Literature DB >> 28878862

Permanent draft genome sequence of Frankia sp. NRRL B-16219 reveals the presence of canonical nod genes, which are highly homologous to those detected in Candidatus Frankia Dg1 genome.

Amir Ktari1, Imen Nouioui1, Teal Furnholm2, Erik Swanson2, Faten Ghodhbane-Gtari1, Louis S Tisa2, Maher Gtari1.   

Abstract

Frankia sp. NRRL B-16219 was directly isolated from a soil sample obtained from the rhizosphere of Ceanothus jepsonii growing in the USA. Its host plant range includes members of Elaeagnaceae species. Phylogenetically, strain NRRL B-16219 is closely related to "Frankia discariae" with a 16S rRNA gene similarity of 99.78%. Because of the lack of genetic tools for Frankia, our understanding of the bacterial signals involved during the plant infection process and the development of actinorhizal root nodules is very limited. Since the first three Frankia genomes were sequenced, additional genome sequences covering more diverse strains have helped provide insight into the depth of the pangenome and attempts to identify bacterial signaling molecules like the rhizobial canonical nod genes. The genome sequence of Frankia sp. strain NRRL B-16219 was generated and assembled into 289 contigs containing 8,032,739 bp with 71.7% GC content. Annotation of the genome identified 6211 protein-coding genes, 561 pseudogenes, 1758 hypothetical proteins and 53 RNA genes including 4 rRNA genes. The NRRL B-16219 draft genome contained genes homologous to the rhizobial common nodulation genes clustered in two areas. The first cluster contains nodACIJH genes whereas the second has nodAB and nodH genes in the upstream region. Phylogenetic analysis shows that Frankia nod genes are more deeply rooted than their sister groups from rhizobia. PCR-sequencing suggested the widespread occurrence of highly homologous nodA and nodB genes in microsymbionts of field collected Ceanothus americanus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actinorhizal symbiosis; Canonical nod genes; Ceanothus; Frankia; Genome; Plant-microbe interactions

Year:  2017        PMID: 28878862      PMCID: PMC5584510          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-017-0261-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

The symbiosis resulting from members of the genus 10.1601/nm.7635 interacting with the roots of 8 dicotyledonous plant families (referred to actinorhizal plants) is found worldwide and contributes to the ability of actinorhizal pioneer plants to grow in poor and marginally fertile soils [1]. This symbiotic association has drawn interest because of its higher rate of soil nitrogen input and the ability of the plants to overcome harsh environmental conditions [2]. The molecular mechanism for the establishment of an actinorhizal nitrogen-fixing root nodule remains elusive [3]. Molecular phylogeny of the 10.1601/nm.7635 genus has consistently identified four main clusters regardless of the typing locus used [1]. These 10.1601/nm.7635 clusters also follow and support the host specificity groups proposed by Baker [4]. Cluster 1 is divided into sub-cluster 1a including 10.1601/nm.7636 and relatives that are infective on and and sub-cluster 1b strains that are infective on , and including 10.1601/nm.29311 [5]. Cluster 2 contains 10.1601/nm.29887 [6] and uncultured microsymbionts of , , and , while cluster 3, associated 10.1601/nm.29312 [5], “ 10.1601/nm.30356 ” [7] and closely related strains are infective on , , and . Finally, cluster 4 groups a broad range of non-nitrogen-fixing and infective strains including 10.1601/nm.29990 species [8] together with “F. asymbiotica” [9] and other related strains that are unable to establish a symbiosis with actinorhizal plants. As has been established for rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioes, the LysM-RLKs are also involved in the perception of 10.1601/nm.7635 signal molecules by the actinorhizal plant [10, 11]. However, the bacterial signals triggering this symbiosis remain unknown. At present, more than 30 10.1601/nm.7635 genomes from strains in pure culture have been sequenced and annotated [12-30] and two Candidatus genomes were generated from nodule metagenomes [31, 32]. Analysis of the 10.1601/nm.7635 genomes failed to reveal the presence of common canonical nodABC genes [33] which also appear to be missing in several photosynthetic [34] and non-photosynthetic [35] bradyrhizobia. The only exceptions were found in the two Candidatus Frankia genomes, which contained the canonical nodABC and sulfotransferase nodH genes [32, 36]. This contradictory situation justifies additional sequencing of genomes from cultivated 10.1601/nm.7635 strains to gain insight into the depth of the pangenome pool covered. Here we report the first proof of the presence of rhizobial homologous canonical nodABCH genes within the draft genome of cultivated 10.1601/nm.7635 isolate, strain 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 and widespread occurrence of nodAB in field collected microsymbionts.

