Literature DB >> 28881251

Registration and fusion quantification of augmented reality based nasal endoscopic surgery.

Yakui Chu1, Jian Yang2, Shaodong Ma1, Danni Ai1, Wenjie Li1, Hong Song3, Liang Li4, Duanduan Chen5, Lei Chen4, Yongtian Wang1.   

Abstract

This paper quantifies the registration and fusion display errors of augmented reality-based nasal endoscopic surgery (ARNES). We comparatively investigated the spatial calibration process for front-end endoscopy and redefined the accuracy level of a calibrated endoscope by using a calibration tool with improved structural reliability. We also studied how registration accuracy was combined with the number and distribution of the deployed fiducial points (FPs) for positioning and the measured registration time. A physically integrated ARNES prototype was customarily configured for performance evaluation in skull base tumor resection surgery with an innovative approach of dynamic endoscopic vision expansion. As advised by surgical experts in otolaryngology, we proposed a hierarchical rendering scheme to properly adapt the fused images with the required visual sensation. By constraining the rendered sight in a known depth and radius, the visual focus of the surgeon can be induced only on the anticipated critical anatomies and vessel structures to avoid misguidance. Furthermore, error analysis was conducted to examine the feasibility of hybrid optical tracking based on point cloud, which was proposed in our previous work as an in-surgery registration solution. Measured results indicated that the error of target registration for ARNES can be reduced to 0.77 ± 0.07 mm. For initial registration, our results suggest that a trade-off for a new minimal time of registration can be reached when the distribution of five FPs is considered. For in-surgery registration, our findings reveal that the intrinsic registration error is a major cause of performance loss. Rigid model and cadaver experiments confirmed that the scenic integration and display fluency of ARNES are smooth, as demonstrated by three clinical trials that surpassed practicality.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Endoscope; Fusion; Image registration; Image-guided surgery; Optical tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28881251     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2017.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  8 in total

1.  Perception enhancement using importance-driven hybrid rendering for augmented reality based endoscopic surgical navigation.

Authors:  Yakui Chu; Xu Li; Xilin Yang; Danni Ai; Yong Huang; Hong Song; Yurong Jiang; Yongtian Wang; Xiaohong Chen; Jian Yang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Head-mounted display augmented reality to guide pedicle screw placement utilizing computed tomography.

Authors:  Jacob T Gibby; Samuel A Swenson; Steve Cvetko; Raj Rao; Ramin Javan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Shape-constrained Gaussian process regression for surface reconstruction and multimodal, non-rigid image registration.

Authors:  Thomas Deregnaucourt; Chafik Samir; Sebastian Kurtek; Anne-Francoise Yao
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.416

4.  Feature matching for texture-less endoscopy images via superpixel vector field consistency.

Authors:  Shiyuan Liu; Jingfan Fan; Danni Ai; Hong Song; Tianyu Fu; Yongtian Wang; Jian Yang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Clinical Application of Augmented Reality in Computerized Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  K Kalaiarasan; Lavanya Prathap; M Ayyadurai; P Subhashini; T Tamilselvi; T Avudaiappan; I Infant Raj; Samson Alemayehu Mamo; Amine Mezni
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Calibrating 3D Scanner in the Coordinate System of Optical Tracker for Image-To-Patient Registration.

Authors:  Wenjie Li; Jingfan Fan; Shaowen Li; Zhaorui Tian; Zhao Zheng; Danni Ai; Hong Song; Jian Yang
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Accuracy of Portable Face-Scanning Devices for Obtaining Three-Dimensional Face Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hang-Nga Mai; Jaeil Kim; Youn-Hee Choi; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  A Novel Precise Optical Navigation System for Craniomaxillofacial Surgery Registered With an Occlusal Splint.

Authors:  Yikang Hou; Gang Chai; Zuoliang Qi
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 1.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.