = coronary sinus
Figure 2The clinical outcome is shown
Nineteen patients had recurrence of atrial arrhythmias (AT: N = 11, AF: N = 8). Among them, ten (AT: N = 7, AF : N = 3) underwent a second procedure. PMFL was observed in 6 out of 7 AT patients. In two cases, a VOM ethanol infusion was performed. Follow up period: 16 ± 6 months. VOM: vein of Marshall.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier curves of the AT/AF free survival rate for each group
Figure 4Angiography of the left atrial appendage (LAA) showing the boundary between the LAA and lateral free wall (upper panel)
Radiography showing the circular mapping catheter in the left atrial appendage, and right anterior oblique (RAO) and left anterior oblique (LAO) views of the catheter position during the mitral isthmus ablation (lower panel). The ablation was started with the ablation catheter located at the earliest activation site during CS pacing. A steerable sheath was used to facilitate the catheter manipulation.
Figure 5Progressive changes in the LAA sequence were observed along the mitral isthmus ablation line during CS pacing
In (A)-(D) we mapped the earliest activation site, which preceded the sequence of the LAA. Intracardiac recordings during pacing from the distal pole of the CS catheter are shown in the lower panel (left panel: pre ablation, right panel: post change in the sequence). In E, the MI block-line was completed. In F, conduction block on the opposite side was demonstrated by differential pacing from the upper side of the ablation line. An anatomical description of the 3D mapping system is shown in the upper panel.