Organism information

Classification and features

Strain 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 metabolizes short fatty acids, TCA-cycle intermediates and carbohydrates (Table 1). It is infective on members of and and produces effective root nodules [4, 37]. In coherence with its host range, strain 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 is phylogenetically affiliated to cluster 3, known to effectively nodulate members of , and families. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequence showed that strain 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 was most closely related to type strains of “ 10.1601/nm.30356 ” 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DDSM+46785 T (99.78%) and 10.1601/nm.29312 (98.26%) (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Classification and general features of Frankia sp. strain NRRL B-16219 according to MIGS [45]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [46]
Phylum Actinobacteria TAS [47]
Class Actinobacteria TAS [48]
Order Frankiales TAS [49]
Family Frankiaceae TAS [50, 51]
Genus Frankia TAS [52, 53]
Species Frankia sp.IDR
Strain NRRL B-16219IDA
Gram stainPositiveIDA
Cell shapeFilament-shapedIDA
MotilityNon-motileNAS
SporulationSporulatingNAS
Temperature range25–35 °CTAS [5]
Optimum temperature28 °CTAS [5]
pH range; OptimumpH 6.3 – pH 6.8NAS
Carbon sourceshort fatty acids, TCA-cycle intermediates and carbohydratesIDA
MIGS-6HabitatSoil and Host-associatedIDA
MIGS-6.3SalinityNot reported
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementAerobicNAS
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipFree-living and Host plant-associatedNAS
MIGS-14PathogenicityNon-pathogenNAS
MIGS-4Geographic locationSoil beneath Ceanothus jepsonii, USAIDA
MIGS-5Sample collection1982IDA
MIGS-4.1LatitudeNot reported-
MIGS-4.2LongitudeNot reported-
MIGS-4.4AltitudeNot reported-

a Evidence codes – IDA INFERRED FROM DIRECT ASSAY, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature) NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence)

Fig. 1

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences (1400 nt), showing the relationships between Frankia NRRL B-16219 and Frankia species. The ML tree was inferred using the GTR + GAMMA model and rooted by midpoint-rooting; the branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. The numbers above the branches are support values when larger than 60% from ML (left) and MP (right) bootstrapping

Classification and general features of Frankia sp. strain NRRL B-16219 according to MIGS [45] a Evidence codes – IDA INFERRED FROM DIRECT ASSAY, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature) NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence) Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences (1400 nt), showing the relationships between Frankia NRRL B-16219 and Frankia species. The ML tree was inferred using the GTR + GAMMA model and rooted by midpoint-rooting; the branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. The numbers above the branches are support values when larger than 60% from ML (left) and MP (right) bootstrapping 10.1601/nm.7635 sp. strain 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 shows typical 10.1601/nm.7635 morphological structures; branched hyphae, vesicles, the site of nitrogenase activity, and multilocular sporangia containing non-motile spores (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Scanning electron micrograph of strain NRRL B-16219 after growth for 4 weeks in liquid DPM medium at 28 °C showing hyphae (h), vesicles (v) and sporangia (s)

Scanning electron micrograph of strain NRRL B-16219 after growth for 4 weeks in liquid DPM medium at 28 °C showing hyphae (h), vesicles (v) and sporangia (s) Organization of nod genes in Frankia NRRL B-16219 and Candidatus Frankia datiscae Dg1 genomes. Sizes, localization and orientation of the genes are displayed proportionally. These genes are not detectable in any other Frankia genome except Candidatus Frankia Dg2

