Literature DB >> 26454570

Comparison of Outcome and Survival After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Navigation and Conventional Techniques With an Average 9-Year Follow-Up.

Eun Kyoo Song1, Mohite N1, Seung-Hun Lee1, Bo-Ram Na1, Jong-Keun Seon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA) has become a treatment of choice for many patients with isolated unicomparmental arthritis due to its specific advantages over total knee arthroplasty, but few studies have compared conventional and navigational UKA with similar instrumentation on mid- to long-term results. We investigated whether the use of imageless navigation can improve implant positioning and clinical outcomes of UKA at a long-term follow-up compared to the conventional technique.
METHODS: We prospectively studied clinical and radiological results in 68 patients with an average age of 64.0 years (range, 50 to 81 years) who received UKA between January 2003 and December 2005 using the conventional or navigational technique. Clinical evaluations were performed preoperatively and the last follow-up included knee range of motion, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score. For radiologic evaluation, the mechanical alignment of the lower limb was measured using mechanical femoro-tibial angle (mFTA) and Kennedy protocol.
RESULTS: After an average 9-year follow-up (range, 7.4 to 10.8 years), the navigation group showed better coronal alignments of the components, fewer radiological outliers and better clinical scores, but similar estimated 10-year prosthesis survival rates.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the use of navigation significantly contributes to the desired mechanical axis and improved component placement as compared to the conventional technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, Level III.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; conventional; knee; navigation; unicompartmental

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26454570     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  16 in total

Review 1.  Navigated "small implants" in knee reconstruction.

Authors:  Norberto Confalonieri; Alessio Biazzo; Pietro Cerveri; Chris Pullen; Alfonso Manzotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Unicompartmental knee replacement - Current perspectives.

Authors:  Stefano Campi; Saket Tibrewal; Rory Cuthbert; Sheo B Tibrewal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-11-28

4.  Body mass index changes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty do not adversely influence patient outcomes.

Authors:  Zhan Xia; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Graham Seow-Hng Goh; Hwei Chi Chong; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Dependence of knee range of motion on the alignment of femoral and tibial components after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mitsuru Hanada; Kensuke Hotta; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-08-20

6.  Learning navigation - Learning with navigation. A review.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Frederic Picard
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-06-02

7.  Early Economic Evaluation Demonstrates That Noncomputerized Tomography Robotic-Assisted Surgery Is Cost-Effective in Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at High-Volume Orthopaedic Centres.

Authors:  Leo M Nherera; Sanjay Verma; Paul Trueman; Simon Jennings
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2020-04-14

8.  No improvement in reducing outliers in coronal axis alignment with patient-specific instrumentation.

Authors:  Uwe Maus; Carlos J Marques; David Scheunemann; Frank Lampe; Djordje Lazovic; Hagen Hommel; Dennis Vogel; Martin Haunschild; Tilman Pfitzner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  What Percentage of Patients is a Candidate for Unicompartmental Knee Replacement at a Chinese Arthroplasty Center?

Authors:  Yong He; Lianbo Xiao; Weitao Zhai; Maximilian F Kasparek; Guilin Ouyang; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-01-30

10.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications, technical issues and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.