Guillaume Pouessel1,2, Stépanie Lejeune2, Marie-Pierre Dupond3, Annie Renard3, Camille Fallot1, Antoine Deschildre2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital, Roubaix, France. 2. Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy Department, Pôle enfant, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU de Lille and Université Nord de France, Lille, France. 3. Department of Medical Care for School Children, National Education Services of the North Department of France, Lille, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The individual healthcare plan (IHP) was implemented in schools in France in 2003 to improve management of allergic children. Our objectives were to assess the practical aspects of IHP (excluding asthma) and allergic reactions occurring at school. METHODS: Prospective study conducted in the North Department (France) during the 2015/2016 school year. Two questionnaires were developed: one for the school doctors (n = 67) and one for the school principals (n = 2372). RESULTS: Data from 336 (25%) of the 1325 IHPs (0.24% of children) were collected (mean age: 8 years; food allergy [FA]: 94% [peanut = 44%, nuts = 54%], venom: 4%). Wide variations in emergency kit (EK) medications were observed: antihistamines (84%), oral corticosteroids (79%), adrenaline auto-injectors (70%), and inhaled bronchodilators (65%). Six hundred and seventy (28%) school principals' responses, representing 81% of all IHPs, were analyzed. A total of 1935 EKs were stored (mean: 2.8/school), one or more with adrenaline, by 213 (32%) schools: in the class room (33%), the nursery (14%), or the principal's office (10%). Sixty, mainly, mild-to-moderate allergic reactions (adrenaline injection: 2) occurred in 44 schools (0.09/school/year), in children with previously undocumented allergy in 50%. FA was highly suspected in 92%. CONCLUSION: Individual healthcare plan is mainly implemented for FA. Anaphylaxis remains rare in the school setting, and FA is often a suspected cause of reaction. Staff training should be improved. Application of the recommendations regarding the content and accessibility of EK and a widespread emergency action plan is needed.
BACKGROUND: The individual healthcare plan (IHP) was implemented in schools in France in 2003 to improve management of allergicchildren. Our objectives were to assess the practical aspects of IHP (excluding asthma) and allergic reactions occurring at school. METHODS: Prospective study conducted in the North Department (France) during the 2015/2016 school year. Two questionnaires were developed: one for the school doctors (n = 67) and one for the school principals (n = 2372). RESULTS: Data from 336 (25%) of the 1325 IHPs (0.24% of children) were collected (mean age: 8 years; food allergy [FA]: 94% [peanut = 44%, nuts = 54%], venom: 4%). Wide variations in emergency kit (EK) medications were observed: antihistamines (84%), oral corticosteroids (79%), adrenaline auto-injectors (70%), and inhaled bronchodilators (65%). Six hundred and seventy (28%) school principals' responses, representing 81% of all IHPs, were analyzed. A total of 1935 EKs were stored (mean: 2.8/school), one or more with adrenaline, by 213 (32%) schools: in the class room (33%), the nursery (14%), or the principal's office (10%). Sixty, mainly, mild-to-moderate allergic reactions (adrenaline injection: 2) occurred in 44 schools (0.09/school/year), in children with previously undocumented allergy in 50%. FA was highly suspected in 92%. CONCLUSION: Individual healthcare plan is mainly implemented for FA. Anaphylaxis remains rare in the school setting, and FA is often a suspected cause of reaction. Staff training should be improved. Application of the recommendations regarding the content and accessibility of EK and a widespread emergency action plan is needed.
Authors: Mae Jhelene L Santos; Kaitlyn A Merrill; Jennifer D Gerdts; Moshe Ben-Shoshan; Jennifer L P Protudjer Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 5.717