Extended feature descriptions

Strain 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 represents one of the rare 10.1601/nm.7635 strains directly isolated from soil on plate medium without passing through plant trapping assay. The strain was isolated from the rhizosphere of [37] following a complex protocol of soil treatment with phenol (0.7%), sample fractionation through ultracentrifugation in sucrose density gradient, and plating on solid DPM without nitrogen source. Strain 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 developed unpigmented white colonies after 4 weeks growth on DPM medium at 28 °C without shaking. The strain was phenotyped using GENIII microplates in an Omnilog device (BIOLOG Inc., Haywood, USA) as previously described [5]. It was able to metabolize acetic acid, citric acid, D-cellobiose, dextrin, D-fructose, D-mannitol, D-mannose, fructose-6-phosphate, fusidic acid, glucose-6-phosphate, D and L malic acid, p-hydroxy-phenylacetic acid, propionic acid and D-serine and to grow in presence of 1% sodium lactate and up to 1% NaCl. Growth occurred between pH 5.0–6.8. The strain showed tolerant only to rifamycin.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

Because it is one of the rare strains isolated directly from the soil, 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 strain was selected as part of an effort to gain insight into the depth of the pangenome pool and to identify symbiotic signaling molecules. The sequencing project was completed in April 2016 and the generated data was submitted as draft genome to Genbank under BioProject PRJNA318440 and the accession number MAXA00000000.1.

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

The studied strain was kindly provided by David Labeda, ARS USDA bacterial collection, as 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 strain ID. The strain was grown at 28 °C in stationary culture in 1-l bottles containing DPM medium [5], supplemented with 0.5 mM NH4Cl as nitrogen source maintained. Biomass from 1 month-old culture was harvested by centrifugation at 9000 x g for 15 min, rinsed several times with sterile distilled water. The mycelial mats were broken by repeated passages through syringes with progressively smaller diameters (21 g to 27 g). Genomic DNA extraction was performed using Plant DNeasy kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the recommendation of the manufacturer. Prior to genome sequencing, the quality of the isolated DNA was checked by using the prepared DNA as template for PCR and partial sequences of several housekeeping genes and the 16S rRNA gene were generated and analyzed [16].

Genome sequencing and assembly

Sequencing of the draft genome of 10.1601/nm.7635 sp. 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 was performed at the Hubbard Center for Genome Studies (University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH) using Illumina technology [38]. A standard Illumina shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform with pair-end reads of 2 × 250 bp. The Illumina sequence data were trimmed by Trimmonatic version 0.32 [39], and assembled using Spades version 3.5 [40], and ALLPaths-LG version r52488 [41].

Genome annotation

The genome was annotated via the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Additionally nod gene prediction analysis was done within the Integrated Microbial Genomes-Expert Review system developed by the Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA [42] developed by the Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA, using similarity search tools. This whole-genome shotgun sequence has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number MAXA00000000.1. The version described in this paper is the first version, MAXA00000000.1. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityDraft genome
MIGS-28Libraries usedIllumina Standard library
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsIllumina HiSeq2500 platform
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage120.5×
MIGS 30AssemblersSpades version 3.5, ALLPaths-LG version r52488
MIGS 32Gene calling methodGeneMarkS+ v3.3
Locus TagBBK14_RS02460
Genbank IDMAXA00000000.1
Genbank Date of ReleaseOctober 30, 2016
GOLD IDGp0153653
BIOPROJECTPRJNA224116
MIGS 13Source Material IdentifierNRRL B-16219
Project relevanceAgricultural
Project information

Genome properties

The draft genome of 10.1601/nm.7635 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 consisted of 289 DNA contigs that correspond to estimated genome size of 8,032,739 bp and a GC content of 71.7%. The draft genome contained 6859 total genes, including 6211 protein-encoding genes (90.55%), 561 pseudo genes (8.17%) and 53 RNAs (0.76%) (Table 3). Classification of genes into the COG functional categories is shown in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Totala
Genome size (bp)8,032,739100.0
DNA coding (bp)6,603,16682.20
DNA G + C (bp)5,760,84071.72
DNA Contigs289100.0
Total genes6859100.0
Protein coding genes6, 21191.01
RNA genes530.77
Pseudo genesb 5618.18
Genes in internal clusters--
Genes with function prediction504673.60
Genes assigned to COGs360952.64
Genes with Pfam domains473569.06
Genes with signal peptides1762.57
Genes with transmembrane helices2964.32
CRISPR repeats2-

aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total genes in the annotated genome

bPseudo genes may also be counted as protein coding or RNA genes, so is not additive under total gene count

