| Literature DB >> 28881665 |
Young-Suk Jung1,2, Abdo J Najy1, Wei Huang1, Seema Sethi1, Michael Snyder3,4, Wael Sakr1, Gregory Dyson3, Maik Hüttemann5, Icksoo Lee5,6, Rouba Ali-Fehmi1, Silvia Franceschi7, Linda Struijk8, Harold E Kim3,4, Ikuko Kato3,1, Hyeong-Reh Choi Kim1.
Abstract
HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients experience significantly lower locoregional recurrence and higher overall survival in comparison with HPV-negative patients, especially among those who received radiation therapy. The goal of the present study is to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the differential radiation sensitivity between HPV-negative and HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here, we show that HPV-negative HNSCC cells exhibit increased glucose metabolism as evidenced by increased production of lactate, while HPV-positive HNSCC cells effectively utilize mitochondrial respiration as evidenced by increased oxygen consumption. HPV-negative cells express HIF1α and its downstream mediators of glucose metabolism such as hexokinase II (HKII) and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) at higher levels, while the expression level of cytochrome c oxidase (COX) was noticeably higher in HPV-positive HNSCC. In addition, the expression levels of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases (PDKs), which inhibit pyruvate dehydrogenase activity, thereby preventing entry of pyruvate into the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, were much higher in HPV-negative HNSCC compared to those in HPV-positive cells. Importantly, a PDK inhibitor, dichloroacetate, effectively sensitized HPV-negative cells to irradiation. Lastly, we found positive interactions between tonsil location and HPV positivity for COX intensity and COX/HKII index ratio as determined by immunohistochemical analysis. Overall survival of patients with HNSCC at the tonsil was significantly improved with an increased COX expression. Taken together, the present study provides molecular insights into the mechanistic basis for the differential responses to radiotherapy between HPV-driven vs. spontaneous or chemically induced oropharyngeal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: glucose metabolism; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; human papillomavirus; mitochondrial respiration; radiation
Year: 2017 PMID: 28881665 PMCID: PMC5584266 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17887
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Characterization and differential expression of metabolism regulators between HPV-negative and HPV-positive HNSCC cell lines
(A) Clinical characteristics of the HNSCC cell lines. (B) RT-PCR analysis of HPV E6 and E7 expression in HNSCC cell lines. (C) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of HIF1α mRNA. (D) Immunoblot analysis of cytoplasmic and nuclear HIF1α proteins in HNSCC cell lines. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Hexokinase II. (F) Immunoblot analysis of hexokinase II, CAIX and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1. Each bar represents the mean ± S.D. Means with different letters (a, b, c) are significantly different from one another at P value < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test).
Figure 2Increased glycolysis in HPV-negative cells and increased respiration in HPV-positive HNSCC
(A) Lactate production, (B) mitochondrial respiration and (C) cell viability in the absence of glucose in HNSCC cell lines. Each bar represents the mean ± S.D. Means with different letters (a, b, c) are significantly different from one another at P value < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test).
Figure 3Analysis of tissue samples from patients with HNSCC
(A) Overall survival of oropharyngeal cancer patients stratified by tonsil location and HPV status. (B) Immunohistochemical analysis of cytochrome c oxidase (COX) subunit 1 and hexokinase II (HKII) in HPV-positive and HPV-negative tissues samples from patients with oropharyngeal cancer (x400 magnification).
Results of ordinal logistic regression analyses for response variable of COX intensity and COX/HKII index ratio in three levels by tumor location
| Tonsil (N=36) | Non-tonsil (N=43) | P-value forinteractionwith tonsil | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response variables | Explanatory variables | Regression coefficient | Standard Error | P-values | Regression coefficient | Standard Error | P-values | |
| Cox intensity | HPV positive | 5.358 | 2.670 | 0.045 | 0.143 | 1.245 | 0.909 | 0.067 |
| Smoking | 1.427 | 1.266 | 0.259 | 0.642 | 0.552 | 0.245 | 0.548 | |
| HPV *smoking | -3.162 | 1.511 | 0.036 | -0.707 | 0.851 | 0.406 | 0.137 | |
| CoX/HKII index ratio | HPV positive | 4.738 | 2.868 | 0.099 | -1.255 | 1.262 | 0.320 | 0.045 |
| Smoking | 0.630 | 1.374 | 0.647 | 0.000 | 0.531 | 1.000 | 0.650 | |
| HPV*smoking | -2.582 | 1.608 | 0.108 | 0.486 | 0.849 | 0.568 | 0.076 |
OR: Odds ratio
P-values for interaction with tonsil were derived from a separate model including both sites
Non tonsil cases were 42 for Cox/HKII index ratio
Results of binary logistic regression analyses for COX intensity with 2 different cutoff points
| COX intensity cutoff | Tonsil (N=36) | Non-tonsil (N=43) | P-value forinteractionwith tonsil | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explanatory variables | Regression coefficient | Standard Error | P-values | Regression coefficient | Standard Error | P-values | ||
| None-weak vs moderate-strong | HPV positive | 7.300 | 3.333 | 0.029 | 0.843 | 1.533 | 0.766 | 0.078 |
| Smoking | 2.303 | 1.449 | 0.112 | 1.037 | 0.738 | 0.582 | 0.436 | |
| HPV *smoking | -4.349 | 1.881 | 0.021 | -0.616 | 1.179 | 0.160 | 0.093 | |
| None-moderate vs strong | HPV positive | 1.666 | 2.791 | 0.551 | -0.462 | 1.405 | 0.742 | 0.496 |
| Smoking | -0.406 | 1.394 | 0.771 | 0.250 | 0.576 | 0.665 | 0.664 | |
| HPV*smoking | -1.050 | 1.631 | 0.520 | -0.702 | 1.010 | 0.487 | 0.856 |
OR: Odds ratio
P-values for interaction with tonsil were derived from a separate model including both sites
Figure 4PDK expression profile in HNSCC cell lines
Quantitative RT-PCR of PDK1 (A), PDK2 (B), PDK3 (C), and PDK4 (D). Each bar represents the mean ± S.D. Means with different letters (a, b, c) are significantly different from one another at P value < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test). (E) Immunoblot analysis of PDK1.
Figure 5Inhibition of PDK sensitizes HPV (-) HNSCC to radiation
(A) Clonogenic cell survival assay of HPV (+) and HPV (-) HNSCC upon irradiation. (B) HPV(-) WSU12 and UM19 were treated with vehicle (veh) or 12mM DCA and PDK activity was assessed through pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) phospohorylation. (C) Clonogenic cell survival assay of WSU12 cells upon irradiation with or without DCA treatments. Means with * or ** are significantly different from one another at P value < 0.05 (ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test)