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

CodeValue% agea Description
J1784.27Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.02RNA processing and modification
K4089.79Transcription
L1092.62Replication, recombination and repair
B10.02Chromatin structure and dynamics
D320.77Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
V1353.24Defense mechanisms
T2495.98Signal transduction mechanisms
M1734.15Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N210.5Cell motility
U300.72Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O1403.36Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2506Energy production and conversion
G2074.97Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2977.13Amino acid transport and metabolism
F942.26Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H2626.29Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I3518.42Lipid transport and metabolism
P2105.04Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q2566.14Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R50812.19General function prediction only
S1784.27Function unknown
-324747.36Not in COGs

aThe total is based on the total number of protein-coding genes in the genome

Genome statistics aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total genes in the annotated genome bPseudo genes may also be counted as protein coding or RNA genes, so is not additive under total gene count Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories aThe total is based on the total number of protein-coding genes in the genome

Insights from the genome sequence

Comparison of genomes from 10.1601/nm.7635 sp. 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 and other 10.1601/nm.7635 species

The 10.1601/nm.7635 sp. 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 genome was compared to all of the 10.1601/nm.7635 genomes available at NCBI genome database including seven 10.1601/nm.7635 species including 10.1601/nm.7636 , 10.1601/nm.29311, 10.1601/nm.29312, 10.1601/nm.29887, “ 10.1601/nm.30356 ”, 10.1601/nm.29990, and “F. asymbiotica”, two Candidatus Frankia and other 10.1601/nm.7635 sp. strains. As shown for other closely related strains from cluster 3, strain 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 has one of the largest genome sizes (8,032,739 bp) with a high GC content of 71.72%. Genes shown or suggested to be involved in the actinorhizal symbiosis were detected. Nitrogenase genes were organized into one operon: nifH-D-K-E-N-X-orf1-orf2-W-Z-B-U and a non-linked nifV gene. Genes encoding the hydrogenase subunits were clustered into two operons. Genes for two different types of truncated hemoglobins, HbN and HbO, were also present.

Nodulation pathway

In rhizobia, the common canonical nodABC genes playing a key role in triggering root nodule formation in Legumes. These signals are secreted as a reply to host-plant flavonoids perceived by the compatible rhizobial strains [43]. The Nod factors perceived by host plant through the LysM-RLKs, and the resulting signal transduction cascade triggers a bacterial invasion of root cortical cells and the genesis of functional nodules. Despite the presence of these LysM-RLKs in the actinorhizal plants [11], none of the 10.1601/nm.7635 genomes from cultivated strains contained any homologous nod genes [33], but they are present in the two Candidatus Frankia genomes [32, 36]. Six nod-like genes were detected in the 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 draft genome (Additional file 1: Table S1) organized into two regions (Fig. 3). The first cluster contained genes encoding the nodA1, nodC, ABC-2 type transport system ATP-binding protein (nodJ), ABC-2 transporter efflux protein, DrrB family (nodI) and nodH. The second cluster contained nodA, nodB and a nodH genes. Amino acid sequence similarities between 10.1601/nm.7635 sp. strain 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219 NodA, B, C, and H predicted proteins ranged from 86 to 93% and 57–67% with the uncultured 10.1601/nm.7635 (Dg1 and Dg2) and (α- and β-) rhizobia, respectively (Additional file 2: Table S2). Further phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 4) showed that the 10.1601/nm.7635 Nod proteins were positioned at the root of both the α- and β-rhizobial NodABC proteins as previously reported [4, 8]. They were most closely related to plant nodulating 10.1601/nm.1616 of 10.1601/nm.1619 and 10.1601/nm.26956 genera. The GC content of 10.1601/nm.7635 nod genes ranged from 57.9% for nodA to 66.37% for nodB which is quite similar to that of some rhizobial species including 10.1601/nm.1581 and Burkoldaria. For both 10.1601/nm.7635 and rhizobia, GC% of the nod genes was lower than that of total genome sequences.
Fig. 3

Organization of nod genes in Frankia NRRL B-16219 and Candidatus Frankia datiscae Dg1 genomes. Sizes, localization and orientation of the genes are displayed proportionally. These genes are not detectable in any other Frankia genome except Candidatus Frankia Dg2

Fig. 4

Maximum likelihood phylogeny based on amino acids of nodA (a), nodB (b), nodC (c) and nodH (d). GC-content is provided for nod genes and for genomes (in parenthesis). Bootstrap and probability values larger than 50% are only shown

Maximum likelihood phylogeny based on amino acids of nodA (a), nodB (b), nodC (c) and nodH (d). GC-content is provided for nod genes and for genomes (in parenthesis). Bootstrap and probability values larger than 50% are only shown

Field collected microsymbionts of contain nod genes

Root nodules from , and growing in Tunisia and and growing in Durham New Hampshire, USA, were collected. The nodA-nodB region from C. americanus nodules was PCR-amplified and sequenced. Following the alignments of the nodA and nodB gene sequences of Dg1 and 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DNRRL+B-16219, the primer set (forward primer nodAF 5′-AGCGCGACCCGAGCTCAGGATAATCG-3′ and reverse nodBF (5′-CGATCCCACCCGGATGGAGCTGC-3′) was designed in this study. The sequenced PCR-products were translated into amino acid sequences to permit the detection of the 23 aa sequence at the beginning of the 193 aa of the NodA, the intergenic region (160 nucleotides) and 41 aa at the end of the 230aa of the NodB. Both sequences showed 100% sequence similarities to their respective homologous region in NodA (23/193aa) and NodB (41/230aa) protein sequences for Candidatus Frankia Dg1. Regardless of their affiliation to cluster 2 or to cluster 3 (Fig. 5), all of the analyzed C. americanus microsymbionts contained the nodAB genes. In contrast, A. glutinosa, C. glauca, E. umbellata and E. angustifolia microsymbionts failed to amplify the expected PCR product. This result is in congruence with previous reports claiming that no homologous nod genes are retrievable in sequenced genomes from strains isolated from these actinorhizal plant species [33].
Fig. 5

Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree based on glnA gene sequences. Bootstrap and probability values larger than 50% are only shown. Marked in bold are Frankia strains or microsymbionts with nod genes as present in their genomes or detected by PCR-sequencing analysis

Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree based on glnA gene sequences. Bootstrap and probability values larger than 50% are only shown. Marked in bold are Frankia strains or microsymbionts with nod genes as present in their genomes or detected by PCR-sequencing analysis

Conclusions

We report here the genome sequence of a 10.1601/nm.7635 strain directly isolated from soil rhizosphere. The generated draft genome was assembled into 289 contigs corresponding to 8,032,739 bp, which falls within the size range of 10.1601/nm.7635 cluster 3 [33]. Bacterial factors triggering actinorhizal symbiosis remain enigmatic since many sequenced 10.1601/nm.7635 genomes have revealed the absence of universal nod-factors. It was hypothesized that most 10.1601/nm.7635 strains use a novel nod-independent pathway for the infection process of actinorhizal plants. In contrast, two Candidatus Frankia Dg1 and Dg2 genomes contain canonical nod genes [32, 36]. Here we provide the first proof for the presence of nod genes in the genome of a cultivated 10.1601/nm.7635 strain. In addition, a PCR-sequencing approach suggested that nod genes are only widespread in C. americanus microsymbionts. This situation is similar to legume symbionts where two nodulation pathways are described: the well-studied nod-dependent and an alternative nod-independent pathway. The majority of rhizobia use the nod-dependent pathway, while some photosynthetic [34] and non-photosynthetic [35] bradyrhizobia use the alternative nod-independent pathway. Moreover, some rhizobia use both pathways and the use of the nod-independent pathway seems to be highly dependent on host species rather than the presence or absence of nod genes in a given bradyrhizobial genome [44]. For 10.1601/nm.7635, almost all host plants are infected through the nod-independent pathway, while the nod-dependent process may only be present in unstudied actinorhizal species such as members of the genus . Localizations and DNA coordinates for nod genes in NRRL B16219 and Dg1 genomes. (DOCX 12 kb) Percent similarities based on amino acid sequence for NodA, B, C and H between Frankia sp. NRRL B-16219, Candidatus Frankia Dg1 and Dg2, and other rhizobial strains. (XLSX 308 kb)
  43 in total

1.  Solexa Ltd.

Authors:  Simon Bennett
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  Genome sequence of "Candidatus Frankia datiscae" Dg1, the uncultured microsymbiont from nitrogen-fixing root nodules of the dicot Datisca glomerata.

Authors:  Tomas Persson; David R Benson; Philippe Normand; Brian Vanden Heuvel; Petar Pujic; Olga Chertkov; Hazuki Teshima; David C Bruce; Chris Detter; Roxanne Tapia; Shunsheng Han; James Han; Tanja Woyke; Sam Pitluck; Len Pennacchio; Matt Nolan; Natalia Ivanova; Amrita Pati; Miriam L Land; Katharina Pawlowski; Alison M Berry
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.

Authors:  C R Woese; O Kandler; M L Wheelis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data.

Authors:  Sante Gnerre; Iain Maccallum; Dariusz Przybylski; Filipe J Ribeiro; Joshua N Burton; Bruce J Walker; Ted Sharpe; Giles Hall; Terrance P Shea; Sean Sykes; Aaron M Berlin; Daniel Aird; Maura Costello; Riza Daza; Louise Williams; Robert Nicol; Andreas Gnirke; Chad Nusbaum; Eric S Lander; David B Jaffe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Legumes symbioses: absence of Nod genes in photosynthetic bradyrhizobia.

Authors:  Eric Giraud; Lionel Moulin; David Vallenet; Valérie Barbe; Eddie Cytryn; Jean-Christophe Avarre; Marianne Jaubert; Damien Simon; Fabienne Cartieaux; Yves Prin; Gilles Bena; Laure Hannibal; Joel Fardoux; Mila Kojadinovic; Laurie Vuillet; Aurélie Lajus; Stéphane Cruveiller; Zoe Rouy; Sophie Mangenot; Béatrice Segurens; Carole Dossat; William L Franck; Woo-Suk Chang; Elizabeth Saunders; David Bruce; Paul Richardson; Philippe Normand; Bernard Dreyfus; David Pignol; Gary Stacey; David Emerich; André Verméglio; Claudine Médigue; Michael Sadowsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation.

Authors:  Victor M Markowitz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia N Ivanova; I-Min A Chen; Ken Chu; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Diversity analyses of Aeschynomene symbionts in Tropical Africa and Central America reveal that nod-independent stem nodulation is not restricted to photosynthetic bradyrhizobia.

Authors:  Lucie Miché; Lionel Moulin; Clémence Chaintreuil; José Luis Contreras-Jimenez; José-Antonio Munive-Hernández; María Del Carmen Villegas-Hernandez; Françoise Crozier; Gilles Béna
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 5.491

8.  Genome characteristics of facultatively symbiotic Frankia sp. strains reflect host range and host plant biogeography.

Authors:  Philippe Normand; Pascal Lapierre; Louis S Tisa; Johann Peter Gogarten; Nicole Alloisio; Emilie Bagnarol; Carla A Bassi; Alison M Berry; Derek M Bickhart; Nathalie Choisne; Arnaud Couloux; Benoit Cournoyer; Stephane Cruveiller; Vincent Daubin; Nadia Demange; Maria Pilar Francino; Eugene Goltsman; Ying Huang; Olga R Kopp; Laurent Labarre; Alla Lapidus; Celine Lavire; Joelle Marechal; Michele Martinez; Juliana E Mastronunzio; Beth C Mullin; James Niemann; Pierre Pujic; Tania Rawnsley; Zoe Rouy; Chantal Schenowitz; Anita Sellstedt; Fernando Tavares; Jeffrey P Tomkins; David Vallenet; Claudio Valverde; Luis G Wall; Ying Wang; Claudine Medigue; David R Benson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Symbiotic host-specificity of Rhizobium meliloti is determined by a sulphated and acylated glucosamine oligosaccharide signal.

Authors:  P Lerouge; P Roche; C Faucher; F Maillet; G Truchet; J C Promé; J Dénarié
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Experimental Evolution of Legume Symbionts: What Have We Learnt?

Authors:  Ginaini Grazielli Doin de Moura; Philippe Remigi; Catherine Masson-Boivin; Delphine Capela
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.096

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.